| Literature DB >> 35401540 |
Siqi Cai1,2,3, Zezhong Zheng1,2,4, JiaoJiao Cheng1,2,3, Lintao Zhong1,2,5, Ran Shao1,2,4, Feiyan Zheng1,2,4, Zhiying Lai1,2,5, Jiajun Ou1,2,4, Liang Xu1,2,4, Pei Zhou1,2,4, Gang Lu1,2,5, Guihong Zhang1,2,3.
Abstract
African swine fever virus (ASFV) causes an acute, hemorrhagic, and highly contagious disease in domestic swine, leading to significant economic losses to the global porcine industry. Restriction factors of innate immunity play a critical in host antiviral action. However, function of swine restriction factors of innate immunity on ASFV has been seldomly investigated. In this study, we determined five homologues of swine interferon-induced transmembrane proteins (SwIFITM [named SwIFITM1a, -1b, -2, -3, and -5]), and we found that they all exhibit potent antiviral activity against ASFV. Expression profile analysis indicated that these SwIFITMs are constitutively expressed in most porcine tissues. Whether infected with ASFV or treated with swine interferon, the expression levels of SwIFITMs were induced in vitro. The subcellular localization of SwIFITMs was similar to that of their human homologues. SwIFITM1a and -1b localized to the plasma membrane, SwIFITM2 and -3 focused on the cytoplasm and the perinuclear region, while SwIFITM5 accumulated in the cell surface and cytoplasm. The overexpression of SwIFITM1a, -1b, -2, -3, or -5 could significantly inhibit ASFV replication in Vero cells, whereas knockdown of these genes could enhance ASFV replication in PAMs. We blocked the constitutive expression of endogenous IFITMs in Vero cells using a CRISPR-Cas9 system and then infected them with ASFV. The results indicated that the knockout of endogenous IFITMs could enhance ASFV replication. Finally, we expressed five SwIFITMs in knockout Vero cell lines and then challenged them with ASFV. The results showed that all of the SwIFITMs had a strong antiviral effect on ASFV. This research will further expand the understanding of the anti-ASFV activity of porcine IFITMs.Entities:
Keywords: African swine fever virus; antiviral effect; interferon-inducible transmembrane protein; restriction; swine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35401540 PMCID: PMC8989734 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.827709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Primers used for gene cloning and RT-qPCR detection.
| Gene | Primer sequence (5′–3′) | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| SwIFITM1a | F: ATGATCAAGAGCCAGCACG | Amplification of SwIFITM1a |
| R: CTAGTAGCCTCTGTTACTCTTTGC | ||
| SwIFITM1b | F: ATGCTCAGGGAGGAGCAC | Amplification of SwIFITM1b |
| R: CTAGTAGCCTCTGTTACTCTTTGC | ||
| SwIFITM2 | F: ATGAACTGCGCTTCCC | Amplification of SwIFITM2 |
| R: CTAGTAGCCTCTGTTACTCT | ||
| SwIFITM3 | F: ATGAACTGCGCTTCCCAG | Amplification of SwIFITM3 |
| R: CTAGTAGCCTCTGTAATCCTTTATG | ||
| SwIFITM5 | F: ATGAGCTCACCCCCAGAC | Amplification of SwIFITM5 |
| R: TCAGTCATAGTCTGAGTCGTCGAA | ||
| Sw-β-actin | F: CTGAACCCCAAAGCCAACCGT | RT-qPCR detection of swine β-actin |
| R: TTCTCCTTGATGTCCCGCACG | ||
| Sw-Mx1 | F: TCTGTAAGCAGGAGACCATCAACT | RT-qPCR detection of swine Mx1 |
| R: TTTCTCGCCACGTCCACTATC | ||
| SwIFITM1a | F: GGAGCCACTGTTCTTCTG | RT-qPCR detection of SwIFITM1a |
| R: TAGCCTCTGTTACTCTTTGC | ||
| SwIFITM1b | F: CGTCGCTCTTCTGGTGTT | RT-qPCR detection of SwIFITM1b |
| R: GTAGCCTCTGTTACTCTTTGC | ||
