Apelin-13 Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Responses and Acute Lung Injury by Regulating PFKFB3-Driven Glycolysis Induced by NOX4-Dependent ROS.

Purpose: Acute lung injury (ALI) is a life-threatening condition with limited therapeutic options. Macrophage inflammation plays a key role in the development of ALI. Abnormal glycolysis of macrophages contributes to the inflammatory response. However, the role of macrophage glycolysis in ALI still requires investigation. Apelin-13 has been shown to protect against ALI, whereas the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we explored the effect of apelin-13 on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation and ALI via regulation of glycolysis by modulating redox homeostasis in macrophages.
Methods: Serums from 34 patients with sepsis and 13 healthy volunteers were analyzed. In vivo, the protective effect of apelin-13 against LPS-induced ALI was evaluated using a mouse model of LPS-induced ALI. In vitro, mouse bone marrow macrophages (BMDMs) were pretreated with the antioxidant, NADPH oxidase (NOX) 4 (NOX4) small-interfering RNA (siRNA), the 6-phosphofructo-2 -kinase/fructose- 2,6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3) siRNA, or the PFKFB3 overexpression plasmid before exposure to LPS.
Results: Serum apelin-13 levels were significantly elevated in patients with sepsis and sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (P<0.0001). In vivo, apelin-13 suppressed LPS-induced ALI and inflammatory cytokine production (P<0.05). Furthermore, apelin-13 reduced hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, NOX4 protein levels, and glycolysis. In vitro, LPS stimulation elevated NOX4 protein levels and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (P<0.05). These changes resulted in the accumulation of glycolysis in BMDMs. Treatment with antioxidant or NOX4 siRNA inhibited LPS-induced glycolysis and inflammatory cytokine production (P<0.05). Moreover, in vitro experiments revealed that PFKFB3 regulates the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by modulating glycolysis. In contrast, the action of apelin-13 opposed the effects of LPS.
Conclusion: In conclusion, apelin-13 protects against LPS-induced inflammatory responses and ALI by regulating PFKFB3-driven glycolysis induced by NOX4-dependent ROS.

Introduction

Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are common life-threatening lung diseases, primarily associated with acute and severe inflammation of the lungs.1 Many immune cells are involved in pulmonary inflammatory dysfunction.2,3 Among the various immune cells, macrophages play a crucial role in the host inflammatory response.2,4 Therefore, inhibition of the inflammatory response of macrophages may be a promising approach for treating ALI.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is one of the most common microbial mediators in ALI.5 LPS is a major bioactive component of the cell wall of gram-negative bacteria and strongly stimulates the inflammatory response by recognizing the pattern recognition receptor toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4).6,7 LPS and other harmful stimuli have been associated with increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Oxidative stress is defined as an imbalance between ROS production and the ability of cells to detoxify or scavenge these molecules. As a signaling molecule, ROS production plays a relevant role in the inflammatory response.8 NADPH oxidase (NOX) 4 (NOX4) is a non-phagocytic isoform of NOX and an essential source of cellular hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and ROS.9 In recent years, the vital role of NOX4 in mediating macrophage function during inflammation has been emphasized. NOX4 knockdown protects against cecal ligation puncture-induced septic ALI10 and LPS-induced macrophage inflammation.11 However, the potential mechanism of NOX4 in the inflammatory phase of ALI remains to be explored.

Many studies have demonstrated that when exposed to different stimuli, the metabolic profile of activated macrophages can rapidly shift from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis (a phenomenon also known as the Warburg effect) to adopt an inflammatory state.12,13 As reported, enhanced glycolysis of macrophages leads to increased lactate production, which is thought to be associated with increased mortality in patients with sepsis.14 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/ fructose- 2.6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3) is one of the Critical drivers of glycolysis, which regulates glycolytic flux and produces fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (F2, 6BP), a potent allosteric activator of the glycolytic rate-limiting enzyme phosphofructokinase-1 (PFK1).15,16 Previous studies have shown that LPS stimulation promotes increased expression of PFKFB3 in macrophages, which contributes to increased production of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6.17 Various pathways regulating glycolysis have been identified, among which ROS represent one of the essential regulators.18,19 The appropriate ROS production within the macrophages to counteract pathogens or responses to cellular stress. The excessive ROS production influences the outcome of the inflammatory immune cell response, which in turn exacerbates abnormal metabolic events.18 Therefore, we hypothesized that LPS might activate ROS and subsequently activate glycolysis promoting the inflammatory phase of ALI.

