| Literature DB >> 35387176 |
Sihan Lin1,2,3,4,5,6, Shi Yin1,2,3,4,5,6, Junfeng Shi1,2,3,4,5,6, Guangzheng Yang1,2,3,4,5,6, Xutao Wen7, Wenjie Zhang1,2,3,4,5,6, Mingliang Zhou1,2,3,4,5,6, Xinquan Jiang1,2,3,4,5,6.
Abstract
The clinical application of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) is limited by several factors, including ineffectiveness at low doses and severe adverse effects at high doses. To address these efficacy and safety limitations, we explored whether orchestration of energy metabolism and osteogenesis by magnesium ion (Mg2+) could reduce the dose and thereby improve the safety of BMP-2. Our results demonstrated that rapid metabolic activation triggered by BMP-2 was indispensable for subsequent osteogenesis. Moreover, inadequate metabolic stimulation was shown to be responsible for the ineffectiveness of low-dose BMP-2. Next, we identified that Mg2+, as an ''energy propellant", substantially increased cellular bioenergetic levels to support the osteogenesis via the Akt-glycolysis-Mrs2-mitochondrial axis, and consequently enhanced the osteoinductivity of BMP-2. Based on the mechanistic discovery, microgel composite hydrogels were fabricated as low-dose BMP-2/Mg2+ codelivery system through microfluidic and 3D printing technologies. An in vivo study further confirmed that rapid and robust bone regeneration was induced by the codelivery system. Collectively, these results suggest that this bioenergetic-driven, cost-effective, low-dose BMP-2-based strategy has substantial potential for bone repair.Entities:
Keywords: Biomaterials; Bone morphogenetic protein-2; Bone regeneration; Energy metabolism; Magnesium
Year: 2022 PMID: 35387176 PMCID: PMC8961427 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Schematic 1By orchestrating energy metabolism and osteogenesis, the bioenergetic-driven microgel composite hydrogel with Mg2+ as an energy propellant constructed herein was shown to improve low-dose BMP-2-driven bone regeneration. A) Using microfluidic devices and a water-in-oil strategy, methacrylated alginate (AlMA) microgels containing Mg2+ and BMP-2 were fabricated. The microgels were then embedded in GelMA for the subsequent 3D printing of a microgel composite hydrogel scaffold. B) "Propelled" by BMP-2 and Mg2+, the hydrogel functioned as a "cell shuttle" to drive the osteogenic differentiation of host stem cells. C) Mg2+, as the "energy propellant" of the "shuttle", significantly improved the osteoinductivity of BMP-2 by activating the main metabolic pathways to thereby fuel the bioenergetic demand related to osteogenesis.
Fig. 1In vitro evaluation of the effects of Mg2+ on BMP-2-mediated osteogenic differentiation. A) Alp staining of BMSCs treated with medium containing BMP-2 and gradient concentrations of Mg2+. B) qPCR analysis of osteogenic gene expression in BMSCs. (** and ## represent p < 0.01 in comparison with the Con and BMP-2 groups, respectively). C) Alp staining and ARS of BMSCs induced by different doses of BMP-2 with or without an Mg-enriched environment. D) Immunofluorescence staining of the Ocn protein in BMSCs. E) Semiquantitative analysis of Alp activity in BMSCs to verify the promotional effects of Mg2+ on BMP-2-based osteogenesis. (# and * represent p < 0.05 in comparison with the 50 and 20 ng mL−1 groups, respectively; ▲▲ represents p < 0.01 in comparison with the 20 ng mL−1 + Mg group).
Fig. 2The Mg-enriched environment resulted in robust ectopic bone formation in the low-dose BMP-2 groups in vivo and elevated expression levels of metabolic enzymes in the bone forming area. A) Schematic of the fabrication and subcutaneous injection of BMP-2/Mg2+ microbeads. B) The newly formed bone tissues were evaluated by micro-CT. C) The results of quantitative micro-CT analysis. (* represents p < 0.05 in comparison with the 50 μg mL−1 group, while ## represents p < 0.01 compared to 20 μg mL−1 + Mg group). D) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson trichrome, and immunofluorescence staining of the bone sections. The arrows in the images indicate the blood vessels. E) Colocalization analysis of Alp and key metabolic enzymes, Pfk and Idh, by immunofluorescence staining.
