A Sorriento1,2, A Cafarelli1,2, P Spinnato3, A Russo4, G Lisignoli5, F Rabusseau6, P Cabras6, E Dumont6, L Ricotti1,2. 1. BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna 56127 Pisa Italy. 2. Department of Excellence in Robotics and AIScuola Superiore Sant'Anna 56127 Pisa Italy. 3. Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli 40136 Bologna Italy. 4. Clinica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli 40136 Bologna Italy. 5. SC Laboratorio di Immunoreumatologia e Rigenerazione TissutaleIRCSS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli 40136 Bologna Italy. 6. Image Guided Therapy (IGT) 33600 Pessac France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A repeatable and reliable follow-up of knee injuries would be desirable to prevent delayed diagnosis and to monitor the efficacy of the applied treatment over time. Ultrasound (US) techniques are an attractive option to this purpose, since they are safe, low-cost and non-invasive. However, its use in the clinical practice is limited by the high dependency on the operator's experience. Hence, the objective of this study is to provide a standardization of the US image acquisition process for knee osteoarthritis (OA) allowing an extended clinical use of US technologies in this domain. METHODS: Clinical specifications were provided by expert musculoskeletal radiologists thus identifying the subject poses and the US probe positions needed to evaluate the cartilage structure, signs of synovitis and joint effusion. Such considerations were used to derive the technical requirements needed for the development of a wearable brace equipped with specific openings to guide the correct placement of the probe. The feasibility of the developed wearable brace was tested on three healthy volunteers, which were asked to acquire informative US images, similar to the reference images performed by the musculoskeletal radiologist. RESULTS: Thanks to the knee brace, the untrained subjects were able to self-acquire informative B-mode images comparable to the corresponding images acquired by an expert clinician. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: The use of a knee brace intended for knee OA US diagnosis demonstrated the possibility to standardize the acquisition protocol and make its application achievable also for untrained subjects, representing a key step toward tele-ultrasonography.
OBJECTIVE: A repeatable and reliable follow-up of knee injuries would be desirable to prevent delayed diagnosis and to monitor the efficacy of the applied treatment over time. Ultrasound (US) techniques are an attractive option to this purpose, since they are safe, low-cost and non-invasive. However, its use in the clinical practice is limited by the high dependency on the operator's experience. Hence, the objective of this study is to provide a standardization of the US image acquisition process for knee osteoarthritis (OA) allowing an extended clinical use of US technologies in this domain. METHODS: Clinical specifications were provided by expert musculoskeletal radiologists thus identifying the subject poses and the US probe positions needed to evaluate the cartilage structure, signs of synovitis and joint effusion. Such considerations were used to derive the technical requirements needed for the development of a wearable brace equipped with specific openings to guide the correct placement of the probe. The feasibility of the developed wearable brace was tested on three healthy volunteers, which were asked to acquire informative US images, similar to the reference images performed by the musculoskeletal radiologist. RESULTS: Thanks to the knee brace, the untrained subjects were able to self-acquire informative B-mode images comparable to the corresponding images acquired by an expert clinician. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: The use of a knee brace intended for knee OA US diagnosis demonstrated the possibility to standardize the acquisition protocol and make its application achievable also for untrained subjects, representing a key step toward tele-ultrasonography.
Authors: Michael R Burcher; J Alison Noble; Lianghao Han; Mark Gooding Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: I Möller; D Bong; E Naredo; E Filippucci; I Carrasco; C Moragues; A Iagnocco Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: S Saarakkala; P Waris; V Waris; I Tarkiainen; E Karvanen; J Aarnio; J M Koski Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Linping Pian; Lawrence M Gillman; Paul B McBeth; Zhengwen Xiao; Chad G Ball; Michael Blaivas; Douglas R Hamilton; Andrew W Kirkpatrick Journal: Emerg Med Int Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 1.112
Authors: Jana Podlipská; Ali Guermazi; Petri Lehenkari; Jaakko Niinimäki; Frank W Roemer; Jari P Arokoski; Päivi Kaukinen; Esa Liukkonen; Eveliina Lammentausta; Miika T Nieminen; Osmo Tervonen; Juhani M Koski; Simo Saarakkala Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 4.379