Literature DB >> 33735069

A global review of publicly available datasets for ophthalmological imaging: barriers to access, usability, and generalisability.

Saad M Khan1, Xiaoxuan Liu2, Siddharth Nath3, Edward Korot4, Livia Faes5, Siegfried K Wagner6, Pearse A Keane6, Neil J Sebire7, Matthew J Burton8, Alastair K Denniston9.   

Abstract

Health data that are publicly available are valuable resources for digital health research. Several public datasets containing ophthalmological imaging have been frequently used in machine learning research; however, the total number of datasets containing ophthalmological health information and their respective content is unclear. This Review aimed to identify all publicly available ophthalmological imaging datasets, detail their accessibility, describe which diseases and populations are represented, and report on the completeness of the associated metadata. With the use of MEDLINE, Google's search engine, and Google Dataset Search, we identified 94 open access datasets containing 507 724 images and 125 videos from 122 364 patients. Most datasets originated from Asia, North America, and Europe. Disease populations were unevenly represented, with glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration disproportionately overrepresented in comparison with other eye diseases. The reporting of basic demographic characteristics such as age, sex, and ethnicity was poor, even at the aggregate level. This Review provides greater visibility for ophthalmological datasets that are publicly available as powerful resources for research. Our paper also exposes an increasing divide in the representation of different population and disease groups in health data repositories. The improved reporting of metadata would enable researchers to access the most appropriate datasets for their needs and maximise the potential of such resources.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33735069     DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30240-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Digit Health        ISSN: 2589-7500


  28 in total

1.  Automated classification of otitis media with OCT: augmenting pediatric image datasets with gold-standard animal model data.

Authors:  Guillermo L Monroy; Jungeun Won; Jindou Shi; Malcolm C Hill; Ryan G Porter; Michael A Novak; Wenzhou Hong; Pawjai Khampang; Joseph E Kerschner; Darold R Spillman; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  DeepLensNet: Deep Learning Automated Diagnosis and Quantitative Classification of Cataract Type and Severity.

Authors:  Tiarnan D L Keenan; Qingyu Chen; Elvira Agrón; Yih-Chung Tham; Jocelyn Hui Lin Goh; Xiaofeng Lei; Yi Pin Ng; Yong Liu; Xinxing Xu; Ching-Yu Cheng; Mukharram M Bikbov; Jost B Jonas; Sanjeeb Bhandari; Geoffrey K Broadhead; Marcus H Colyer; Jonathan Corsini; Chantal Cousineau-Krieger; William Gensheimer; David Grasic; Tania Lamba; M Teresa Magone; Michele Maiberger; Arnold Oshinsky; Boonkit Purt; Soo Y Shin; Alisa T Thavikulwat; Zhiyong Lu; Emily Y Chew
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 14.277

3.  Artificial intelligence-based strategies to identify patient populations and advance analysis in age-related macular degeneration clinical trials.

Authors:  Antonio Yaghy; Aaron Y Lee; Pearse A Keane; Tiarnan D L Keenan; Luisa S M Mendonca; Cecilia S Lee; Anne Marie Cairns; Joseph Carroll; Hao Chen; Julie Clark; Catherine A Cukras; Luis de Sisternes; Amitha Domalpally; Mary K Durbin; Kerry E Goetz; Felix Grassmann; Jonathan L Haines; Naoto Honda; Zhihong Jewel Hu; Christopher Mody; Luz D Orozco; Cynthia Owsley; Stephen Poor; Charles Reisman; Ramiro Ribeiro; Srinivas R Sadda; Sobha Sivaprasad; Giovanni Staurenghi; Daniel Sw Ting; Santa J Tumminia; Luca Zalunardo; Nadia K Waheed
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.770

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence in OCT angiography.

Authors:  Tristan T Hormel; Thomas S Hwang; Steven T Bailey; David J Wilson; David Huang; Yali Jia
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Generalisability through local validation: overcoming barriers due to data disparity in healthcare.

Authors:  William Greig Mitchell; Edward Christopher Dee; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Glaucoma and Machine Learning: A Call for Increased Diversity in Data.

Authors:  Sayuri Sekimitsu; Nazlee Zebardast
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2021-04-17

7.  Diabetic retinopathy classification for supervised machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Luis Filipe Nakayama; Lucas Zago Ribeiro; Mariana Batista Gonçalves; Daniel A Ferraz; Helen Nazareth Veloso Dos Santos; Fernando Korn Malerbi; Paulo Henrique Morales; Mauricio Maia; Caio Vinicius Saito Regatieri; Rubens Belfort Mattos
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2022-01-03

Review 8.  Literature Review on Artificial Intelligence Methods for Glaucoma Screening, Segmentation, and Classification.

Authors:  José Camara; Alexandre Neto; Ivan Miguel Pires; María Vanessa Villasana; Eftim Zdravevski; António Cunha
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-01-20

9.  The Trials and Tribulations of Assembling Large Medical Imaging Datasets for Machine Learning Applications.

Authors:  Kirti Magudia; Christopher P Bridge; Katherine P Andriole; Michael H Rosenthal
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.903

Review 10.  Application of generative adversarial networks (GAN) for ophthalmology image domains: a survey.

Authors:  Aram You; Jin Kuk Kim; Ik Hee Ryu; Tae Keun Yoo
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.