Literature DB >> 17257284

Incidence of Type 2 diabetes in England and its association with baseline impaired fasting glucose: the Ely study 1990-2000.

N G Forouhi1, J Luan, S Hennings, N J Wareham.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the incidence of Type 2 diabetes and to examine the effect of different cut-points for impaired fasting glucose (IFG) on diabetes incidence.
METHODS: Population-based longitudinal study (1990-2000) with clinical, anthropometric and biochemical measurements, including an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), in 1040 non-diabetic adults aged 40-69 years at baseline. Baseline glucose status was defined as normoglycaemia < 5.6, IFG-lower 5.6-6.0 and IFG-original 6.1-6.9 mmol/l. The all-IFG group included fasting glucose values of 5.6-6.9 mmol/l.
RESULTS: The 10-year cumulative incidence of diabetes was 7.3 per 1000 person-years. Diabetes incidence was 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2, 4.8], 6.2 (4.0, 9.8) and 17.5 (12.5, 24.5) per 1000 person-years in those with normoglycaemia, IFG-lower and IFG-original, respectively. Compared with normoglycaemia, the age/sex-adjusted risk [hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI] for incident diabetes was greatest in the IFG-original category (HR 6.9; 3.1, 15.2) and increased to a lesser degree in the IFG-lower (HR 2.5; 1.1, 5.7) and all-IFG categories (HR 4.1; 1.9, 8.7). When adjusted for confounding factors, the magnitude and direction of associations persisted, with HR 1.9, 4.4 and 2.9, for the categories IFG-lower, IFG-original and all-IFG, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes incidence is more strongly related to IFG defined as fasting glucose between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/l than to the lower category of 5.6-6.0 mmol/l, or entire range of 5.6-6.9 mmol/l. Future studies should examine the association of IFG with cardiovascular outcomes, but for diabetes risk our study supports the use of the IFG cut-point at 6.1 mmol/l.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17257284     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02068.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  86 in total

1.  Different type 2 diabetes risk assessments predict dissimilar numbers at 'high risk': a retrospective analysis of diabetes risk-assessment tools.

Authors:  Benjamin J Gray; Richard M Bracken; Daniel Turner; Kerry Morgan; Michael Thomas; Sally P Williams; Meurig Williams; Sam Rice; Jeffrey W Stephens
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Strategies for preventing type 2 diabetes: an update for clinicians.

Authors:  Kaivan Khavandi; Halima Amer; Bashar Ibrahim; Jack Brownrigg
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Influence of Prediabetes on the Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Kidney Events.

Authors:  Naveen Rathi; Paul K Whelton; Glenn M Chertow; William C Cushman; Alfred K Cheung; Guo Wei; Robert Boucher; Paul L Kimmel; Adam P Bress; Holly J Kramer; Catreena Al-Marji; Tom Greene; Srinivasan Beddhu
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 4.  Prediabetes diagnosis and treatment: A review.

Authors:  Nidhi Bansal
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-03-15

5.  Incidence of register-based diabetes 10 years after a stepwise diabetes screening programme: the ADDITION-Denmark study.

Authors:  Signe S Rasmussen; Nanna B Johansen; Daniel R Witte; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Annelli Sandbaek; Torsten Lauritzen; Marit E Jørgensen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  General effect on high-risk persons when general practitioners are trained in intensive treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Signe S Rasmussen; Charlotte Glümer; Annelli Sandbaek; Torsten Lauritzen; Knut Borch-Johnsen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

7.  Incidence of type 2 diabetes using proposed HbA1c diagnostic criteria in the european prospective investigation of cancer-norfolk cohort: implications for preventive strategies.

Authors:  Parinya Chamnan; Rebecca K Simmons; Nita G Forouhi; Robert N Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas J Wareham; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  "Prediabetes": Are There Problems With This Label? No, We Need Heightened Awareness of This Condition!

Authors:  William T Cefalu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Determinants of progression from impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance to diabetes in a high-risk screened population: 3 year follow-up in the ADDITION study, Denmark.

Authors:  S S Rasmussen; C Glümer; A Sandbaek; T Lauritzen; K Borch-Johnsen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Population-based incidence of Type 2 diabetes and its associated risk factors: results from a six-year cohort study in Iran.

Authors:  Hadi Harati; Farzad Hadaegh; Navid Saadat; Fereidoun Azizi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.