The renin–angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in the development and pathogenesis of ALI.20–22 Apelin, an endogenous ligand for angiotensin type 1 receptor associated protein (APJ), is a group of small peptides.23 Previous studies have shown that the apelin /APJ system counteracts the effects of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-angiotensin (Ang)-II-angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) axis and is a positive regulator of angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) under many physiological and pathophysiological conditions.24–28 Recently, a study showed that rats with oleic acid-induced ARDS had higher lung tissue levels of apelin-13,29 and treatment with apelin-13 alleviated LPS-induced lung inflammation and injury.29–31 However, the exact molecular mechanism by which the apelin-13 protects against ALI is not fully understood. A study by Kong et al showed that apelin-13 enhanced AMPK phosphorylation to regulate mitochondrial function to improve the pulmonary endothelial barrier in ALI mice.30 Zhang et al reported that apelin-13 reduced IL-1β release, suppressed activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, and inhibited the NF-κB pathway in RAW264.7 cells.31 Nevertheless, the effect of apelin-13 on LPS-induced inflammation in primary macrophages remains unclear, and whether apelin-13 can be used to improve macrophage oxidative stress and thus glycolysis are still mostly unknown.

In this study, we explored the regulation of glycolysis through NOX4-dependent ROS in LPS-induced ALI and demonstrated that apelin- 13 attenuated macrophage inflammation and improved ALI by inhibiting the PFKFB3-driven glycolysis induced by NOX4-dependent ROS in vivo and in vitro.

Materials and Methods

Materials

LPS, Apelin-13, F13A (a selective APJ receptor antagonist), DPI (an NAPDH oxidase inhibitor, diphenylene iodonium), NAC (a superoxide inhibitor, N-Acetyl Cysteine) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Mouse tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and Apelin-13 enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were purchased from Cusabio (Houston, TX, USA). The reactive oxygen species assay kit (DCF-DA) was from Applygen (Beijing, China). The H2O2 assay kit was from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). NOX4- small-interfering RNA (siRNA) and PFKFB3 siRNA were provided by GenePharma (Shang hai, China). Mouse PFKFB3 (NM_001177756) overexpressed plasmid was purchased from MiaoLing Plasmid Sharing Platform (Hubei, China). Other reagents are described below.

Animals

All experimental procedures involving mice were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Southern Medical University and were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines. 8–10 weeks old male C57 mice (22–26g) were obtained from Southern Medical University Animal Center (Guangzhou, China) and housed in a standard environment with 12 h light, 12 h dark and free access to food and water.

Animal Treatments

A mouse model using LPS-induced ALI was used. Male C57 mice were randomly divided into three groups: the control group, the LPS group, and the LPS +Apelin group. Mice were treated once by intratracheal (i.t.) instillation of 5 mg/kg of LPS in saline (or with saline as a control). Mice in the LPS +Apelin group were injected with apelin (10 nmol/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.)) 1 h after installation of LPS and 3 h after the initial dose of apelin-13. After 6 hours of LPS instillation, the mice were killed and the tissue of lung was obtained for scheduled tests.

H&E Staining

Paraffin-embedded mouse lung sections were stained by hematoxylin (DH0001, Leagene) and eosin (DH0055, Leagene). Images were captured by microscopy.

