| Literature DB >> 35392919 |
Xinyu Guo1, Yuzhu Sha1, Weibing Lv1, Xiaoning Pu1, Xiu Liu2, Yuzhu Luo1, Jiang Hu1, Jiqing Wang1, Shaobin Li1, Zhidong Zhao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The gut microbiota play an important role in maintaining host metabolism, the immune system and health, while sex, genotype, diet and health have specific effects on the composition of the gut microbiota. Therefore, to explore the sex differences in the structure and function of rumen microbiota in Tibetan goats, herein we analyzed sex differences in rumen fermentation parameters, rumen microbiota and the expression of genes related to VFA transport in Tibetan goats.Entities:
Keywords: Gene expression; Ruminal microbiota; Sex differences; Tibetan goat; VFAs
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35392919 PMCID: PMC8991483 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-022-01783-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Rumen fermentation parameters of Tibetan goat of different sex
| Item | TGM | TGFm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration(mmol/L) | |||
| Acetic acid | 38.05 ± 1.30 | 22.97 ± 0.23 | < 0.01 |
| Propionic acid | 10.39 ± 1.03 | 6.85 ± 1.97 | 0.02 |
| Isobutyric acid | 1.05 ± 0.13 | 0.92 ± 0.12 | 0.19 |
| Butyric acid | 5.26 ± 0.87 | 4.50 ± 1.08 | 0.32 |
| Isovaleric acid | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 0.94 ± 0.11 | 0.82 |
| Valeric acid | 1.29 ± 0.50 | 1.22 ± 0.19 | 0.09 |
| A/P | 4.17 ± 1.90 | 3.56 ± 0.97 | 0.81 |
| Total VFAs | 52.03 ± 5.08 | 36.96 ± 2.25 | < 0.01 |
| NH3-N(mg/100 ml) | 39.97 ± 6.40 | 40.96 ± 2.31 | 0.78 |
| CL(μg/min/ml) | 157.19 | 154.56 | 0.14 |
A/P indicates acetic acid/propionic acid
Fig. 1Expression of VFAs transport-related gene. * For P < 0.05 and ** for P < 0.01
Fig. 2A OTU-Venn diagram analysis of TGFm and TGM. B Dilution curve analysis
Alpha diversity
| Index_type | TGFm | TGM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon | 7.47 | 7.44 | 0.87 |
| Simpson | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.33 |
| ACE | 848.31 | 851.82 | 0.88 |
| Chao1 | 868.23 | 891.64 | 0.38 |
Fig. 3A Relative abundance of phylum horizontal species. B Relative abundance of genus horizontal species
Fig. 4LDA value distribution histogram. LDA value > 4, the length of the bar chart represents the influence of different species
Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis
| Class 1 | Class 2 | TGFm | TGM | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional prediction of KEGG gene family | ||||
| Metabolism | Carbohydrate metabolism | 9.40 | 9.40 | 0.97 |
| Metabolism | Amino acid metabolism | 6.75 | 6.72 | 0.45 |
| Metabolism | Energy metabolism | 4.09 | 4.23 | 0.15 |
| Functional prediction of COG gene family | ||||
| Information storage and processing | Replication, recombination and repair | 5.75 | 5.64 | 0.03 |
| Information storage and processing | RNA processing and modification | 0.0040 | 0.0016 | 0.02 |
Fig. 5Determination of rumen microbiota density of Tibetan goats of different sexes. Bf indicates Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Fs indicates Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ram indicates Ruminobacter amylophilus, Ra indicates Ruminococcus albus, Rf indicates Ruminococcus flavanum, MB indicates Methanogenic bacteria. For different sexes, the same bacterial species marked with * indicates a significant difference between sexes (P < 0.05). In the same sex, different bacterial species marked with the same lowercase letters indicate a nonsignificant difference (P > 0.05)
Fig. 6Correlation heat map (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001). Acetic indicates acetic acid, butry indicates butyric acid, propi indicates propionic acid, valer indicates valeric acid
Fig. 7Model of mechanisms for generation and absorption of VFAs in Tibetan goats. Red letters indicate a significant upregulation in TGFm and blue letters indicate a significant upregulation in TGM. Black letters indicate that there is no significant difference between TGFm and TGM
Summary nutrient determination results of plateau forage (%)
| CP | EE | DM | Ash | NDF | ADF | Ca | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.64 | 4.07 | 5.39 | 6.95 | 54.95 | 32.15 | 0.84 | 1.14 |
Primer sequences of microbiota
| Gene | Primer(5′–3′) | Length | Annealing temperature (℃) | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterium | F:CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG | 181 bp | 60 | * |
| R:TTACCGCGGCTGCTGG | ||||
| Rf | F:TATCTTAGTGGCGGACGGGT | 157 bp | 60 | MT356193.1 |
| R:TCTAATCAGACGCGAGCCCA | ||||
| Fs | F:GATGAGCTTGCGTCCGATT | 110 bp | 60 | EU606019.1 |
| R:ATTCCCTACTGCTGCCTCC | ||||
| Ra | F:GGGCTTAACCCCTGAACTGC | 114 bp | 60 | X85098.1 |
| R:TCGCCACTGATGTTCCTCCT | ||||
| Ram | F:GGGGACAACACCTGGAAACG | 124 bp | 60 | Y15992.1 |
| R:CTTGGTAGGCCGTTACCCCA | ||||
| Bf | F:CCTGACTAAGAAGCACCGGC | 107 bp | 60 | U41167.1 |
| R:GTAAAACCGCCTACGCTCCC | ||||
| MB | F:TCTGTACGGGTTGTGAGAGCA | 106 bp | 60 | KP752401.1 |
| R:CGCGATTTCTCACATTGCGG |
Primer sequences of fatty acid-related genes
| Gene | Primer (5′–3′) | Length | Annealing temperature (°C) | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F:AGCCTTCCTTCCTGGGCATGGA | 113 bp | 60 | NM_001009784.3 | |
| R:GGACAGCACCGTGTTGGCGTAGA | ||||
| F:TGTGGCGGCTTCCAGAATTT | 167 bp | 60 | NM_001280717.1 | |
| R:CACAGGCTTGTTTGGGAGCA | ||||
| F:GGACTGTGTCATCTGGCAGC | 134 bp | 60 | XM_004002335.4 | |
| R:TGGGGTCCAACAAGGTCCAT | ||||
| F:AAGATCCCTGAGAACGCCGA | 152 bp | 60 | XM_027969012.1 | |
| R:AGCAGAAAGAGGAAGCGCAC | ||||
| F:TTCTTTGTCGTGGGGATCGG | 180 bp | 60 | XM_027967037.1 | |
| R:CGTGATTGCCATGATGCCTG | ||||
| F:ACGGCTCAGCCTTAGTAAACTTC | 144 bp | 60 | NC_0402252.1 | |
| R:AATGGAGTTGTGCGAGTTGGT | ||||
| F:GCTTCTTCGTGGTGTCCCTG | 174 bp | 60 | XM_004005085.4 | |
| R:CCATGATGCCTGACAGGTGG |