| Literature DB >> 35402470 |
Bellam H Rajashekar Reddy1, Prashanth Thankachan1, Masoami Hatakayama2,3, Netravati Hiremath4, Diego Moretti5, Yellodu A Nanjareddy6, Mathi B Thumilan6, Ramapura L Ravikumar7, Shamprasad Phadnis7, Beena Bose1, Lucy Poveda3, Geetha Kalaiah4, Michael B Zimmermann5, Kentaro K Shimizu2, Ralph Schlapbach3, Anura V Kurpad1,8, Sheshshayee M Sreeman6.
Abstract
Iron deficiency and anemia are common in low- and middle-income countries. This is due to a poor dietary iron density and low iron absorption resulting from the high inhibitory phytic acid content in cereal and millet-based diets. Here, we report that a naturally occurring low phytic acid finger millet accession (571 mg 100 g-1), stable across three growing seasons with normal iron content (3.6 mg 100 g-1), increases iron absorption by 3-folds in normal Indian women. The accessions differing in grain phytic acid content, GE 2358 (low), and GE1004 (high) were selected from a core collection of 623 accessions. Whole genome re-sequencing of the accessions revealed significant single nucleotide variations segregating them into distinct clades. A non-synonymous mutation in the EcABCC phytic acid transporter gene between high and low accessions could affect gene function and result in phytic acid differences. The highly sensitive dual stable-isotope erythrocyte incorporation method was adopted to assess the fractional iron absorption. The low phytic acid accession resulted in a significantly higher iron absorption compared with the high phytic acid accession (3.7 vs. 1.3%, p < 0.05). The low phytic acid accession could be effective in preventing iron deficiency in regions where finger millet is habitually eaten. With its low water requirement, finger millet leaves low environmental footprints and hence would be an excellent sustainable strategy to mitigate iron deficiency.Entities:
Keywords: bioavailability; finger millet; grain phytic acid; iron deficiency anemia (IDA); stable isotope
Year: 2022 PMID: 35402470 PMCID: PMC8988890 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.791392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Comparison of mean, range, and variance for 19 quantitative traits in finger millet core collection (n = 623) and diversity panel (n = 350).
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | Ear head emergence (days) | 45.0–79.0 | 45.0–79.0 | 59.9 | 60.3 | 0.27 | 39.9 | 40.2 |
| 2 | Plant height (cm) | 45.0–146.0 | 45.0–146.0 | 94.4 | 95.5 | 0.34 | 278.6 | 329.2 |
| 3 | Productive tiller (no plant−1) | 1.4–8.4 | 1.4–8.4 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 0.15 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| 4 | Unproductive tiller (no plant−1) | 0.1–2.0 | 0.1–2.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 5 | Productive tiller ratio (%) | 60.0–100.0 | 60.0–100.0 | 90.4 | 90.0 | 0.44 | 48.5 | 55.3 |
| 6 | Leaf number (no plant−1) | 11.9–96.0 | 12.2–96.0 | 36.7 | 38.4 | 0.05 | 156.6 | 194.5 |
| 7 | Leaf area (cm2 plant−1) | 268.2–4685.1 | 277.1–4685.1 | 1256.4 | 1349.0 | 0.03 | 297747.1 | 406625.8 |
| 8 | Specific leaf weight (mg cm−2) | 0.5–10.0 | 0.5–10.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.49 | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 9 | Leaf dry weight (g plant−1) | 1.7–22.4 | 1.8–22.4 | 7.4 | 8.0 | 0.02 | 9.8 | 12.8 |
| 10 | Leaf area index | 0.9–15.6 | 0.9–15.6 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 0.03 | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| 11 | Stem dry weight (g plant−1) | 6.9–104.7 | 6.9–104.7 | 32.1 | 34.2 | 0.04 | 169.4 | 223.7 |
| 12 | Mean ear head weight (g ear−1) | 0.7–12.4 | 0.7–12.4 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 0.37 | 4.0 | 4.9 |
| 13 | Ear head weight (g plant−1) | 2.9–53.9 | 2.9–53.9 | 18.7 | 19.7 | 0.07 | 65.6 | 87.5 |
| 14 | Seed yield (g plant−1) | 2.0–43.4 | 2.0–43.4 | 13.7 | 14.4 | 0.11 | 38.3 | 51.2 |
| 15 | Total dry matter (g plant−1) | 11.5–181.1 | 11.5–181.1 | 58.6 | 62.5 | 0.03 | 517.1 | 695.7 |
| 16 | Threshing (%) | 41.9–90.9 | 42.1–89.7 | 72.9 | 72.4 | 0.31 | 57.4 | 63.8 |
| 17 | Test weight (g 1,000 seeds−1) | 1.0–3.6 | 1.0–3.6 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 0.79 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 18 | Harvest Index | 0.05–0.45 | 0.05–0.45 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.59 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 19 | Grain phytic acid (mg 100 g−1) | 488.6–951.0 | 497.1–951.0 | 738.0 | 727.9 | 0.10 | 8463.5 | 8269.2 |
Significantly different at p < 0.05 based on ANOVA and post-hoc Newman-Keuls test.
