Luis Filipe Nakayama1, Ashley Kras2, Lucas Zago Ribeiro3, Fernando Korn Malerbi3, Luis Salles Mendonça3,4, Leo Anthony Celi5,6, Caio Vinicius Saito Regatieri3, Nadia K Waheed4. 1. São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil nakayama.luis@gmail.com. 2. Retinal Imaging Lab, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 3. São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 4. Tufts Medical Center, New England Eye Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords:
artificial intelligence; public health informatics
Machine learning (ML) is a branch of artificial intelligence (AI) that performs a classification, prediction and/or optimisation task. Similar to brain neurons, neural networks output a label after multiple information layers connection, resembling human thinking.1AI is already influencing care in many areas, such as radiology, pathology, dermatology and ophthalmology. In ophthalmology, a variety of multimodal imaging examinations are fundamental in the screening, diagnosis and monitoring of diseases and provide data input for AI development.2 Some applications, such as the IDx Technologies (Coralville, USA) which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration 3 years ago, are already used in clinical practice as a screening tool.2 3 Surprisingly, algorithms can even predict gender, age and cardiovascular risk through retinal images.2 4 5 AI may reduce subjectivity and interobserver disagreement in clinical practice.1Especially in low-income (LIC) and low-to-medium-income countries (LMIC), preventable blindness causes such as diabetic retinopathy (DR) and age-related macular degeneration could be prevented with screening programmes, home monitoring systems or telemedicine. AI-based screening could systematise screening and improve eye care in remote areas.6ML requires high-quality, well-labelled, representative and large datasets, but at present, ophthalmological ML-ready datasets are only available in a few countries. One hundred seventy-two countries do not have representation in training and validation cohorts.7Although data from all world countries are a distant goal, equivalent representation of all continents, ethnicities and the maximum number of countries is desired to reduce ML bias. Demographic information and other social determinants of health are typically not contained in these datasets, making it challenging to interrogate algorithms for bias.7 8 High-quality data are also fundamental for environmental-specific algorithm validation, which is essential before AI implementation.Available automated DR algorithm performance varies considerably in performance in the real world due to limited training data, including heterogeneity in disease presentations and suboptimal image quality.9 In addition, diverse sociodemographic and ethnic representation are necessary if generalisability is a goal.8In LICs and LMICs, there is a growing gap between the ophthalmologist workforce and the population size. Two-thirds of ophthalmologists live in only 17 countries and in those countries, most practice in the urban centres.10 AI applications can expand access to eye care and may reduce preventable blindness, which is currently 80% of cases.In addition to diversifying datasets to build AI technology in healthcare, we must invest in building capacity for health informatics and data science across countries. International collaboration between research groups should be incentivised to narrow disparities in AI research in order to reduce world blindness.
Authors: Ryan Poplin; Avinash V Varadarajan; Katy Blumer; Yun Liu; Michael V McConnell; Greg S Corrado; Lily Peng; Dale R Webster Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Saad M Khan; Xiaoxuan Liu; Siddharth Nath; Edward Korot; Livia Faes; Siegfried K Wagner; Pearse A Keane; Neil J Sebire; Matthew J Burton; Alastair K Denniston Journal: Lancet Digit Health Date: 2020-10-01
Authors: Aaron Y Lee; Ryan T Yanagihara; Cecilia S Lee; Marian Blazes; Hoon C Jung; Yewlin E Chee; Michael D Gencarella; Harry Gee; April Y Maa; Glenn C Cockerham; Mary Lynch; Edward J Boyko Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Serge Resnikoff; Van Charles Lansingh; Lindsey Washburn; William Felch; Tina-Marie Gauthier; Hugh R Taylor; Kristen Eckert; David Parke; Peter Wiedemann Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Yuchen Xie; Dinesh V Gunasekeran; Konstantinos Balaskas; Pearse A Keane; Dawn A Sim; Lucas M Bachmann; Carl Macrae; Daniel S W Ting Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 3.283