| Literature DB >> 35399645 |
Mater H Mahnashi1, Yahya S Alqahtani1, Bandar A Alyami1, Ali O Alqarni1, Mohammad Ahmed Alshrahili2, Mahrous A Abou-Salim3, Mohammed N Alqahtani4, Sadaf Mushtaq5, Abdul Sadiq6, Muhammad Saeed Jan7.
Abstract
Background. The current study aims to give a scientific origin for employing Habenaria plantaginea Lindl. as a potential candidate against nociception, inflammation, and pyrexia. The pharmacological studies were performed on crude extract and subfractions. In the gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy analysis, a total of 21 compounds were identified. The plant samples were displayed for in vitro anti-inflammatory potentials. The observed IC50 for chloroform against cyclooxygenase-2 and 5-lipoxygenase enzymes was 33.81 and 26.74 μg/mL, respectively. The in vivo activities were prerequisites with the acute toxicity studies. In carrageenan-induced inflammation, the chloroform fraction exhibited 46.15% inhibition similar to that of standard drug diclofenac sodium 47.15%. Likewise, in the acetic acid-induced writhing test, the ethyl acetate fraction displayed 71.42% activity, which was dose-dependent as that of standard drug. In Brewer's yeast-induced antipyretic activity, a significant decrease in rectal volume was observed after 30, 60, and 90 minutes. Moreover, the results of this study indicated that the chloroform and ethyl acetate fractions inhibited nociception, inflammation, and pyrexia dose dependently. Likewise, mechanistic insights indicated that naloxone antagonized the antinociceptive effect of chloroform and ethyl acetate fractions, thereby signifying the involvement of opioidergic mechanisms respectively. These results suggest that these molecules present in this plant have synergistically beneficial potential for the cure and management of analgesia, inflammation, and pyrexia.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35399645 PMCID: PMC8989558 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7921408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the in vivo experimental animal design.
Figure 2Identified compounds' structures in Habenaria plantaginea.
GC-MS details of identified compounds.
| S. no. | Chemical name | Common name/synonym | Formula |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1-Methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2yl)cyclohexyl acetate | Beta-terpinyl acetate | C12H20O2 |
| 2 | 1-Methyl-4-(6-methyl hept-5-en-2-yl)benzene | Alpha-curcumene | C15H22 |
| 3 | 1-Isopropyl-4,7-dimethyl-1,2,4a,5,6,8a-hexahydronaphthalene | Not identified | C15H24 |
| 4 | 2-(4-Methylcyclohex-3-enyl)propan-2-0l | Alpha-terpineol | C10H18O |
| 5 | 1-Methyl-4-(6-methylhepta-1,5-dien-2-yl)cyclohex-1-ene |
| C15H24 |
| 6 | 1-Isopropyl-4,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydronaphthalen-4a-ol | Cadina-1(6),4-diene | C15H26O |
| 7 | Spiro[androst-5-ene-17,1′cyclobutan]-2′one,3-htdroxy- | Not identified | C22H32O2 |
| 8 | (Z)-1-Methyl-4-(6-methylhepta-2,5-dien-2-yl)-7-oxa-bicyclo[4.1.0]heptane | Not identified | C15H24O |
| 9 | 2,7,7-Trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol | Isoborneol | C10H18O |
| 10 | 1,1,4,7-Tetramethyl-decahydro-1 | Viridiflorol | C15H26O |
| 11 | 1,1,4,7-Tetramethyl-decahydro-1 | Globulol | C15H26O |
| 12 | 4-Isopropyl-1,6-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,7,8,8a-octahydronaphthalen-1-ol |
| C15H26O |
| 13 | 4,6-Dimetylcyclohex-1-enecarbaldehyde | Not identified | C9H14O |
| 14 | Spiro [4.5]dec-6-en-8-0ne, 1,7-dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)- | Acorenone 1 | C15H24O |
| 15 | (Z)-3-isoropyl-6,8 a-dimethyl-1,2,3,3a,4,5,8,8a-octahydroazulen-3a-ol | Bullnesol | C15H26O |
| 16 | (E)-3,7-dim ethylocta-1,5,7-trien-3-one | Hotrienol | C10H14O |
| 17 | (E)-3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dienal | Not identified | C10H16O |
| 18 | Methyl octadeca-2,5-diynoate | Methyl 2,5-octadecadiynoate | C19H30O2 |
| 19 | (E)-3,7-dim ethylocta-2,6-dienyl acetate | 1-Octanol | C12H20O2 |
| 20 | Ethyl pentadecanoate |
| C17H34O2 |
| 21 | (1,2,6a,6b,9,9,12a-heptamethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,6a,6b,7,8,8a,9,10,11,12,12a,12b,13,14b-icosahydropicen-4a yl)methanol | Not identified | C30H50O |
| 22 | 10,13-Dimethyl-2-methylene-17-(6-methylheptan-2-yl)-hexadecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-ol | Not identified | C28H48O |
Results of in vitro cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase inhibitory activity.