Immunohistochemical Staining

Paraffin-embedded mouse lung sections were incubated with primary antibodies against PFKFB3 (A5593, Bimake) at 4 C overnight. Then, the sections were incubated with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (GK500710, Gene Tech) for 30 min followed by DAB solution for seconds. Next, the nuclei were stained with hematoxylin and the sections were sealed with neutral gum. Images were captured by microscopy.

Immunofluorescence Staining

Tissue samples were sectioned, deparaffinized, and processed for staining. The tissue was incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Then lung sections were stained with FITC and Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (A0562, A0521, beyotime) for an hour at room temperature, after which they were stained with DAPI (F6057, sigma). Images were captured with fluorescence microscopy (BX63, OLYMPUS). Primary antibodies here included anti-APJ (20341-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-F4/80 (MAB5580-SP, R&D Systems), anti-NOX4 (14347-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-PFKFB3 (A5593, Bimake).

Measurement of Lung Wet/Dry Weight Ratio

The lung wet/dry (W/D) weight ratio was calculated to assess the lung edema. Each lung was weighed before and after being dried in an oven at 80°C for at least 24 h until the weight was constant.

Analysis of BALF

The levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were measured using ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Lactate in BALF was measured with Lactate Assay Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The protein concentration in the BALF was assessed using the BCA protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories).

Cell Culture

Mouse macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 was obtained from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in DMEM (GIBCO) with 10% FBS (GIBCO) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Bone marrow-derived cell from C57BL/6 mice were cultured in DMEM media supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin and differentiated to bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) by recombinant murine granulocyte- macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (25 ng/mL; Miltenyi Biotech) for 7 days.

Measurement of Glucose Uptake, Lactate Production, LDH Activity and ATP Production

Glucose uptake assay kit was from Cayman Chemical Co (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Lactate production and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) enzymatic assay were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). The ATP content assay kit was from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). All experiments were performed at least three times and the data were normalized by the cell numbers or protein content.

Western Blot Analysis

Relative protein expression levels were measured by Western blot as described previously.32 Antibodies used here were as follows: hexokinase (HK) 2 (22029-1-AP, Proteintech), pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) (15822-1-AP, Proteintech), PFKFB3 (A5593, Bimake), Lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) (21799-1-AP, Proteintech), NOX4 (14347-1-AP, Proteintech), β-actin (20536-1-AP, Proteintech), APJ (20341-1-AP, Proteintech) and secondary antibodies (92632210, 92632211, Licor). Protein bands were visualized by the Odyssey System from LI-COR Biosciences.

qRT-PCR

RNA was extracted by TRIzol (9109, Takara) and cDNA was synthesized using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (RR036A, Takara). Quantitative PCR was performed using TB Green™ Premix Ex Taq™ (RR420B, Takara) with Light Cycler® 480 (Roche). The primer sequences are as follows: TNF-α: Forward: GACTACGTGC- TCCTCACCCA, Reverse: TCTTGACGGCAGAGAGGAGG; IL-1β: Forward: TCGCAGCAGCACATCAACAAGAG, Reverse: AGGTCCACGGGAAAGACACAGG; IL-6: Forward: CTCCCAACAGACCTGTCTATAC, Reverse: CCATTGCACAACTCTTTTCTCA; APJ: Forward: CCAGTCTGAATGCGACTACG, Reverse: CTCCCG- GTAGGTATAAGTGGC; ACE: Forward: ACCAGAAGCCAGACAACAACTCAC, Reverse: CTTCCACGAACCTGTCAGCCTTG; AT1R: Forward: CTTGCTGCCTCGTCTACCACATG, Reverse: GTGCTCCTGAGAGGGTCCGAAG; ACE2: Forward: CTCTGGGAATGAGGACACGG, Reverse: CTTG- GGTTGGGCACTGCTTA; MAS: Forward: ATCAGTGTGGAGAGGTGCCTATCG, Reverse: ACGAATGCTGACTGGTGCTTGG; β-actin: Forward: GGCTGTATTCCCCTCCATCG, Reverse: CCAGTTGGTAACAATGCCATGT. The relative fold change was calculated by the comparative CT method.

