Literature DB >> 17935798

Predicting outcomes of decisions in the brain.

David Polezzi1, Lorella Lotto, Irene Daum, Giuseppe Sartori, Rino Rumiati.   

Abstract

When making decisions, the outcomes of different choices play an important role. Feedback is mainly processed in terms of gains and losses. It is as yet unclear whether this distinction holds for predictable as well as unpredictable outcomes. Using ERPs, the present study aimed to determine whether predictable and unpredictable outcomes are coded differently in the brain. Participants had to choose between one of two options: the certain option was always associated with a gain of 10 euro, while the uncertain option entailed a gain of 30 euro or a loss of 10 euro, with a probability of 50% each. Overall, subjects showed a clear preference for the certain option, a tendency which became more pronounced during the course of the experiment. An early ERP component, the P200, reflected the predictability of outcomes, which was critical for the subsequent decisions. The later feedback related negativity (FRN) reflected the known distinction between gains and losses, while the N500 again reflected differential processing of predictable and unpredictable outcomes. Neither FRN nor the N500 were significantly related to behaviour. Predictability appears to play a central role in outcome evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17935798     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  22 in total

1.  Anxiety and outcome evaluation: the good, the bad and the ambiguous.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Yue Ge; Yang Jiang; Yue-jia Luo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  A magnetoencephalography study of choice bias.

Authors:  William M Hedgcock; David A Crowe; Arthur C Leuthold; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Temporal dynamics of reward processing revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Nuria Doñamayor; Josep Marco-Pallarés; Marcus Heldmann; M Ariel Schoenfeld; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Coherence in general and personal semantic knowledge: functional differences of the posterior and centro-parietal N400 ERP component.

Authors:  Benjamin Schöne; Moritz Köster; Thomas Gruber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  An electrophysiological index of changes in risk decision-making strategies.

Authors:  Dandan Zhang; Ruolei Gu; Tingting Wu; Lucas S Broster; Yi Luo; Yang Jiang; Yue-jia Luo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Escalating risk and the moderating effect of resistance to peer influence on the P200 and feedback-related negativity.

Authors:  John Kiat; Elizabeth Straley; Jacob E Cheadle
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.235

7.  Neural correlates of feedback processing in decision-making under risk.

Authors:  Beate Schuermann; Tanja Endrass; Norbert Kathmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Different varieties of uncertainty in human decision-making.

Authors:  Amy R Bland; Alexandre Schaefer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Neural Correlates of Successful and Unsuccessful Strategical Mechanisms Involved in Uncertain Decision-Making.

Authors:  Julie Giustiniani; Damien Gabriel; Magali Nicolier; Julie Monnin; Emmanuel Haffen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Decision and dopaminergic system: an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Daniela Mapelli; Elisa Di Rosa; Matteo Cavalletti; Sami Schiff; Stefano Tamburin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.