| SwIFITM2 | F: CATTCTGACCATCGGAGCCA | RT-qPCR detection of SwIFITM2 |
| R: TTTGCGCGCTCTAACATCTG | ||
| SwIFITM3 | F: TGCGTTCATCATCGTTTGCAC | RT-qPCR detection of SwIFITM3 |
| R: TATGAGCTGCAGAACTGCTTGG | ||
| SwIFITM5 | F: CCTCTACCTGAACCTGTG | RT-qPCR detection of SwIFITM5 |
| R: CAGCCACCTTCTGATCTC | ||
| ASFV p72 | F: ATAGAGATACAGCTCTTCCAG | RT-qPCR detection of ASFV |
| R: GTATGTAAGAGCTGCAGAAC | ||
| P: FAM-TATCGATAAGATTGAT-MGB | ||
| siRNA1a,1b,2 | CTGTTCTTCTGGTGTTTGT | siRNA targeting SwIFITM1a, -1b and -2 |
| siRNA3 | GCGTTCATCATCGTTTGCA | siRNA targeting SwIFITM3 |
| siRNA5 | CGCTGGCTTACTCCATCAA | siRNA targeting SwIFITM5 |
| Flag-tagged SwIFITM1a | F:CGGGGTACCGCCACCATGGATTACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGGGATCCATGATCAAGAGCCAGCACG | Amplification of FLAG-tagged SwIFITM1a |
| R:CCGGAATTCCTAGTAGCCTCTGTTACTCTTTGC | ||
| Flag-tagged SwIFITM1b | F:CGGGGTACCGCCACCATGGATTACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGGGATCCATGCTCAGGGAGGAGCAC | Amplification of FLAG-tagged SwIFITM1b |
| R:CCGGAATTCCTAGTAGCCTCTGTTACTCTTTGC | ||
| Flag-tagged SwIFITM2 | F:CGGGGTACCGCCACCATGGATTACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGGGATCCATGAACTGCGCTTCCC | Amplification of FLAG-tagged SwIFITM2 |
| R:CCGGAATTCCTAGTAGCCTCTGTTACTCT | ||
| Flag-tagged SwIFITM3 | F:CGGGGTACCGCCACCATGGATTACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGGGATCCATGAACTGCGCTTCCCAG | Amplification of FLAG-tagged SwIFITM3 |
| R:CCGGAATTCCTAGTAGCCTCTGTAATCCTTTATG | ||
| Flag-tagged SwIFITM5 | F:CGGGGTACCGCCACCATGGATTACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGGGATCCCCTCTACCTGAACCTGTG | Amplification of FLAG-tagged SwIFITM5 |
| R:CCGGAATTCTCAGTCATAGTCTGAGTCGTCGAA | ||
| sgRNA-1 | GATGGTTGGCGATGTGACCG | sgRNA targeting exon 1 of csIFITM1 |
| sgRNA-3 | GTGGTGAGTGCAATCGTCACA | sgRNA targeting exon 1 of csIFITM3 |
| sgRNA-5 | GGACACCGCGTATCCCCGCG | sgRNA targeting exon 1 of csIFITM5 |
| csIFITM1 | F: TCAACTGGTGCTGCCTGGG | Detection of knock out of csIFITM1 |
| R: ATCACAAGCACGTGCACTTTA | ||
| csIFITM3 | F: AGAGCAATTCTCCCTACAGC | Detection of knock out of csIFITM3 |
| R: CGCCCTTTCACAGAACTACTG | ||
| csIFITM5 | F: AGAGACGGCGCTGGAACCCATGGA | Detection of knock out of csIFITM5 |
| R: CCTCCCAATGACCTCTGTGC |
F, Forward; R, Reverse; P, Probe.
Figure 1The expression level of SwIFITMs. (A) Expression levels of SwIFITMs in different porcine tissues were normalized by β-actin mRNA. (B) Expression levels of SwIFITMs in PAMs were normalized by β-actin mRNA and SwIFITM3 served as a control. (C) Expression levels of SwIFITMs in PAMs after treatment with IFN-α for 24 h were compared with untreated PAM mRNA, Mx1 served as a control. (D) Expression levels of SwIFITMs in PAMs after being infected with ASFV for 24 h were compared with untreated PAM mRNA. (E) Expression levels of SwIFITMs in PAMs after being infected with ASFV (0.1 MOI) each 6 h from 0 to 36 hpi. All samples were analyzed in triplicate, and three independent experiments were performed. * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001 vs negative control group. Error bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 2Subcellular localization of SwIFITMs in PK-15 cells and Vero cells. The cell nucleus, expression of SwIFITM1a, -1b, -2, -3, and -5 proteins, and LAMP1-positive late endosomes (red) in (A) PK-15 cells and (B) Vero cells are indicated by blue, green, and red, respectively.
