| Literature DB >> 35387617 |
Jian Wu1,2,3, Xuetong Cheng1,2,3, Bo Kong1,2,3, Qing Zhou1,2,3, Yaru Sang1,2,3, Pingdong Zhang4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autopolyploids, especially artificial lines, provide model systems for understanding the mechanisms of gene dosage effects on trait variation owing to their relatively uniform genetic background. Here, a protocol for in vitro octaploid induction of Populus hopeiensis from leaf blades with colchicine treatment was established through investigation of the effects of different pre-culture durations, colchicine concentrations, and exposure times.Entities:
Keywords: Colchicine; Octaploid; Phenotypic variation; Populus hopeiensis; Stomata
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35387617 PMCID: PMC8985302 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03571-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Effect of pre-culture duration, colchicine concentration, and exposure time on leaf blades survival, shoot regeneration and octaploid induction of P. hopeiensis
| Treatment | Pre-culture | Colchicine | Exposure | Survival | Shoot regen- | No. of shoots | No. of | Octaploid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 50 | 2 | 76.67 ± 11.55 | 66.67 ± 5.77 | 150 | 0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 2 | 7 | 100 | 3 | 43.33 ± 15.28 | 43.33 ± 15.28 | 82 | 0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 3 | 7 | 150 | 4 | 30.00 ± 10.00 | 26.67 ± 5.77 | 54 | 1 | 1.59 ± 2.75 |
| 4 | 9 | 50 | 3 | 76.67 ± 15.28 | 66.67 ± 11.55 | 178 | 1 | 0.69 ± 1.20 |
| 5 | 9 | 100 | 4 | 46.67 ± 11.55 | 40.00 ± 10.00 | 93 | 8 | 8.61 ± 0.68 |
| 6 | 9 | 150 | 2 | 50.00 ± 10.00 | 46.67 ± 5.77 | 125 | 4 | 3.32 ± 1.81 |
| 7 | 11 | 50 | 4 | 63.33 ± 15.28 | 53.33 ± 5.77 | 138 | 0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 8 | 11 | 100 | 2 | 86.67 ± 5.77 | 76.67 ± 5.77 | 190 | 0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 9 | 11 | 150 | 3 | 56.67 ± 11.55 | 56.67 ± 11.55 | 86 | 0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 总计 | - | - | - | - | - | 1096 | 14 | - |
a Values represent the mean ± SE of three replicates
b Values represent the sum of three replicates
Fig. 1The regeneration of plants from leaf blades of P. hopeiensis. A Adventitious shoots regenerated from leaf blades after culture for 30 days (control). B Adventitious shoots regenerated from colchicine-treated leaf blades after culture for 30 days. C Vitrification of regenerated shoots from colchicine-treated leaf blades after culture for 30 days. D Healthy shoots successfully regenerated from colchicine-treated leaf blades after culture for 85 days. E Vitrification of regenerated shoots from colchicine-treated leaf blades after culture for 85 days. F Healthy regenerated plants successfully rooted
Multiple comparisons of the survival rate, shoot regeneration rate, and octaploid induction rate of different treatments
| Treatment | Levels | Survival | Shoot regeneration | Octaploid induction rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-culture duration (d) | 7 | 50.00 ± 23.45b | 45.56 ± 19.44b | 0.53 ± 1.59b |
| 9 | 57.78 ± 17.87ab | 51.11 ± 14.53b | 4.21 ± 3.67a | |
| 11 | 68.89 ± 16.92a | 62.22 ± 13.02a | 0.00 ± 0.00b | |
| Colchicine concentration (μM) | 50 | 72.22 ± 13.94a | 71.11 ± 18.33a | 0.23 ± 0.69b |
| 100 | 58.89 ± 23.15a | 58.89 ± 19.00ab | 2.87 ± 4.32a | |
| 150 | 45.56 ± 15.09b | 46.67 ± 18.03b | 1.64 ± 2.18ab | |
| Exposure time (d) | 2 | 62.22 ± 9.72a | 63.33 ± 14.14a | 1.11 ± 1.89b |
| 3 | 53.33 ± 20.00a | 55.56 ± 15.09a | 0.23 ± 0.69b | |
| 4 | 43.33 ± 15.00b | 40.00 ± 13.23b | 3.40 ± 4.21a |
Values represent the mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level by LSD tests
Fig. 2Determination of the ploidy levels in the regenerated P. hopeiensis plants. A Flow cytometry histogram of tetraploids. B Flow cytometry histogram of octaploids. C Somatic chromosome number in tetraploids (2n = 4x = 76). D Somatic chromosome number in octaploids (2n = 8x = 152)
Effect of ploidy level on stomatal characteristics of P. hopeiensis
| Tetraploids | 19.21 ± 0.12b | 8.54 ± 0.24b | 114.36 ± 12.16a |
| Octaploids | 35.01 ± 0.89a | 14.14 ± 0.54a | 56.87 ± 1.85b |
Data are mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability based on a two-sample t-test
Fig. 3Stomatal characteristics: Stomata of the leaf blade in tetraploid (A) and octaploid (B) plants of P. hopeiensis
Fig. 4Morphological traits: Leaf blades of diploid (A), tetraploid (B), and octaploid (C) plants; Sterile-rooted plantlets of diploid (D), tetraploid (E), and octaploid (F) plants of P. hopeiensis