| Name | Concentration | COX-2% inhibition (mean ± SEM) | COX-2 IC50 ( | 5-LOX % inhibition (mean ± SEM) | 5-LOX IC50 ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hp. Chf | 1000 | 77.40 ± 0.25 | 33.81 | 81.73 ± 0.37 | 26.74 |
| 500 | 72.41 ± 0.30 | 75.27 ± 1.37 | |||
| 250 | 65.79 ± 1.28 | 69.62 ± 0.11 | |||
| 125 | 61.32 ± 0.68 | 63.81 ± 0.51 | |||
| 62.5 | 56.49 ± 0.73 | 59.08 ± 0.12 | |||
| Hp. EtAc | 1000 | 76.38 ± 0.76 | 87.56 | 80.47 ± 0.70 | 67.51 |
| 500 | 69.37 ± 0.52 | 73.57 ± 0.43 | |||
| 250 | 62.90 ± 1.16 | 65.12 ± 0.94 | |||
| 125 | 54.48 ± 0.54 | 57.76 ± 1.09 | |||
| 62.5 | 45.56 ± 0.69 | 49.38 ± 0.50 | |||
| Hp. Cr | 1000 | 65.94 ± 0.71 | 200 | 71.50 ± 0.56 | 106.99 |
| 500 | 58.28 ± 0.54 | 65.40 ± 0.55 | |||
| 250 | 52.65 ± 0.91 | 59.36 ± 0.57 | |||
| 125 | 45.30 ± 0.55 | 51.30 ± 0.52 | |||
| 62.5 | 37.63 ± 0.98 | 44.37 ± 0.58 | |||
| Hp. Hex | 1000 | 64.55 ± 0.51 | 217.93 | 66.42 ± 0.46 | 171.05 |
| 500 | 57.55 ± 0.67 | 60.53 ± 0.41 | |||
| 250 | 51.40 ± 0.44 | 52.68 ± 0.64 | |||
| 125 | 45.67 ± 0.55 | 47.46 ± 0.47 | |||
| 62.5 | 37.33 ± 0.62 | 40.51 ± 0.62 | |||
| Hp. Bt | 1000 | 60.35 ± 0.51 | 438.39 | 63.45 ± 0.59 | 328.34 |
| 500 | 51.27 ± 0.58 | 55.49 ± 0.60 | |||
| 250 | 43.41 ± 0.55 | 46.23 ± 0.44 | |||
| 125 | 34.40 ± 0.76 | 37.50 ± 0.61 | |||
| 62.5 | 27.24 ± 0.80 | 31.47 ± 0.46 | |||
| Hp. Aq | 1000 | 68.83 ± 1.07 | 141.2 | 72.37 ± 0.54 | 132.27 |
| 500 | 61.39 ± 0.60 | 64.00 ± 0.20 | |||
| 250 | 56.58 ± 0.56 | 57.15 ± 0.91 | |||
| 125 | 49.29 ± 0.43 | 51.15 ± 0.61 | |||
| 62.5 | 41.37 ± 0.58 | 40.40 ± 0.68 | |||
| Celecoxib | 1000 | 84.51 ± 0.30 | 23.20 | — | — |
| 500 | 77.84 ± 0.27 | ||||
| 250 | 73.50 ± 2.26 | ||||
| 125 | 65.74 ± 0.16 | ||||
| 62.5 | 61.56 ± 0.28 | ||||
| Montelukast | 1000 | — | — | 87.66 ± 0.45 | 17.47 |
| 500 | 81.64 ± 0.42 | ||||
| 250 | 76.01 ± 1.61 | ||||
| 125 | 70.46 ± 0.32 | ||||
| 62.5 | 64.50 ± 0.02 |
The values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5). The asterisk shows that the significance levels in comparison with that of the negative control. Data were analyzed via two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's posttest. P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001.
