Literature DB >> 35396248

Global disparity bias in ophthalmology artificial intelligence applications.

Luis Filipe Nakayama1, Ashley Kras2, Lucas Zago Ribeiro3, Fernando Korn Malerbi3, Luis Salles Mendonça3,4, Leo Anthony Celi5,6, Caio Vinicius Saito Regatieri3, Nadia K Waheed4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; public health informatics

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35396248      PMCID: PMC8996038          DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform        ISSN: 2632-1009


× No keyword cloud information.
Machine learning (ML) is a branch of artificial intelligence (AI) that performs a classification, prediction and/or optimisation task. Similar to brain neurons, neural networks output a label after multiple information layers connection, resembling human thinking.1 AI is already influencing care in many areas, such as radiology, pathology, dermatology and ophthalmology. In ophthalmology, a variety of multimodal imaging examinations are fundamental in the screening, diagnosis and monitoring of diseases and provide data input for AI development.2 Some applications, such as the IDx Technologies (Coralville, USA) which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration 3 years ago, are already used in clinical practice as a screening tool.2 3 Surprisingly, algorithms can even predict gender, age and cardiovascular risk through retinal images.2 4 5 AI may reduce subjectivity and interobserver disagreement in clinical practice.1 Especially in low-income (LIC) and low-to-medium-income countries (LMIC), preventable blindness causes such as diabetic retinopathy (DR) and age-related macular degeneration could be prevented with screening programmes, home monitoring systems or telemedicine. AI-based screening could systematise screening and improve eye care in remote areas.6 ML requires high-quality, well-labelled, representative and large datasets, but at present, ophthalmological ML-ready datasets are only available in a few countries. One hundred seventy-two countries do not have representation in training and validation cohorts.7 Although data from all world countries are a distant goal, equivalent representation of all continents, ethnicities and the maximum number of countries is desired to reduce ML bias. Demographic information and other social determinants of health are typically not contained in these datasets, making it challenging to interrogate algorithms for bias.7 8 High-quality data are also fundamental for environmental-specific algorithm validation, which is essential before AI implementation. Available automated DR algorithm performance varies considerably in performance in the real world due to limited training data, including heterogeneity in disease presentations and suboptimal image quality.9 In addition, diverse sociodemographic and ethnic representation are necessary if generalisability is a goal.8 In LICs and LMICs, there is a growing gap between the ophthalmologist workforce and the population size. Two-thirds of ophthalmologists live in only 17 countries and in those countries, most practice in the urban centres.10 AI applications can expand access to eye care and may reduce preventable blindness, which is currently 80% of cases. In addition to diversifying datasets to build AI technology in healthcare, we must invest in building capacity for health informatics and data science across countries. International collaboration between research groups should be incentivised to narrow disparities in AI research in order to reduce world blindness.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Deployment of Artificial Intelligence in Real-World Practice: Opportunity and Challenge.

Authors:  Mingguang He; Zhixi Li; Chi Liu; Danli Shi; Zachary Tan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Accelerating ophthalmic artificial intelligence research: the role of an open access data repository.

Authors:  Ashley Kras; Leo A Celi; John B Miller
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning.

Authors:  Ryan Poplin; Avinash V Varadarajan; Katy Blumer; Yun Liu; Michael V McConnell; Greg S Corrado; Lily Peng; Dale R Webster
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 4.  A global review of publicly available datasets for ophthalmological imaging: barriers to access, usability, and generalisability.

Authors:  Saad M Khan; Xiaoxuan Liu; Siddharth Nath; Edward Korot; Livia Faes; Siegfried K Wagner; Pearse A Keane; Neil J Sebire; Matthew J Burton; Alastair K Denniston
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-10-01

5.  Generalisability through local validation: overcoming barriers due to data disparity in healthcare.

Authors:  William Greig Mitchell; Edward Christopher Dee; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Predicting sex from retinal fundus photographs using automated deep learning.

Authors:  Edward Korot; Nikolas Pontikos; Xiaoxuan Liu; Siegfried K Wagner; Livia Faes; Josef Huemer; Konstantinos Balaskas; Alastair K Denniston; Anthony Khawaja; Pearse A Keane
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Multicenter, Head-to-Head, Real-World Validation Study of Seven Automated Artificial Intelligence Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Systems.

Authors:  Aaron Y Lee; Ryan T Yanagihara; Cecilia S Lee; Marian Blazes; Hoon C Jung; Yewlin E Chee; Michael D Gencarella; Harry Gee; April Y Maa; Glenn C Cockerham; Mary Lynch; Edward J Boyko
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices.

Authors:  Michael D Abràmoff; Philip T Lavin; Michele Birch; Nilay Shah; James C Folk
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2018-08-28

9.  Estimated number of ophthalmologists worldwide (International Council of Ophthalmology update): will we meet the needs?

Authors:  Serge Resnikoff; Van Charles Lansingh; Lindsey Washburn; William Felch; Tina-Marie Gauthier; Hugh R Taylor; Kristen Eckert; David Parke; Peter Wiedemann
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Health Economic and Safety Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Applications in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening.

Authors:  Yuchen Xie; Dinesh V Gunasekeran; Konstantinos Balaskas; Pearse A Keane; Dawn A Sim; Lucas M Bachmann; Carl Macrae; Daniel S W Ting
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.283

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Operationalising fairness in medical algorithms.

Authors:  Sonali Parbhoo; Judy Wawira Gichoya; Leo Anthony Celi; Miguel Ángel Armengol de la Hoz
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2022-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.