Sepsis Patients and the Assessment of Patient Serum

Serums were collected from 34 sepsis patients (including nine sepsis-associated ARDS patients) and 13 healthy volunteers. Sepsis was described as a life-threatening organ dysfunction induced by a dysregulated host response to infection (sepsis 3.0);33 characterized as a ≥2 points increase in total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score attributable to infection. The clinical definition of ARDS is based on clinical features and chest imaging according to the Berlin definition.34 The information about patients and healthy volunteers used as controls are listed in Table 1. Apelin-13 levels in the serum were determined using ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All participants provided informed consent to serum donation prior to participating in the study and all procedures were performed in accordance with the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki.

Table 1

Clinical Information for 13 Healthy Volunteers and 34 Sepsis Patients Enrolled in This Study

13 Healthy Volunteers
Age
Median (range)	40.5 (24–65) years
25–30 years	4 subjects (30.8%)
31–50 years	5 subjects (38.4%)
>50 years	4 subjects (30.8%)
Male	8 subjects (61.5%)
Female	5 subjects (38.5%)
34 Sepsis Patients
Age
Median (range)	52 (24–70) years
25–30 years	1 subject (3.0%)
31–50 years	13 subjects (38.2%)
>50 years	20 subjects (58.8%)
Male	22 subjects (64.7%)
Female	12 subjects (35.3%)
Clinical outcome
Survival	32 subjects (94.1%)
Death	2 subjects (5.9%)

Statistical Analysis

All the results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data analysis was performed by SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis of two groups. ANOVA analyses were utilized when more than two groups were assessed. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

Increased Serum Levels of Apelin-13 in Patients with Sepsis and Sepsis-Associated ARDS

A total of 47 participants with or without sepsis were studied. Serum samples were collected from 34 patients with sepsis (including nine patients with sepsis-associated ARDS) and 13 healthy volunteers were collected. Patients with sepsis and patients with sepsis-associated ARDS had significantly increased levels of apelin-13 compared with healthy controls (n=13) (Figure 1A, Table 1). Here we also showed that serum apelin-13 levels appear to be associated with the severity and lethality in patients with sepsis-associated ARDS, at least in some patients (Figure 1B), suggesting that the expression of apelin-13 may have a protective effect against sepsis-associated ARDS.

Figure 1

Serum apelin-13 levels increased in patients with sepsis and sepsis-associated ARDS. (A) Serum apelin-13 levels in healthy controls (n=13) and 34 patients with sepsis (n=34, including nine patients with sepsis-associated ARDS). Apelin-13 levels in serum were measured by ELISA. (B) Temporal changes of apelin-13 serum levels in three patients with sepsis-associated ARDS (patient 5, 6, and 7). Apelin-13 levels were measured by ELISA at the indicated time points after the visit for sepsis diagnosis. ****P<0.0001 versus healthy group.

Apelin-13 Attenuated Histological Damage and Lung Inflammation in Mice with LPS Induced Lung Injury

To demonstrate that increased apelin-13 expression after ALI may have a protective effect and explore its precise mechanism, we constructed an animal model of LPS-induced ALI (Figure 2A). Similar to our human data, serum apelin-13 levels were elevated in LPS-induced ALI mice (Figure 2B). H&E staining of lung tissues demonstrated that the main characteristics of ALI, including interstitial and alveolar infiltration of inflammatory cells and thickening of the alveolar septa, were evident in LPS-induced lungs, but were dramatically reduced after apelin-13 treatment (Figure 2C and D). Similarly, the total protein concentration in BALF and the lung W/D weight ratio were substantially increased in LPS group, which was attenuated by apelin-13 treatment (Figure 2E and F). Furthermore, the results of RT-qPCR and ELISA showed that, compared to the LPS group, apelin-13 significantly reduced the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, in lung tissue and BALF (Figure 2G and H). These findings suggest that apelin-13 can effectively inhibit systemic inflammation in LPS-induced lung injury mice.

