Konstantina D Kourou1,2, Vasileios C Pezoulas1, Eleni I Georga1, Themis Exarchos1,3, Costas Papaloukas1,2, Michalis Voulgarelis4, Andreas Goules4, Andrianos Nezos5, Athanasios G Tzioufas4, Earalampos M Moutsopoulos6, Clio Mavragani7,5, Dimitrios I Fotiadis1,4,6. 1. 1 Unit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, Department of Materials Science and EngineeringThe University of Ioannina GR45110 Ioannina Greece. 2. 2 Department of Biological Applications and TechnologyThe University of Ioannina GR45110 Ioannina Greece. 3. 3 Department of InformaticsIonian University GR49100 Corfu Greece. 4. 4 Foundation for Research and Technology-HellasInstitute of Molecular Biology and BiotechnologyDepartment of Biomedical Research Ioannina GR45110 Greece. 5. 6 Department of Physiology, School of MedicineNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens GR15772 Athens Greece. 6. 7 Academy of Athens GR10679 Athens Greece. 7. 5 Department of Pathophysiology, School of MedicineNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens GR15772 Athens Greece.
Abstract
Lymphoma development constitutes one of the most serious clinico-pathological manifestations of patients with Sjögren's Syndrome (SS). Over the last decades the risk for lymphomagenesis in SS patients has been studied aiming to identify novel biomarkers and risk factors predicting lymphoma development in this patient population. Objective: The current study aims to explore whether genetic susceptibility profiles of SS patients along with known clinical, serological and histological risk factors enhance the accuracy of predicting lymphoma development in this patient population. Methods: The potential predicting role of both genetic variants, clinical and laboratory risk factors were investigated through a Machine Learning-based (ML) framework which encapsulates ensemble classifiers. Results: Ensemble methods empower the classification accuracy with approaches which are sensitive to minor perturbations in the training phase. The evaluation of the proposed methodology based on a 10-fold stratified cross validation procedure yielded considerable results in terms of balanced accuracy (GB: 0.7780 ± 0.1514, RF Gini: 0.7626 ± 0.1787, RF Entropy: 0.7590 ± 0.1837). Conclusions: The initial clinical, serological, histological and genetic findings at an early diagnosis have been exploited in an attempt to establish predictive tools in clinical practice and further enhance our understanding towards lymphoma development in SS.
Lymphoma development constitutes one of the most serious clinico-pathological manifestations of patients with Sjögren's Syndrome (SS). Over the last decades the risk for lymphomagenesis in SS patients has been studied aiming to identify novel biomarkers and risk factors predicting lymphoma development in this patient population. Objective: The current study aims to explore whether genetic susceptibility profiles of SS patients along with known clinical, serological and histological risk factors enhance the accuracy of predicting lymphoma development in this patient population. Methods: The potential predicting role of both genetic variants, clinical and laboratory risk factors were investigated through a Machine Learning-based (ML) framework which encapsulates ensemble classifiers. Results: Ensemble methods empower the classification accuracy with approaches which are sensitive to minor perturbations in the training phase. The evaluation of the proposed methodology based on a 10-fold stratified cross validation procedure yielded considerable results in terms of balanced accuracy (GB: 0.7780 ± 0.1514, RF Gini: 0.7626 ± 0.1787, RF Entropy: 0.7590 ± 0.1837). Conclusions: The initial clinical, serological, histological and genetic findings at an early diagnosis have been exploited in an attempt to establish predictive tools in clinical practice and further enhance our understanding towards lymphoma development in SS.
Authors: Luca Quartuccio; Sara Salvin; Martina Fabris; Marta Maset; Elena Pontarini; Miriam Isola; Salvatore De Vita Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Vasileios C Pezoulas; Konstantina D Kourou; Fanis Kalatzis; Themis P Exarchos; Aliki Venetsanopoulou; Evi Zampeli; Saviana Gandolfo; Fotini Skopouli; Salvatore De Vita; Athanasios G Tzioufas; Dimitrios I Fotiadis Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Anna P Risselada; Aike A Kruize; Roel Goldschmeding; Floris P J G Lafeber; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Joel A G van Roon Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Aristea Papageorgiou; Dimitrios C Ziogas; Clio P Mavragani; Elias Zintzaras; Athanasios G Tzioufas; Haralampos M Moutsopoulos; Michael Voulgarelis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sofia Fragkioudaki; Adrianos Nezos; Vassilis L Souliotis; Ilenia Chatziandreou; Angelica A Saetta; Nikolaos Drakoulis; Athanasios G Tzioufas; Michael Voulgarelis; Petros P Sfikakis; Michael Koutsilieris; Mary K Crow; Haralampos M Moutsopoulos; Clio P Mavragani Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Adrianos Nezos; Eliona Gkioka; Michael Koutsilieris; Michael Voulgarelis; Athanasios G Tzioufas; Clio P Mavragani Journal: J Immunol Res Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 4.818