Figure 3Knockdown of SwIFITMs enhances ASFV replication. (A) SwIFITM mRNA expression levels were evaluated in PAMs 24 h after transfection of 50 nmol of siRNA1a, 1b, 2, or negative control. (B) SwIFITM mRNA expression levels were evaluated in PAMs 24 h after transfection of 50 nmol of siRNA3 or negative control. (C) SwIFITM mRNA expression levels were evaluated in PAMs 24 h after transfection of 50 nmol of siRNA5 or negative control. siRNAs were transfected into PAMs separately for 24 h and then infected with 0.1 MOI of ASFV; the virus replication level of ASFV was determined by (D) RT-qPCR and (E) western blotting with β-actin used as a control at 36 hpi; (F) WB quantification by densitometry for each viral protein and β-actin, and the density quantitative ratios of each viral protein and β-actin were calculated; (G) the viral titration of progeny virus was tested in HAD assay. Samples were analyzed in triplicate, and three independent experiments were performed. ** p < 0.01; *** p<0.001; **** p<0.0001 vs negative control group. Error bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 4Overexpression of SwIFITMs Inhibits ASFV replication. pEF-SwIFITMs with FLAG tags were transfected into WT Vero cells separately for 24 h and then infected with 0.1 MOI of ASFV; (A) the cells viability was detected by cell proliferation assay; (B, C) the virus replication levels of ASFV were determined by western blotting at 36 hpi, and band densitometry for each protein was determined, and the density quantitative ratios of each viral or SwIFITM protein and β-actin were calculated, ratio of SwIFITM protein and β-actin served as a control; (D) the expression levels of p72 protein were detected by RT-qPCR with β-actin used as a control at 36 hpi; (E) the viral titration of progeny virus was tested in HAD assay. Samples were analyzed in triplicate, and three independent experiments were performed. ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001; vs empty vector control group. Error bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 5Generation and validation of csIFITM knockout Vero cell lines. (A) Three different sgRNA targeting sites and the result of sanger sequencing with WT and csIFITMs− Vero cells. (B) Expression of endogenous csIFITMs was detected by western blotting with β-actin used as a control. (C) Proliferation of csIFITMs−, control, and untreated Vero cells were detected by the CCK-8 Cell Counting method. The csIFITMs−, control, and untreated Vero cells were infected with 0.1 MOI of ASFV; (D, E) the virus replication levels of ASFV were determined by western blotting at 36 hpi, and band densitometry for each protein was determined, and the density quantitative ratios of each viral or SwIFITM protein and β-actin were calculated, ratio of SwIFITM protein and β-actin served as a control; (F) the expression levels of p72 protein were detected by RT-qPCR with β-actin used as a control at 36 hpi; (G) the viral titration of progeny virus was tested in HAD assay. Samples were analyzed in triplicate, and three independent experiments were performed. ** p < 0.01; *** p<0.001 vs empty vector control group. Error bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 6Antiviral effect of SwIFITMs on ASFV. pEF-SwIFITMs with FLAG stag were transfected into csIFITMs− Vero cells separately for 24 h and then infected with 0.1 MOI of ASFV; (A) the cells viability was detected by cell proliferation assay; (B, C) the virus replication levels of ASFV were determined by western blotting at 36 hpi, and band densitometry for each protein was determined, and the density quantitative ratios of each viral or SwIFITM protein and β-actin were calculated, ratio of SwIFITM protein and β-actin served as a control; (D) the expression levels of p72 protein were detected by RT-qPCR with β-actin used as a control at 36 hpi; (E) the viral titration of progeny virus was tested in HAD assay. Samples were analyzed in triplicate, and three independent experiments were performed. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p<0.001 vs empty vector control group. Error bars indicate standard deviation.