Figure 2

Apelin-13 attenuated histological damage and lung inflammation in mice with LPS-induced lung injury. (A) The intervention dose regimen of apelin-13 in an experimental mouse model of acute lung injury. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with apelin-13 or vehicle 1 h after LPS instillation and 3 h after the initial dose of apelin-13. After 6 h of LPS instillation, the mice were killed and the tissue of lung was obtained for scheduled tests. (B) Expression of apelin-13 in the serum of the control group and the LPS treatment group. (C) Representative H&E-stained lung sections of different groups at 200x and 400 x original magnification. The alveolar walls were with intramural neutrophils (arrows). (D) Histopathological scores of different groups. (E) Total protein levels in BALF of each group. (F) The lung W/D weight ratio was assessed among experimental groups. (G) Levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in lung tissues were detected by real-time PCR. (H) Levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in BALF were detected by ELISA. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05 versus control group, #P<0.05 versus the LPS treatment group (n=6).

Apelin-13 Inhibited the Release of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in LPS-Treated Macrophages via the APJ Receptor

In in vivo studies, we found that apelin-13 significantly reduced lung inflammation. Macrophages, as one of the most important innate immune cells, play a crucial role in the highly inflammatory response to ALI. Therefore, we subsequently investigated the relationship between apelin-13 and macrophage inflammation. As showed in Figure 3A and B, compared with the control group, the expression of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β were obviously increased in RAW264.7 cells after LPS stimulation. Treatment with apelin-13 at concentrations of 0.1 to 1 μM gradually decreased the levels of those pro-inflammatory cytokines. To determine whether this effect was also present in primary cells, we treated BMDMs with apelin-13 and observed the same results (Figure 3A and B). Stimulating BMDMs with LPS for the indicated periods of time (0, 3, 6 h), we also found that treating cells with apelin-13 before LPS stimulation inhibited the release of inflammatory cytokines (Figure 3C). These results suggest that apelin-13 reduces the secretions of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in LPS-activated macrophages.

Figure 3

Apelin-13 inhibited the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in LPS-treated macrophages through the APJ receptor. (A) RAW264.7 cells and BMDMs were treated with 1ug/mL LPS and the indicated concentrations of apelin-13 for 6 h. The mRNA levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were measured by real-time PCR. (B) TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels in culture supernatants were measured by ELISA. (C) BMDMs were treated with LPS (1ug/mL) or apelin-13 (1 umol/L) at different times. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 concentrations were measured in culture supernatants. (D) BMDMs were pre-incubated with apelin-13 (1umol/L) for 1 h before being exposing to 1ug/mL LPS for 6 h. APJ mRNA levels were measured by real-time PCR. (E) Protein levels of APJ were measured by Western blot analysis. (F) BMDMs were treated with apelin-13 (1 umol/L) or F13A (1 umol/L) for 1h before being stimulated with LPS (1 ug/mL) for 6 h. The mRNA levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were determined by real-time PCR. (G) TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels in culture supernatants were measured by ELISA. (H) Colocalization of APJ and F4/80 in lung sections was examined by immunofluorescence. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05 versus control group, #P<0.05 versus the LPS treatment group, &P< 0.05 vs the LPS + Apelin (n=3).

The G protein-coupled receptor APJ is one of the essential receptors for apelin-13. To determine whether APJ is involved in the inhibitory effect of apelin-13 on inflammatory cytokines release, we examined the expression of APJ in BMDMs cultured under different conditions. As shown in Figure 3D, the level of APJ increased in the LPS group compared to the control group. In addition, there appeared to be a positive autoregulation, and apelin-13 pretreatment enhanced LPS-induced mRNA and protein expression of APJ receptor (Figure 3D and E). RT-qPCR and ELISA results showed that LPS promotes the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. Apelin-13 significantly inhibited these effects of LPS, and these inhibitory effects could be reversed by the APJ receptor antagonist F13A (Figure 3F and G). This result suggests that apelin-13 ameliorates LPS-induced inflammatory cytokines release mainly through the G protein-coupled receptor APJ. In vivo, immunofluorescence staining confirmed the colocalization of APJ and F4/80, a macrophage marker (Figure 3H). Therefore, apelin-13 inhibited the LPS-induced release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from macrophages through the APJ receptor.

