Literature DB >> 35401912

BOUNDING THE LOCAL AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT IN AN INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ANALYSIS OF ENGAGEMENT WITH A MOBILE INTERVENTION.

Andrew J Spieker1, Robert A Greevy1, Lyndsay A Nelson2, Lindsay S Mayberry2.   

Abstract

Estimation of local average treatment effects in randomized trials typically relies upon the exclusion restriction assumption in cases where we are unwilling to rule out the possibility of unmeasured confounding. Under this assumption, treatment effects are mediated through the post-randomization variable being conditioned upon, and directly attributable to neither the randomization itself nor its latent descendants. Recently, there has been interest in mobile health interventions to provide healthcare support. Mobile health interventions such as the Rapid Encouragement/Education and Communications for Health (REACH), designed to support self-management for adults with type 2 diabetes, often involve both one-way and interactive messages. In practice, it is highly likely that any benefit from the intervention is achieved both through receipt of the intervention content and through engagement with/response to it. Application of an instrumental variable analysis in order to understand the role of engagement with REACH (or a similar intervention) requires the traditional exclusion restriction assumption to be relaxed. We propose a conceptually intuitive sensitivity analysis procedure for the REACH randomized trial that places bounds on local average treatment effects. Simulation studies reveal this approach to have desirable finite-sample behavior and to recover local average treatment effects under correct specification of sensitivity parameters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Causal; exclusion restriction; instrumental variables; sensitivity analysis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35401912      PMCID: PMC8992692          DOI: 10.1214/21-aoas1476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   1.959


  20 in total

1.  Toward Causal Inference With Interference.

Authors:  Michael G Hudgens; M Elizabeth Halloran
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies.

Authors:  D Y Lin; B M Psaty; R A Kronmal
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation.

Authors:  Michael Schomaker; Christian Heumann
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  BOUNDING THE LOCAL AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT IN AN INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ANALYSIS OF ENGAGEMENT WITH A MOBILE INTERVENTION.

Authors:  Andrew J Spieker; Robert A Greevy; Lyndsay A Nelson; Lindsay S Mayberry
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 1.959

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Reviews Evaluating Technology-Enabled Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.

Authors:  Deborah A Greenwood; Perry M Gee; Kathy J Fatkin; Malinda Peeples
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-31

6.  Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: a principled yet flexible approach.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Xiaomin Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Instrumental variable methods for causal inference.

Authors:  Michael Baiocchi; Jing Cheng; Dylan S Small
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Effects of a Tailored Text Messaging Intervention Among Diverse Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Evidence From the 15-Month REACH Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lyndsay A Nelson; Robert A Greevy; Andrew Spieker; Kenneth A Wallston; Tom A Elasy; Sunil Kripalani; Chad Gentry; Erin M Bergner; Lauren M LeStourgeon; Sarah E Williamson; Lindsay S Mayberry
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  A flexible, interpretable framework for assessing sensitivity to unmeasured confounding.

Authors:  Vincent Dorie; Masataka Harada; Nicole Bohme Carnegie; Jennifer Hill
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  The Impact of mHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  David Novillo-Ortiz; Milena Soriano Marcolino; João Antonio Queiroz Oliveira; Marcelo D'Agostino; Antonio Luiz Ribeiro; Maria Beatriz Moreira Alkmim
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.773

View more
  1 in total

1.  BOUNDING THE LOCAL AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT IN AN INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ANALYSIS OF ENGAGEMENT WITH A MOBILE INTERVENTION.

Authors:  Andrew J Spieker; Robert A Greevy; Lyndsay A Nelson; Lindsay S Mayberry
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 1.959

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.