Literature DB >> 19338987

Hypertensive pregnancy complications in poor and normal responders after in vitro fertilization.

Jeroen van Disseldorp1, Rene Eijkemans, Bart Fauser, Frank Broekmans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether women pregnant after a poor response in IVF have pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia more frequently than women with pregnancies after a normal response in IVF. Poor response to ovarian stimulation for IVF reflects advanced ovarian aging, which may be associated with early vascular aging. This may become apparent in an increased incidence of hypertensive pregnancy complications in pregnancies achieved after poor response in IVF.
DESIGN: Patient-control study.
SETTING: Tertiary Fertility Center. PATIENT(S): One hundred fifty poor (three oocytes or fewer) and 150 normal responders (8-12 oocytes) pregnant after IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), matched for age, type of infertility, dose of recombinant FSH, singleton or twin pregnancy, and IVF or ICSI treatment. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary end points were birth weight of the neonate and the incidence of pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders. Secondary end points were duration of pregnancy, type of delivery, and live birth of the neonate. RESULT(S): Poor and normal responders did not have significantly different incidences in pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders, nor did their neonates differ significantly in birth weight. Moreover, duration of pregnancy, type of delivery, and live birth ratios were similar in both poor and normal responders. CONCLUSION(S): From this matched control study we were unable to confirm our hypothesis, that women pregnant after a poor response in IVF have pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia more frequently than women with pregnancies after a normal response in IVF. These results do not support a vascular etiology of poor response. Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19338987     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

1.  Preconception ovarian reserve and placenta-mediated pregnancy complications among infertile women.

Authors:  Wendy Vitek; Jinhee Oh; Omar Mbowe; Sally W Thurston; Mindy S Christianson; Aaron K Styer; Alex J Polotsky; Michael P Diamond; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.899

2.  Assisted reproductive technology treatment increases obstetric and neonatal risks over that of the underlying infertility diagnosis.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Chia-Ling Liu; Xiaohui Cui; Howard J Cabral; Leslie V Farland; Charles Coddington; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 7.490

3.  Identifying women with indicators of subfertility in a statewide population database: operationalizing the missing link in assisted reproductive technology research.

Authors:  Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Mark D Hornstein; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Demographic characteristics and clinical profile of poor responders in IVF / ICSI: A comparative study.

Authors:  Nabaneeta Padhy; Shalu Gupta; Asmita Mahla; M Latha; Thangam Varma
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2010-05

5.  Correlation between luteinizing hormone receptor gene expression in human granulosa cells with oocyte quality in poor responder patients undergoing  in vitro fertilization: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Budi Wiweko; M Luky Satria; Kresna Mutia; Pritta Ameilia Iffanolida; Achmad Kemal Harzif; Gita Pratama; R Muharam; Andon Hestiantoro
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-04

6.  Analysis of factors associated with ovarian reserve in a group of poor responders to in vitro fertilization: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Budi Wiweko; Quamila Fahrizani Afdi; Achmad Kemal Harzif; Gita Pratama; Kanadi Sumapradja; Raden Muharam; Andon Hestiantoro; Sarah Chairani Zakirah
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2020-12-21

7.  Decreasing quality of the new generations of anti-Müllerian hormone assays.

Authors:  Krzysztof Lukaszuk; Beata Ludwikowska; Joanna Liss; Michal Kunicki; Miroslaw Sawczak; Aron Lukaszuk; Lukasz Plociennik; Grzegorz Jakiel; Tomasz Wasniewski; Izabela Woclawek-Potocka; Dorota Bialobrzeska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.