Literature DB >> 25732762

Management of cardiogenic shock.

Holger Thiele1, E Magnus Ohman2, Steffen Desch3, Ingo Eitel3, Suzanne de Waha3.   

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains the most common cause of death in patients with acute myocardial infarction although mortality could be reduced from formerly ∼80% to 40-50%. In addition to percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting, catecholamines, fluids, intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP), and also active assist devices are widely used for CS management. However, there is only limited evidence for any of the above treatments except for early revascularization and the relative ineffectiveness of IABP. This updated review will therefore outline the management of CS complicating acute myocardial infarction with major focus on evidence-based revascularization techniques, intensive care unit treatment including ventilation, transfusion regimens, adjunctive medication, and mechanical support devices. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assist device; Heart failure; Myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Shock; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732762     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  102 in total

1.  Epinephrine and short-term survival in cardiogenic shock: an individual data meta-analysis of 2583 patients.

Authors:  Valentine Léopold; Etienne Gayat; Romain Pirracchio; Jindrich Spinar; Jiri Parenica; Tuukka Tarvasmäki; Johan Lassus; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Sébastien Champion; Faiez Zannad; Serafina Valente; Philip Urban; Horng-Ruey Chua; Rinaldo Bellomo; Batric Popovic; Dagmar M Ouweneel; José P S Henriques; Gregor Simonis; Bruno Lévy; Antoine Kimmoun; Philippe Gaudard; Mir Babar Basir; Andrej Markota; Christoph Adler; Hannes Reuter; Alexandre Mebazaa; Tahar Chouihed
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  [Heart failure networks and centers : What does everyday life look like?]

Authors:  G Güder; G Ertl
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Device therapy: Where next in cardiogenic shock owing to myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Cardiac catheterization and percutaneous intervention procedures on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

Authors:  Cesar Y Guerrero-Miranda; Shelley A Hall
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

5.  [Cardiogenic shock].

Authors:  J Bauersachs; A Schäfer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock-how good is the evidence really?

Authors:  Roland Prondzinsky; Karl Werdan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

Review 7.  [Cardiac support and replacement systems].

Authors:  T Graf; H Thiele
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 0.840

8.  IABP plus ECMO-Is one and one more than two?

Authors:  Sebastian Nuding; Karl Werdan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Short-term effects of ambient air pollutants and myocardial infarction in Changzhou, China.

Authors:  Yongquan Yu; Shen Yao; Huibin Dong; Minghui Ji; Zhiyong Chen; Guiying Li; Xingjuan Yao; Shou-Lin Wang; Zhan Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 10.  Advanced Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  P Elliott Miller; Michael A Solomon; Dorothea McAreavey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.