| Literature DB >> 35388314 |
Aizhi Li1, Qunhui He1, Rulin Li2, Yu Chen1, Weiwei Xu1.
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery has the advantages of less trauma and quick recovery, and it is more and more favored by surgeons and patients in clinical practice. However, the impact of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on the body during laparoscopic surgery has attracted the attention of many scholars. Pneumoperitoneum can cause increased cerebral blood flow and increased intracranial pressure, cerebral metabolic rate is highly correlated with blood carbon dioxide partial pressure, and cerebral metabolism without cardiopulmonary bypass is linearly correlated with the depth of anesthesia. Electroencephalographic (EEG) bispectral index (BIS) is a signal analysis method, which can directly measure the effect of drugs on the cerebral cortex and reflect the depth of anesthesia. Based on this, this study takes smart medical treatment as the background and uses the improved BP neural network as a tool to explore the effect of carbon dioxide on EEG bispectral index under intravenous target-controlled anesthesia. The main purpose is to observe the correlation between arterial blood carbon dioxide partial pressure and EEG bispectral index under propofol target-controlled anesthesia during retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. The experimental results show that the model proposed in this study can efficiently and accurately obtain the size of the influencing factors, which provides a clinical basis for the anesthesia management and anesthesia depth regulation of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35388314 PMCID: PMC8977325 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4696128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Schematic diagram of EEG signal and bispectral index.
Figure 2Representation of basic EEG monitoring [19].
Figure 3Grey wolf algorithm flow chart.
Figure 4Improved grey wolf algorithm to optimize BP neural network structure diagram [29].
Comparison of general conditions and indexes of three groups of patients.
| Group | Age | Body mass index | Hierarchical structure |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | 49 ± 9 | 23 ± 3 | 9/11 |
| D1 | 52 ± 7 | 23 ± 4 | 12/8 |
| D2 | 50 ± 6 | 22 ± 3 | 10/10 |
Comparison of BIS values and OAA scores among the three groups.
| OAA score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| C | 97 ± 1 | 96 ± 3 | 82 ± 4 | 65 ± 3 | 59 ± 4 | 46 ± 5 |
| D1 | 96 ± 1 | 93 ± 3 | 80 ± 4 | 59 ± 6 | 54 ± 4 | 42 ± 3 |
| D2 | 97 ± 1 | 91 ± 3 | 73 ± 4 | 53 ± 3 | 48 ± 4 | 39 ± 3 |
Comparison of BIS values and OAA scores among the three groups.
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 1.11 ± 0.38 | 1.52 ± 0.37 | 1.70 ± 0.25 | 1.88 ± 0.06 |
| D1 | 0.82 ± 0.26 | 1.14 ± 0.19 | 1.33 ± 0.11 | 1.62 ± 0.08 |
| D2 | 0.25 ± 0.11 | 0.45 ± 0.15 | 0.66 ± 0.07 | 0.73 ± 0.03 |
Figure 5Propofol effect chamber concentration corresponding to different OAA scores in group A.
Figure 6Comparison of adverse events of respiration and circulation among the three groups.