Literature DB >> 35400517

COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptability Among Pregnant Women in Northern Nigeria.

Zubairu Iliyasu1, Jessica M Perkins2, Fatima I Tsiga-Ahmed3, Hadiza S Galadanci3, Abubakar M Jibo3, Taiwo G Amole3, Amina A Umar3, Hadiza M Abdullahi3, Aminatu A Kwaku3, Hamisu M Salihu4, Muktar H Aliyu5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35400517      PMCID: PMC8926305          DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


× No keyword cloud information.
Increasing vaccine uptake among pregnant women is a critical part of combating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The prevalence and correlates of vaccine acceptance among pregnant women in Nigeria are unknown. We assessed acceptability and correlates of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic in Nigeria. The study was conducted at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital in Nigeria, a 750-bed referral facility serving ∼13 million people. Systematic sampling was used to recruit consenting pregnant women upon arrival for antenatal care (n = 420). Quantitative data were collected using an adapted, interviewer-administered, structured questionnaire. , A variable representing vaccine acceptability was created based on a 5-point Likert scale (very keen = 1 to against it = 5). Vaccine acceptability was defined as “yes” if a respondent answered “very keen” or “pretty positive” and “no” for any other response. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess factors independently associated with vaccine acceptability. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed. Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic and omnibus tests were used to determine model fitness. Among the 420 pregnant women invited to participate, 399 (95.0%) completed the survey-based interview. The median gestational age of respondents was 32 weeks (interquartile range: 24–36). Among respondents, 359 (90.0%) were of Hausa-Fulani ethnicity, 373 (93.5%) were Muslim, 280 (70.2%) had two or more children, and 356 (89.2%) had completed at least secondary education. Most (312 [78.2%]) had received at least one dose of tetanus toxoid during the current pregnancy. Overall, 283 respondents (70.9%) thought that pregnant women affected by COVID-19 could become very sick. Similarly, 296 respondents (74.2%) were worried about the effects of COVID-19 on their unborn babies. However, only 74 respondents (18.6%) considered themselves to be at high risk for COVID-19 infection. In terms of protection, 236 respondents (59.1%) thought that COVID-19 vaccination could reduce their risk of contracting COVID-19, and 222 (55.6%) believed that the vaccine would reduce risk for the unborn baby. Most respondents were worried about vaccine side effects, efficacy, and safety. For example, 339 (85.0%) and 360 (90.2%) were worried about safety and side effects, respectively. Additionally, 149 (37.3%) were concerned about infertility-related rumors. Half of the respondents (200 [50.1%]) reported that they would consider vaccination if recommended by their doctor. However, only 135 respondents (33.8%) would accept the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. One-quarter (106 [26.6%]) reported that they would only take it after delivery, and 93 (23.3%) would delay vaccination until after weaning the baby off breast milk. The respondent’s religion, number of living children, education, income, gestational age at booking, self-assessed health status, risk perception, and vaccine safety concerns were independently associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptability (Table, Appendix). For example, non-Muslim respondents had a four-fold increased likelihood of accepting the vaccine during pregnancy. Similarly, respondents with primary education were 6 times more likely to accept the vaccine. Furthermore, primigravid women and those who booked early (≤12 weeks gestational age) for antenatal care had 3-fold increased odds of accepting COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. Women who received tetanus toxoid in the current pregnancy and those who self-assessed their health status as “good” or “very good” had at least a 4-fold increased likelihood of accepting the COVID-19 vaccine. Finally, pregnant women who were not concerned about COVID-19 vaccine safety were 8 times more likely to accept the vaccine.
Supplemental Table

Logistic regression model for predictors of acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women attending AKTH, Kano, Nigeria (n = 399)

CharacteristicsAdjusted OR (95% CI)P value
Religion
 IslamReferent
 Christianity4.08 (1.53–10.91)0.007a
Education
 Less than primaryReferent
 Completed primary6.21 (1.08–35.69)0.011a
 Completed secondary or more1.46 (0.33–6.39)0.69
Monthly income (Naira)
 <30 000Referent
 ≥30 0001.76 (1.14–3.26)0.034a
Number of living children
 02.88 (1.13–7.34)0.018a
 11.19 (0.58–2.42)0.74
 2–41.24 (0.54–2.84)0.97
 ≥5Referent
Gestational age at booking, wk
 ≤123.00 (1.71–5.27)0.002a
 23–28Referent
Current gestational age, wk
 13–281.46 (0.82–2.63)0.20
 29–40Referent
Tetanus toxoid immunization in current pregnancy
 Yes6.90 (2.70–17.63)<0.001a
 NoReferent
Self-assessed health status
 Very good5.15 (1.65–16.07)<0.001a
 Good4.04 (2.34–7.01)0.007a
 FairReferent
COVID-19 risk perception
 High1.24 (1.07–2.74)0.037a
 LowReferent
Concerned about COVID-19 vaccine safety
 YesReferent
 No8.30 (4.41–15.62)0.007a
Concerned about COVID-19 vaccine efficacy
 YesReferent
 No1.41 (0.41–4.87)0.59
Concerned about side effects of COVID-19 vaccine
 YesReferent
 No1.70 (0.43–6.77)0.45

Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 5.63; P = 0.73. Models adjusted for age.

Significant at P < 0.05

In conclusion, we found low COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women seeking antenatal care in Nigeria. Vaccine acceptability was associated with several sociodemographic and health-related factors. Our findings present an opportunity for public health action to reduce misconceptions about the COVID-19 vaccine. Our results will inform the design of interventions to build trust and boost COVID-19 vaccine confidence among pregnant women in similar settings.
  3 in total

1.  COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: the Oxford coronavirus explanations, attitudes, and narratives survey (Oceans) II.

Authors:  Daniel Freeman; Bao S Loe; Andrew Chadwick; Cristian Vaccari; Felicity Waite; Laina Rosebrock; Lucy Jenner; Ariane Petit; Stephan Lewandowsky; Samantha Vanderslott; Stefania Innocenti; Michael Larkin; Alberto Giubilini; Ly-Mee Yu; Helen McShane; Andrew J Pollard; Sinéad Lambe
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 7.723

2.  COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics.

Authors:  Michaël Schwarzinger; Verity Watson; Pierre Arwidson; François Alla; Stéphane Luchini
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2021-02-06

Review 3.  COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy and Lactation: Current Research and Gaps in Understanding.

Authors:  Lydia L Shook; Parisa N Fallah; Jason N Silberman; Andrea G Edlow
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 5.293

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine and associated factors among pregnant women.

Authors:  Firomsa Bekele; Birbirsa Sefera; Yadeta Babu
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-28

2.  A Mixed-Methods Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Its Determinants Among Pregnant Women in Northeast Ethiopia.

Authors:  Zenebe Tefera; Mandefro Assefaw
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 2.314

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.