Treatment of Apelin-13 Led to Down-Regulation of the ACE/AT1R Axis and Up-Regulation of ACE2 Expression in LPS-Treated Macrophages

Localized RAS is involved in the development of acute lung injury.20,21 Accumulating evidence shows that the apelin /APJ system interacts with the RAS.26,27 Therefore, we examined the expression of the RAS components in BMDMs cultured under different conditions. As shown in Figure 4A, LPS increased ACE and AT1R mRNA levels and decreased ACE2 mRNA levels. In contrast, apelin-13 decreased ACE and AT1R levels and increased ACE2 expression. Western blot analysis also showed the same trend (Figure 4B). MAS mRNA levels were reduced by LPS, while apelin-13 treatment had little effect on MAS expression levels (Figure 4A and B). These data indicate that apelin-13 can regulate RAS levels in BMDMs.

Figure 4

Treatment with apelin-13 led to down-regulation of the ACE/AT1R axis and up-regulation of ACE2 expression in LPS-treated macrophages. (A) BMDMs were treated with apelin-13 (1 umol/L) for 1 h before stimulation with LPS (1 ug/mL) for 6 h. The mRNA levels of ACE, AT1R, ACE2 and MAS were determined by real-time PCR. (B) Protein levels of ACE, AT1R, ACE2 and MAS were determined by Western blot analysis. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05 versus control group, #P<0.05 versus the LPS treatment group (n=3).

Apelin-13 Suppressed Pro-Inflammatory Responses by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress in LPS-Treated Macrophages

As shown in Figure 5A and B, LPS significantly increased the production of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β remarkably compared to the control group. Then we investigated the oxidation levels of BMDMs stimulated with LPS. As shown in Figure 5C, LPS enhanced the expression of NOX4 protein. Meanwhile, the concentration of H2O2 was increased after exposure to LPS (Figure 5G). Similarly, LPS stimulation resulted in noticeable increase in intercellular ROS production (Figure 5H and I). Apelin-13 obviously inhibited these increases, and these inhibitory effects could be reversed by the APJ receptor antagonist F13A. Meanwhile, pretreatment with NAPDH oxidase inhibitor DPI or ROS scavenger NAC inhibited the above effects of LPS. Analogously, the LPS-induced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β was suppressed by NOX4 siRNA (Figure 5D and E). The effect of NOX4 silencing was confirmed at the protein levels (Figure 5F). These data suggest that apelin-13 suppresses the LPS-induced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines by inhibiting oxidative stress.

Figure 5

Apelin-13 suppressed pro-inflammatory responses by inhibiting oxidative stress in LPS-treated macrophages. (A) BMDMs were treated with apelin-13 (1 umol/L), NAC (2 mmol/L), DPI (10 umol/L), or F13A (1 umol/L) for 1 h before stimulation with LPS (1 ug/mL) for 6 h. The mRNA levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were determined by real-time PCR. (B) TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels in culture supernatants were measured by ELISA. (C) Protein levels of NOX4 were measured by Western blot analysis. (D) BMDMs were transfected with NOX4 siRNA before stimulation with LPS (1 ug/mL) for 6 h. The mRNA levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were determined by real-time PCR. (E) Concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines were detected in culture supernatants. (F) Protein levels of NOX4 were measured by Western blot analysis. (G) H2O2 concentrations in BMDMs were measured. (H and I) Intracellular ROS was detected by the probe DCF-DA. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *P< 0.05 vs control group, #P< 0.05 vs the LPS group, &P< 0.05 vs the LPS + Apelin, $P< 0.05 vs NT siRNA group, ^P< 0.05 vs the LPS+NT siRNA (n=3).

