| Literature DB >> 35390502 |
Xuefei Yu1, Catherine Arden1, Rolando Berlinguer-Palmini2, Chun Chen3, Carla Bradshaw3, Anna Lm Smith3, Julia Whitehall3, Michael White1, Scott Anderson1, Nicole Kattner1, James Shaw1, Doug Turnbull3, Laura C Greaves4, Mark Walker5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There is strong evidence that mitochondrial DNA mutations and mitochondrial dysfunction play a role in diabetes pathogenesis. The homozygous knock-in mtDNA mutator mouse is a model of premature aging due to the accumulation of mitochondrial DNA mutations. We used this mouse model to investigate the relationship between mitochondrial subunit expression and pancreatic islet cell composition.Entities:
Keywords: Mitochondria; Pancreatic islets; mtDNA; mtDNA mutator mice
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35390502 PMCID: PMC9046450 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2022.101489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Metab ISSN: 2212-8778 Impact factor: 8.568
Figure 1Decreased complex I expression is present in . (A): Representative immunofluorescent panel showing labelling of mitochondrial proteins in pancreatic islets from 12 week to 44 week mice. Scale bar, 100 μm. The dashed white line marks the islet perimeter. (B–E): Quantitative analysis of levels of TOMM20 (mitochondrial mass) (B), NDUFB8 (Complex I) (C) MTCO1 (Complex IV) (D), and insulin (E), in islets from 12 week PolgA and PolgA+/+ mice. Data are presented as Z-scores relative to the PolgA mice, n = 4 mice per group. (F–I): Quantitative analysis of levels of TOMM20 (F), NDUFB8 (G) MTCO1 (H), and insulin (I), in islets from 44 week PolgA and PolgA+/+ mice. Data are presented as Z-scores relative to the PolgA mice, n = 5 mice per group. For panels B–I each point represents an individual islet (n = 50 per mouse). Data are presented as mean ± 95% CI. Unpaired t-test. ∗P < 0.05. ∗∗∗P < 0.001. ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
Figure 2Islets from 44 week (A): Representative immunofluorescent panel showing labelling of nuclei (DAPI), α-cells (Glucagon) and β-cells (insulin) in islets of 44 week PolgA and PolgA mice. Scale bar, 100 μm. (B–G): Quantification of the islet size (B), total cell number (C), α-cell percentage (D), β-cell percentage (E), absolute α-cell number (F), and absolute β-cell number (G) in 44 week PolgA+/+ (n = 4) and PolgA (n = 5) mice. Each point represents one islet (n = 25 for each mouse). Data are presented as mean ± 95% CI. Unpaired t-test. ∗P < 0.05. ∗∗∗P < 0.001. Microscope settings were individually adjusted according to each islet.
Figure 3Complex I expression is lower in α-cells compared with β-cells in islets from 44 week . A–C: Quantification of levels of TOMM20 (A), NDUFB8 (B) and MTCO1 (C) in α-cells and β-cells in islets from 44 week PolgA+/+ (n = 5) and PolgA mice (n = 5). Data are presented as Z-scores relative to the PolgA β-cells. Each point represents an individual islet (n = 50 for each mouse). Data are presented as mean ± 95% CI. Unpaired t-test. ∗∗P < 0.01. ∗∗∗P < 0.001. ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
Figure 4Islets from 44 week (A): Composite quadruple immunofluorescence panel showing labelling of; nuclei (DAPI, blue); proliferating cells (Ki67, white (highlighted by yellow arrows)); α-cells (Glucagon, red); and β-cells (Insulin, green) in pancreatic islets. (Top panel) PolgA mice; (Bottom panel) PolgA mice. Scale bar, 100 μm. (B–D): Quantification of Ki67 positive labelling in PolgA and PolgA+/+ mice. (B) Mean percentage of islets per mouse with ≥1 Ki67(+) cells. (C) Mean percentage of islets per mouse with ≥1 Ki67(+) α-cells. (D) Mean percentage of islets per mouse with ≥1 Ki67(+) β-cells. PolgA+/+ mice (n = 4); PolgA mice (n = 4). Each dot represents the mean percentage per mouse (40 islets were quantified per mouse). Data are presented as mean ± 95%CI. Unpaired t-test. ∗P < 0.05. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)