| Literature DB >> 35402890 |
Maya Dannawi1,2, Mansour E Riachi1,2, Antony F Haddad1,2, Mohamed El Massry1,2, Mary Haddad1,2, Pamela Moukarzel1,2, Frédéric Harb3, Hilda E Ghadieh1,2, Assaad A Eid1,2.
Abstract
Aims: Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is correlated with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Intermittent fasting (IF) has been described as the cornerstone in the management of obesity; however, its role in prediabetic complications is not well elucidated. Cytochromes P450 Monooxygenases (CYP450) are major sources of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) that orchestrate the onset and development of diabetic complications. One of the CYP-metabolites, Expoxyecosatetraenoic Acids (EETs), are considered to be negative regulators of ROS production. In this study, we elucidated the role of IF on ROS production and investigated its influence on prediabetes-induced PN.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; Diabetic peripheral neuropathy; Intermittent fasting; Oxidative stress; Reactive oxygen species
Year: 2022 PMID: 35402890 PMCID: PMC8991399 DOI: 10.1016/j.metop.2022.100175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabol Open ISSN: 2589-9368
Functional parameters.
| Metabolic Parameters | Control | Prediabetic | Prediabetic | Prediabetic | Prediabetic | Prediabetic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 27.5 ± 0.2 | 34.3 ± 3.0 * | 24.6 ± 1.1 # | 28.6 ± 2.2 # | 29.2 ± 2.1 # | 32.7 ± 1.9 * |
| Random Glucose (mg/dL) | 151 ± 15.7 | 200 ± 11.7 * | 144 ± 9.3 # | 157 ± 5.0 # | 171 ± 8.7 | 182 ± 13.5 |
| HbA1c (%) | 4.2 ± 0.1 (22 mmol/mol) | 4.8 ± 0.1 * (29 mmol/mol) | 4.6 ± 0.1 (27 mmol/mol) | 3.8 ± 0.4 # (18 mmol/mol) | 4.1 ± 0.1 # (21 mmol/mol) | 4.4 ± 0.1 (25 mmol/mol) |
| Non-esterified Fatty Acids (mM) | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 1.18 ± 0.05 * | 0.66 ± 0.05 # | 0.74 ± 0.05 # | 0.72 ± 0.03 # | 1.18 ± 0.05 * |
| Total Cholesterol (mM) | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 6.36 ± 0.1 * | 3.34 ± 0.1 # | 3.52 ± 0.1 # | 4.38 ± 0.2 # | 5.84 ± 0.1 #* |
| Triglyceride levels (mM) | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 0.97 ± 0.04 * | 0.38 ± 0.03 # | 0.52 ± 0.06 # | 0.62 ± 0.03 # | 1.95 ± 0.04 * |
*p < 0.05 compared to control.
#p < 0.05 compared to prediabetic.
Fig. 1Effect of ADF on caloric intake and energy efficiency (A) Food consumption. (B) Energy efficiency. Values are the mean±SD from five different mice in each group (n = 5). *p < 0.05 vs control #p < 0.05 vs prediabetic.
Fig. 2Body mass composition analysis at the end of the study (A) Body weight (g). (B) Percentage of fat. (C) Percentage of lean mass. (D) Percentage of free fluid. Values are the mean±SD from five different mice in each group (n = 5). *p < 0.05 vs control #p < 0.05 vs prediabetic.
Fig. 3Effect of ADF and AUDA on behavioral phenotypes using sensory and motor tests (A) Plantar algesia test presented as time to paw withdrawal in seconds. Beam walking test presented as (B) Time to cross the beam in seconds, and (C) Number of slips. Values are the mean±SD from five different mice in each group (n = 5). *p < 0.05 vs control #p < 0.05 vs prediabetic.
Fig. 4Effect of ADF and AUDA on ROS and oxidative states (A) ROS production in sciatic nerve by HPLC (n = 3). (B) NADPH oxidase activity assay on sciatic nerve samples (n = 5). *p < 0.05 vs control #p < 0.05 vs prediabetic.
Fig. 5Protein expression levels of CYP1a1/1a2 in mice sciatic nerve. Representative Western blot of CYP1a1/1a2/HSC70 with representative densitometric quantification in mice sciatic nerve (n = 5).