Literature DB >> 24891583

National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA: patient characteristics and complications.

S S Rajaee1, L E A Kanim2, H W Bae2.   

Abstract

Using the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified national trends in revision spinal fusion along with a comprehensive comparison of comorbidities, inpatient complications and surgical factors of revision spinal fusion compared to primary spinal fusion. In 2009, there were 410 158 primary spinal fusion discharges and 22 128 revision spinal fusion discharges. Between 2002 and 2009, primary fusion increased at a higher rate compared with revision fusion (56.4% vs 51.0%; p < 0.001). In 2009, the mean length of stay and hospital charges were higher for revision fusion discharges than for primary fusion discharges (4.2 days vs 3.8 days, p < 0.001; USD $91 909 vs. $87 161, p < 0.001). In 2009, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) was used more in revision fusion than in primary fusion (39.6% vs 27.6%, p < 0.001), whereas interbody devices were used less in revision fusion (41.8% vs 56.6%, p < 0.001). In the multivariable logistic regression model for all spinal fusions, depression (odds ratio (OR) 1.53, p < 0.001), psychotic disorders (OR 1.49, p < 0.001), deficiency anaemias (OR 1.35, p < 0.001) and smoking (OR 1.10, p = 0.006) had a greater chance of occurrence in revision spinal fusion discharges than in primary fusion discharges, adjusting for other variables. In terms of complications, after adjusting for all significant comorbidities, this study found that dural tears (OR 1.41; p < 0.001) and surgical site infections (OR 3.40; p < 0.001) had a greater chance of occurrence in revision spinal fusion discharges than in primary fusion discharges (p < 0.001). A p-value < 0.01 was considered significant in all final analyses. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMP; Bone graft; Bone morphogenetic protein; Cervical fusion; Interbody device; Lumbar fusion; Revision spine fusion; Spinal fusion; Spinal fusion rates

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24891583     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.31149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  28 in total

1.  Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) L5-S1 with overpowering of posterior lumbosacral instrumentation and fusion mass: a reliable solution in revision spine surgery.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Andrea Zanirato; Francesco Langella; Andrea Redaelli; Carlotta Martini; Matteo Formica; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery: clinical results and complications.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Andrea Zanirato; Luca Cavagnaro; Marco Basso; Stefano Divano; Lamberto Felli; Carlo Formica
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Association between insurance status and patient safety in the lumbar spine fusion population.

Authors:  Joseph E Tanenbaum; Vincent J Alentado; Jacob A Miller; Daniel Lubelski; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Automatic Localization and Brand Detection of Cervical Spine Hardware on Radiographs Using Weakly Supervised Machine Learning.

Authors:  Raman Dutt; Dylan Mendonca; Huai Ming Phen; Samuel Broida; Marzyeh Ghassemi; Judy Gichoya; Imon Banerjee; Tim Yoon; Hari Trivedi
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-01-19

Review 5.  Patient-Related Risk Factors for the Development of Lumbar Spine Adjacent Segment Pathology.

Authors:  Eduardo Moreira Pinto; Artur Teixeria; Richado Frada; Filipa Oliveira; Pedro Atilano; Tânia Veigas; António Miranda
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-06-24

6.  The association of inflammatory bowel disease and immediate postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Joseph E Tanenbaum; Stephanie T Kha; Edward C Benzel; Michael P Steinmetz; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  In vivo performance of an acellular disc-like angle ply structure (DAPS) for total disc replacement in a small animal model.

Authors:  John T Martin; Dong Hwa Kim; Andrew H Milby; Christian G Pfeifer; Lachlan J Smith; Dawn M Elliott; Harvey E Smith; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Endplate Deformation Due to Open and Strutted Intervertebral Devices.

Authors:  Antonio Valdevit; Anna Kedzierska; Michelle B Gallagher; Jennifer M Schneider; Peter F Ullrich
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12-31

Review 9.  Surgical Strategies for the Treatment of Lumbar Pseudarthrosis in Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Literature Review and Case Study.

Authors:  Peter B Derman; Kern Singh
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-10-30

10.  Reoperations after fusion surgeries for degenerative spinal diseases depending on cervical and lumbar regions: a national database study.

Authors:  Moon Soo Park; Young-Su Ju; Seong-Hwan Moon; Young-Woo Kim; Jong Ho Jung; Jung Hyun Oh; Chi Heon Kim; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.