Group of animals and drug quantities are given for acute toxicity studies with various fractions of H. plantaginea.
| Groups | Animals | Conc. ( |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 25 |
| 2 | 5 | 50 |
| 3 | 5 | 100 |
| 4 | 5 | 200 |
| 5 | 5 | 300 |
| 6 | 5 | 400 |
| 7 | 5 | 500 |
| 8 | 5 | 1000 |
| 9 | 5 | 2000 |
Figure 3Analgesic activities through acetic acid-induced writhing potential in mice. The data were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). Data were analyzed via two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's posttest. P < 0.001. ###Comparison of standard drug to the normal saline group.
Antinociceptive activity of H. plantaginea assessed using the hot plate test.
| Treatment | Dose (mg/kg) | Latency time in seconds (mean ± SEM) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After 30 min | After 60 min | After 90 min | ||
| Normal saline | 10 ml/kg | 9.03 ± 0.40 | 10.05 ± 0.30 | 8.67 ± 0.65 |
| Standard | 5 mg/kg | 17.23 ± 0.33 | 19.56 ± 0.52 | 13.27 ± 0.25 |
| Hp. Chf | 100 mg/kg | 14.33 ± 0.44 | 16.17 ± 0.42 | 11.25 ± 0.52 |
| Hp. EtAc | 100 mg/kg | 12.83 ± 0.52 | 14.00 ± 0.10 | 8.83 ± 0.80 |
The data represent analgesic activities through hot plate test in mice. The data were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6) analyzed via two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's posttest. P < 0.05; P < 0.01; P < 0.001; and ns: not significant.
Results of analgesic activity following hot plate model and opioid receptors evaluation study.
| Samples | Dose (mg/kg) | Reaction time on hot plate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | ||
| Normal saline | 10 ml/kg | 10.12 ± 0.42 | 10.12 ± 0.57 | 10.12 ± 0.33 |
| Normal saline + NLX | 10 ml/kg + 1 | 10.14 ± 0.71 | 10.14 ± 0.47 | 10.14 ± 0.60 |
| Morphine | 5 | 21.64 ± 0.59 | 23.64 ± 0.70 | 19.64 ± 0.60 |
| Morphine + NLX | 5 + 1 | 14.26 ± 0.94 | 16.60 ± 0.66 | 12.40 ± 0.88 |
| Hp. EtAc | 100 | 19.96 ± 0.05 | 22.26 ± 0.04 | 24.80 ± 0.07 |
| Hp. EtAc + NLX | 100 + 1 | 11.30 ± 0.03 | 13.70 ± 0.09 | 16.60 ± 0.48 |
| Hp. Chf | 100 | 20.42 ± 0.08 | 25.60 ± 0.05 | 28.10 ± 0.55 |
| Hp. Chf + NLX | 100 + 1 | 8.53 ± 0.30 | 9.98 ± 0.59 | 14.40 ± 0.71 |
While after 60 minutes, the standard drug tramadol possesses a significant result (P < 0.01). Hp. Chf and Hp. EtAc fractions displayed dose-dependent result causing 61.01 ± 0.45 (P < 0.001) and 38.45 ± 0.50 (P < 0.01) analgesic effect at the dose of 100 mg/kg. Similarly, after 90 minutes, tramadol again exhibited a significant result (P < 0.01), while tested fraction Hp. EtAc has 33.06 ± 0.33 (P < 0.01)% potential. Likewise, tested fraction Hp. Chf at 100 mg/kg body weight exhibited dose-dependent results as that f the standard drug causing 48.75 ± 0.56 (P < 0.001)% inhibitions.
Figure 4Carrageenan-induced anti-inflammatory potential in mice. The data were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). Data were analyzed via two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's posttest. P < 0.001.
Figure 5Anti-inflammatory activities through Brewer's yeast-induced pyrexia in mice. The data were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). Data were analyzed via two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's posttest. P < 0.001.