Fig. 3BMP-2 dose-dependently triggered rapid metabolic reprogramming, which played a decisive role in subsequent osteogenic differentiation. A) Seahorse assay of the OCRs and ECARs of BMSCs during BMP-2 induction. B) Charts depicting the primary parameters calculated from the above Seahorse assay curves. C) Heatmap showing the gene expression profile during BMP-2-mediated osteogenic differentiation. (* and ▲ represent p < 0.05 in comparison with the control and 3d groups, respectively; **, ## and ▲▲ represent p < 0.01 in comparison with the control, 1d and 3d groups, respectively). D, E) Inhibition of glycolysis and the TCA cycle by 2-DG and LW6 substantially impeded the expression of the Ocn protein and biomineralization. F) BMP-2 stimulated significant phosphorylation of the Akt protein. G, H) ATP synthesis was disrupted and Alp activity was reduced after the treatment of BMSCs with BMP-2 and the Akt inhibitor MK2206 (Akti) (** represents p < 0.01 in comparison with the BMP + Akti group). I) BMP-2 activated the Akt pathway in a dose-dependent manner. J) Evaluation of metabolic enzymes in BMSCs treated with different doses of BMP-2 by immunofluorescence staining. K) JC-1 analysis of the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) as an indicator of the cellular metabolic state. J-agg indicates cells with aggregated JC-1 (red fluorescence) and high ΔΨm, while j-free indicates cells with free JC-1 (green fluorescence) and low ΔΨm.
Fig. 4The promotional effects of Mg2+ on BMP-2 resulted from its stimulatory effects on cellular metabolism via the Akt-glycolysis-Mrs2-mitochondrial axis. A) Representative images of intracellular Mg2+ dynamics as detected by the Mag-green probe (red fluorescence represents mitochondria). B) Dynamic detection of Mg-green intensity in the mitochondrial region. C) Seahorse analysis of the OCRs and ECARs alterations in BMSCs induced by 20 ng mL−1 BMP-2 with or without Mg2+ for 7 days. BMSCs cultured in normal medium served as the control. D) Key parameters calculated from the above Seahorse assay curves. E) Heatmap depicting the expression profile of metabolic genes. F) Mg2+ addition stimulated the phosphorylation of Akt. G) Analysis of ΔΨm by flow cytometry. Cells in the upper left region exhibited a high ΔΨm, while cells in the lower right region had a low ΔΨm. H) Charts depicting the relative ΔΨm as determined by measuring the mean fluorescence intensity, the activities of metabolic enzymes, and ATP synthesis in the different groups (* and # represent p < 0.05, while ** and ## represent p < 0.01 in comparison with the control and 20 ng mL−1 groups, respectively). I) Changes in the Mg-green intensity in the mitochondria of normal and Mrs2 knockout BMSCs. J) Mrs2 knockout markedly suppressed ATP production in BMSCs treated with BMP-2 and Mg2+. (** represents p < 0.01). K) Alp staining of normal and mutant BMSCs. L) Mechanism of the stimulatory effects of Mg2+ on the efficacy of BMP-2.
Fig. 5Fabrication and characterization of the microgel composite hydrogel. A) Procedure used for the fabrication of the microgel composite hydrogel. B) Monodispersed AlMA microgels and particle size distribution. C) Swelling behaviors of hydrogels with different microgel contents. D) Compression tests of hydrogels with different microgel contents. E) Results of the strain-sweep tests. F) Degradation of GelMA hydrogels and composite hydrogels with a 1:10 AlMA/GelMA mass ratio. G, H) Release profile of BMP-2 and Mg2+ in AlMA microgels or composite hydrogels. I) The distribution of red fluorescence-labeled AlMA microgels in the hydrogels. J) Expression of Opn in BMSCs on hydrogels as detected by CLSM.
Fig. 6Evaluation of the efficacy of a Mg2+-based bioenergetic-driven low-dose BMP-2 delivery platform in a rat critical cranial defect model. A) Radiological images of the samples harvested at 4 weeks after implantation. B) Results of the quantitative analysis of bone regeneration. C) H&E and Masson trichrome staining of the decalcified sections. D) Double immunofluorescence staining analysis of the expression of Sp7 and Opn in the different groups. E) The Opn- and Sp7-positive areas were assessed by double immunofluorescence staining, and 4 random images from each group were selected for evaluation. (**, ## and ▲▲ represent p < 0.01 in comparison with the 20, 50 μg mL−1 and 20 μg mL−1 + Mg groups, respectively).