Descriptive statistics for GPA content in finger millet accessions across generations.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | Mean (mg 100 g−1) | 738 | 721 | 658 |
| 2 | Minimum (mg 100 g−1) | 489 | 497 | 478 |
| 3 | Maximum (mg 100 g−1) | 951 | 903 | 887 |
| 4 | Standard deviation (SD) | 92 | 90 | 80 |
| 5 | Standard error mean (SEM) | 9 | 9 | 12 |
| 6 | Coefficient of variation (CV) | 12.5 | 12.4 | 12.2 |
| 7 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
ANOVA was performed for GPA content and was significant at p < 0.05.
Estimates of genetic parameters for GPA content in finger millet core collection and diversity panel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | GV | 8493.1 | 7855.1 | 6199.5 |
| 2 | PV | 8738.6 | 8097.4 | 6637.7 |
| 3 | EV | 245.5 | 242.4 | 438.2 |
| 4 | GCV | 12.5 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| 5 | PCV | 12.7 | 12.5 | 12.4 |
| 6 | ECV | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3.2 |
| 7 | H2 | 97.2 | 97.0 | 93.4 |
| 8 | GAM (%) | 25.4 | 25.0 | 23.9 |
GV, PV, and EV, Genetic phenotypic and environmental variances; GCV, PCV, and ECV, Genetic, phenotypic and environment coefficient of variation; H.
Figure 1Correlation of GPA content in 275 finger millet accessions between two seasons (2015 and 2016). r2 = 0.472; r = 0.688, p < 0.001. Filled circles represent the accessions that were eventually selected for human iron absorption studies.
Figure 2Diversity and principal component analysis for 19 finger millet accessions. (A) Neighbor joining tree to assess the genetic relatedness among 19 finger millet accessions. Principal component analysis for 19 finger millet accessions with identified SNPs across 66 matching sequences for A sub-genome (B) and B sub-genome (C). Filled circles with different colors in scattered plots indicate the different accessions.
Figure 3Multiple sequence alignment of deduced amino acid sequence of EcABCC from GE2358, GE1004, PR202, and monocot crop species and domain search analysis of EcABCC. The amino acid indicated in red color is replaced amino acid in low GPA accession.
Baseline characteristics of the subjects.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Age (y) | 21.6 ± 3.0 (20–30) |
| 2 | Height (m) | 1.6 ± 0.1 (1.4–1.6) |
| 3 | Weight (kg) | 50.5 ± 4.2 (41.7–58.4) |
| 4 | BMI (kg M−2) | 20.5 ± 1.5 (18.9–23.0) |
| 5 | Hemoglobin (g dL−1) | 13.7 ± 0.8 (12.3–15.0) |
| 6 | Serum ferritin (μg L−1) | 25.2 ± 10.1 (11.7–40.7) |
| 7 | CRP (mg L−1) | 1.6 ± 2.1 (0.1–6.5) |
BMI, Body Mass Index; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Figure 4Fractional iron absorption from the low GPA and high GPA finger millet meals (ragi roti, n = 10). Both low and high GPA meals were administered to the same subject. Data points representing iron absorption of the same subject for high and low GPA test meals are connected with lines to illustrate the trend.
Figure 5Scatter plot of iron absorption against serum ferritin in low GPA accession GE 2358 and high GPA accession GE 1004 (n = 10). Filled circles: Low GPA content finger millet accession; r2 = 0.38, p = 0.056, iron absorption = (−0.108 × serum ferritin) + 6.75. Open circles: High GPA content finger millet accession. r2 = 0.15, p = 0.275, iron absorption = (−0.060 × serum ferritin) + 3.50.