Literature DB >> 35392732

The effectiveness of enterprise stent use on the treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis disease.

Oguz Ari1, Omer F Nas2, Mehmet F Inecikli2, Bahattin Hakyemez2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical outcome of Enterprise stent in patients with severe and symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Twenty-five patients who underwent Enterprise stenting between January 2012 and March 2019 were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were previous intracranial stenting and inadequate follow-up. Technical success rates of the procedures were recorded. Clinical outcome was evaluated with pre- and post-treatment modified Rankin Scale scores. The patients were monitored for 18 months clinically and for 14.3 months radiologically.
RESULTS: The mean age of the 15 males and 10 females was 61.6 ± 8.19. Of these 25 patients, 6 (24%) were in the anterior system and 19 (76%) were in posterior system. The mean degree of pre-treatment stenosis was 86.4% ± 7 with the mean lesion length of 12.5 ± 7.5 mm. The residual stenosis rate was 23.8% ± 8.81. Technical success rate was 100%. There were two major complications within the first 30 days (8%). Late major complications (after 30 days) occurred in one case (4%). Stent restenosis was detected in two patients (8%). No intracranial bleeding or mortality was observed.
CONCLUSION: In this single-center study, we achieved high technical success and tolerable complication rates. Enterprise stent may be a good treatment alternative for severe intracranial stenosis especially in patients resistant to medical treatment when correct patient selection is made. However, further randomized controlled studies, including more cases should be carried out.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endovascular treatment; enterprise stent; intracranial atherosclerosis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35392732      PMCID: PMC9513921          DOI: 10.1177/19714009221083143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiol J        ISSN: 1971-4009


  30 in total

1.  A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  O B Samuels; G J Joseph; M J Lynn; H A Smith; M I Chimowitz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  A comparison of functional and physical properties of self-expanding intracranial stents [Neuroform3, Wingspan, Solitaire, Leo+, Enterprise].

Authors:  O Krischek; E Miloslavski; S Fischer; S Shrivastava; H Henkes
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2011-04-19

3.  WEAVE Trial: Final Results in 152 On-Label Patients.

Authors:  Michael J Alexander; Alois Zauner; John C Chaloupka; Blaise Baxter; Richard C Callison; Rishi Gupta; Shlee S Song; Wengui Yu
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Physical factors in the pathogenesis of cerebral atherosclerosis.

Authors:  J A Resch; R B Loewenson; A B Baker
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1970 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Wingspan experience in the treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease after antithrombotic failure.

Authors:  Edgar A Samaniego; Francesca Tari-Capone; Italo Linfante; Christine F Silva; Gabriela Spilberg; Matthew Gounis; Ajay K Wakhloo; Guilherme Dabus
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.836

6.  Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Colin P Derdeyn; Tanya N Turan; David Fiorella; Bethany F Lane; L Scott Janis; Helmi L Lutsep; Stanley L Barnwell; Michael F Waters; Brian L Hoh; J Maurice Hourihane; Elad I Levy; Andrei V Alexandrov; Mark R Harrigan; David Chiu; Richard P Klucznik; Joni M Clark; Cameron G McDougall; Mark D Johnson; G Lee Pride; Michel T Torbey; Osama O Zaidat; Zoran Rumboldt; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Detailed analysis of periprocedural strokes in patients undergoing intracranial stenting in Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS).

Authors:  David Fiorella; Colin P Derdeyn; Michael J Lynn; Stanley L Barnwell; Brian L Hoh; Elad I Levy; Mark R Harrigan; Richard P Klucznik; Cameron G McDougall; G Lee Pride; Osama O Zaidat; Helmi L Lutsep; Michael F Waters; J Maurice Hourihane; Andrei V Alexandrov; David Chiu; Joni M Clark; Mark D Johnson; Michel T Torbey; Zoran Rumboldt; Harry J Cloft; Tanya N Turan; Bethany F Lane; L Scott Janis; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease with a balloon-expandable paclitaxel eluting stent: procedural safety, efficacy and mid-term patency.

Authors:  Z Vajda; M Aguilar; T Göhringer; D Horváth-Rizea; H Bäzner; H Henkes
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.649

9.  Angioplasty and stenting for intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  Takashi Izumi; Hirotoshi Imamura; Nobuyuki Sakai; Shigeru Miyachi
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Long-term Outcomes of Drug-eluting Stents in Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis.

Authors:  Soonchan Park; Dong-Geun Lee; Won-Jung Chung; Deok Hee Lee; Dae Chul Suh
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.