Literature DB >> 35391772

Automatic Localization and Brand Detection of Cervical Spine Hardware on Radiographs Using Weakly Supervised Machine Learning.

Raman Dutt1, Dylan Mendonca1, Huai Ming Phen1, Samuel Broida1, Marzyeh Ghassemi1, Judy Gichoya1, Imon Banerjee1, Tim Yoon1, Hari Trivedi1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To develop an end-to-end pipeline to localize and identify cervical spine hardware brands on routine cervical spine radiographs. Materials and
Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, patients who received cervical spine implants between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Information on the implant model was retrieved from the surgical notes. The dataset was filtered for implants present in at least three patients, which yielded five anterior and five posterior hardware models for classification. Images for training were manually annotated with bounding boxes for anterior and posterior hardware. An object detection model was trained and implemented to localize hardware on the remaining images. An image classification model was then trained to differentiate between five anterior and five posterior hardware models. Model performance was evaluated on a holdout test set with 1000 iterations of bootstrapping.
Results: A total of 984 patients (mean age, 62 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 525 women) were included for model training, validation, and testing. The hardware localization model achieved an intersection over union of 86.8% and an F1 score of 94.9%. For brand classification, an F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity of 98.7% ± 0.5, 98.7% ± 0.5, and 99.2% ± 0.3, respectively, were attained for anterior hardware, with values of 93.5% ± 2.0, 92.6% ± 2.0, and 96.1% ± 2.0, respectively, attained for posterior hardware.
Conclusion: The developed pipeline was able to accurately localize and classify brands of hardware implants using a weakly supervised learning framework.Keywords: Spine, Convolutional Neural Network, Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms, Prostheses, Semisupervised Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022See also commentary by Huisman and Lessmann in this issue. 2022 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convolutional Neural Network; Deep Learning Algorithms; Machine Learning Algorithms; Prostheses; Semisupervised Learning; Spine

Year:  2022        PMID: 35391772      PMCID: PMC8980883          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  20 in total

1.  Comparing the performance of a deep convolutional neural network with orthopedic surgeons on the identification of total hip prosthesis design from plain radiographs.

Authors:  Alireza Borjali; Antonia F Chen; Hany S Bedair; Christopher M Melnic; Orhun K Muratoglu; Mohammad A Morid; Kartik M Varadarajan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Outcome in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review.

Authors:  P Sampath; M Bendebba; J D Davis; T Ducker
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy. A prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review.

Authors:  P Sampath; M Bendebba; J D Davis; T B Ducker
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The duration of symptoms and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy.

Authors:  Sigita Burneikiene; E Lee Nelson; Alexander Mason; Sharad Rajpal; Alan T Villavicencio
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA: patient characteristics and complications.

Authors:  S S Rajaee; L E A Kanim; H W Bae
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning.

Authors:  Paul H Yi; Jinchi Wei; Tae Kyung Kim; Haris I Sair; Ferdinand K Hui; Gregory D Hager; Jan Fritz; Julius K Oni
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Incidence and clinical outcomes of patients requiring anterior versus posterior repeat cervical fusion.

Authors:  Mohamad Bydon; Risheng Xu; Rafael De la Garza-Ramos; Mohamed Macki; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-04-16

8.  Automated medical diagnosis of COVID-19 through EfficientNet convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Gonçalo Marques; Deevyankar Agarwal; Isabel de la Torre Díez
Journal:  Appl Soft Comput       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Perioperative Outcomes in 17,947 Patients Undergoing 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus 1-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy for Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Conditions: A Propensity Score Matched National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.

Authors:  Anoop R Galivanche; Raj Gala; Preetpaul S Bagi; Arianne J Boylan; Christopher M Dussik; Pedro D Coutinho; Jonathan N Grauer; Arya G Varthi
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-12-31

10.  Skin lesion classification using ensembles of multi-resolution EfficientNets with meta data.

Authors:  Nils Gessert; Maximilian Nielsen; Mohsin Shaikh; René Werner; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2020-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.