| Literature DB >> 35392469 |
Jingfeng Mu1,2, Haoxi Zhong1,2, Meizhou Liu1,2, Mingjie Jiang1,2, Xinyi Shuai1,2, Yanjie Chen1,2, Wen Long1,2, Shaochong Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate myopia development among primary and secondary school students during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: coronavirus; epidemic; home confinement; myopia; spherical equivalent refraction
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35392469 PMCID: PMC8980682 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.859285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
The prevalence of myopia among primary and secondary school students in Shenzhen, China according to their demographic characteristics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Areas within the former Shenzhen SEZ | 455,218 | 0.470 | 495,047 | 0.505 | 1,162.8 | <0.001 | 0.035 |
| Nanshan District | 159,244 | 0.442 | 167,226 | 0.479 | 449.5 | <0.001 | 0.037 |
| Yantian District | 23,526 | 0.534 | 27,171 | 0.562 | 40.0 | <0.001 | 0.028 |
| Luohu District | 128,710 | 0.473 | 131,875 | 0.502 | 219.3 | <0.001 | 0.029 |
| Futian District | 143,738 | 0.488 | 168,775 | 0.523 | 380.4 | <0.001 | 0.035 |
| Areas outside the former Shenzhen SEZ | 1,017,739 | 0.437 | 1,078,777 | 0.473 | 2,736.5 | <0.001 | 0.036 |
| Dapeng New District | 13,838 | 0.461 | 16,552 | 0.537 | 174.1 | <0.001 | 0.076 |
| Longgang District | 358,456 | 0.443 | 370,568 | 0.467 | 423.2 | <0.001 | 0.024 |
| Pingshan District | 53,259 | 0.433 | 58,312 | 0.441 | 7.2 | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Bao'an District | 350,526 | 0.431 | 364,840 | 0.475 | 1,396.6 | <0.001 | 0.044 |
| Longhua District | 170,031 | 0.407 | 183,930 | 0.468 | 1,335.2 | <0.001 | 0.061 |
| Guangming District | 71,629 | 0.503 | 84,575 | 0.513 | 15.5 | <0.001 | 0.010 |
|
| |||||||
| Grade 1 | 197,708 | 0.138 | 191,089 | 0.138 | 0.0 | 0.999 | 0.000 |
| Grade 2 | 194,618 | 0.188 | 199,144 | 0.222 | 697.5 | <0.001 | 0.034 |
| Grade 3 | 173,369 | 0.287 | 193,208 | 0.324 | 588.6 | <0.001 | 0.037 |
| Grade 4 | 162,827 | 0.405 | 170,953 | 0.444 | 519.2 | <0.001 | 0.039 |
| Grade 5 | 156,464 | 0.519 | 161,082 | 0.556 | 437.1 | <0.001 | 0.037 |
| Grade 6 | 147,307 | 0.622 | 152,327 | 0.644 | 156.1 | <0.001 | 0.022 |
| Grade 7 | 113,963 | 0.687 | 133,986 | 0.712 | 183.5 | <0.001 | 0.025 |
| Grade 8 | 105,439 | 0.745 | 115,474 | 0.771 | 203.4 | <0.001 | 0.026 |
| Grade 9 | 88,408 | 0.784 | 99,468 | 0.808 | 166.6 | <0.001 | 0.024 |
| Grade 10 | 55,263 | 0.828 | 66,201 | 0.840 | 31.4 | <0.001 | 0.012 |
| Grade 11 | 48,675 | 0.837 | 58,153 | 0.850 | 34.1 | <0.001 | 0.013 |
| Grade 12 | 28,916 | 0.868 | 32,739 | 0.866 | 0.5 | 0.459 | −0.002 |
|
| |||||||
| Boys | 807,664 | 0.440 | 859,931 | 0.476 | 2,174.0 | <0.001 | 0.036 |
| Girls | 665,293 | 0.504 | 713,893 | 0.540 | 1,788.9 | <0.001 | 0.036 |
Figure 1The spatial distribution map of the prevalence of myopia in elementary and middle school students in Shenzhen, China.
Figure 2The prevalence of myopia in primary and secondary school students according to grade.
The prevalence of myopia of primary and secondary school students in Shenzhen, China according to school grade.
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Grade 1 | 0.862 | 0.127 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.862 | 0.130 | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Grade 2 | 0.812 | 0.172 | 0.014 | 0.002 | 0.778 | 0.204 | 0.016 | 0.002 |
| Grade 3 | 0.713 | 0.250 | 0.034 | 0.003 | 0.676 | 0.285 | 0.036 | 0.003 |
| Grade 4 | 0.595 | 0.335 | 0.065 | 0.005 | 0.556 | 0.365 | 0.073 | 0.005 |
| Grade 5 | 0.481 | 0.395 | 0.114 | 0.010 | 0.444 | 0.421 | 0.124 | 0.011 |
| Grade 6 | 0.378 | 0.424 | 0.177 | 0.021 | 0.356 | 0.438 | 0.184 | 0.022 |
| Grade 7 | 0.313 | 0.421 | 0.230 | 0.036 | 0.288 | 0.431 | 0.244 | 0.037 |
| Grade 8 | 0.255 | 0.403 | 0.287 | 0.055 | 0.229 | 0.414 | 0.297 | 0.060 |
| Grade 9 | 0.216 | 0.376 | 0.326 | 0.082 | 0.192 | 0.383 | 0.339 | 0.086 |
| Grade 10 | 0.172 | 0.341 | 0.373 | 0.113 | 0.160 | 0.348 | 0.374 | 0.118 |
| Grade 11 | 0.163 | 0.326 | 0.379 | 0.132 | 0.150 | 0.327 | 0.385 | 0.137 |
| Grade 12 | 0.132 | 0.306 | 0.401 | 0.160 | 0.134 | 0.310 | 0.395 | 0.161 |
|
| 221,163.2 | 222,365.3 | ||||||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
The data were tested by chi-square test for trend.
Figure 3The distribution curves of spherical equivalent refraction among elementary and middle school students in 2019 and 2020.
Figure 4The distribution curves of spherical equivalent refraction of each eye among elementary and middle school students in 2019 and 2020.
Figure 5The distribution curves of spherical equivalent refraction among elementary and middle school students in 2019 and 2020 according to sex.
The quartiles of spherical equivalent refraction in the right eyes of primary and secondary school students.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 |
| −1.880 | −2.250 | 0.060 | <0.001 |
|
| −0.625 | −0.750 | |||
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| 2020 |
| −2.000 | −2.375 | 0.061 | <0.001 |
|
| −0.625 | −0.875 | |||
|
| 0.000 | −0.125 |
The difference of distribution of spherical equivalent refraction between boys and girls were checked by non-parametric test.