| Literature DB >> 35386593 |
Cuicui Wang1,2, Yun Li1, Xuan Luo1,2, Huijian Fu3, Ziqi Ye1, Guangwei Deng1,2.
Abstract
With the rapid development of the take-out industry, taste and hygiene ratings as social-based information have been frequently used by online food-ordering platforms to facilitate consumer purchases. The present study aims to uncover the effects of taste and hygiene ratings on online food-ordering decision by incorporating behavioral and neural approaches. The behavioral results showed that a high taste rating induced a higher ordering intention than a low taste rating, and that a high hygiene rating induced a higher ordering intention than a low hygiene rating. The effect of hygiene rating on ordering intention was moderated by taste rating. Hygiene rating had a greater impact on ordering intention when the taste rating was high (vs. low). In addition, inconsistency between taste and hygiene ratings increased the cognitive load and took more time for decision-making. The event-related potential (ERP) data revealed that consumers paid more attention to a high (vs. low) taste rating in the early cognitive process, which was reflected by a larger P2. Subsequently, a more negative N2 was elicited by conflicting ratings than consistent ratings when the taste rating was low. In the relatively late decision-making process, a larger P3 was evoked by consistent than conflicting ratings, suggesting that consumers had more confidence in their decisions for consistent ratings. These findings could help restaurants understand the roles of taste and hygiene rating cues in affecting consumer behavior and prompt those restaurants to adopt effective measures to increase online sales.Entities:
Keywords: cue diagnosticity theory; event-related potentials; food; hygiene rating; taste rating
Year: 2022 PMID: 35386593 PMCID: PMC8978544 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.844027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677