Apelin-13 Attenuated the PFKFB3-Driven Glycolysis in LPS-Treated Macrophages

Recent studies have shown that increased aerobic glycolysis is essential for developing a pro-inflammatory phenotype in LPS-activated macrophages.35,36 We investigated whether apelin-13 inhibits inflammation by suppressing glycolysis in macrophages. BMDMs were stimulated with LPS for a specified duration (0, 3, or 6 h). We then evaluated glucose consumption, lactate production, LDH activity and ATP production in BMDMs. As shown in Figure 6A, LPS promoted significant increases in lactate levels, ATP production, glucose consumption and intracellular LDH activity in BMDMs, which are all indicators of enhanced glycolytic flux. Apelin-13 was shown to suppress LPS-induced glycolysis enhancement, and this effect was pronounced at 6h (Figure 6A). Meanwhile, extracellular acid ratio (ECAR) analysis showed that LPS treatment increased glycolysis and glycolytic activity in BMDMs, both of which were also reduced by apelin-13 (Figure 6B and C). Additionally, apelin-13 treatment increased Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) levels in BMDMs compared to the LPS group (Figure 6D and E). To elucidate the mechanism by which apelin-13 inhibits the enhanced glycolysis observed in LPS-stimulated BMDMs, we evaluated the expression of key glycolytic enzymes in these cells. Notably, PFKFB3 was significantly induced by LPS in BMDMs and the apelin-13 widely reduced its expression at the protein level (Figure 6F and G). Furthermore, the protein level of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α (HIF-α) in LPS-treated BMDMs was markedly increased compared to the control group, while apelin-13 inhibited the aforementioned effects of LPS (Figure 6H).

Figure 6

Apelin-13 attenuated PFKFB3-driven glycolysis in LPS-treated macrophages. (A) BMDMs were treated with LPS (1ug/mL) or apelin-13 (1 umol/L) at different times. Glucose consumption, lactate production, LDH activity, and ATP production were measured in different groups. (B) BMDMs were treated with apelin-13 (1 umol/L) for 1 h before stimulation with LPS (1 ug/mL) for 6 h. ECAR was measured using the Seahorse XF. (C) Glycolysis and glycolysis capacity were quantified and shown as histograms. (D) OCR was measured using the Seahorse XF. (E) Basal respiration and maximal respiration were quantified and shown as histograms. (F) Protein levels of HK2, PKM2, PFKFB3, and LDHA were analyzed by Western blot. (G) Quantification of HK2, PKM2, PFKFB3, and LDHA protein levels relative to β-actin is shown. (H) Protein level of HIF-α was analyzed by Western blot. (I) BMDMs were transfected with PFKFB3 siRNA before stimulation with LPS for 6 h. Protein level of PFKFB3 were measured by Western blot analysis. (J) The mRNA levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were determined by real-time PCR. (K) TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels in culture supernatants were measured by ELISA. (L) BMDMs were transfected with PFKFB3 plasmid. The protein level of PFKFB3 were measured by Western blot analysis. (M) The mRNA levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in different groups were detected by real-time PCR. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs control group, #P< 0.05 vs the LPS group, &P< 0.05 vs the LPS + Apelin, $P< 0.05 vs NT siRNA group, ^P < 0.05 vs the LPS+NT siRNA (n=3).

To further explore whether apelin-13 suppresses LPS-induced inflammatory responses by attenuating PFKFB3-driven glycolysis, we transfected BMDMs with PFKFB3 siRNA and PFKFB3 overexpression plasmid to test our hypothesis. Using PFKFB3 siRNA, we confirmed that pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β) release was reduced in response to PFKFB3 siRNA (Figure 6J and K). The effect of PFKFB3 silencing was confirmed at protein levels (Figure 6I). As shown in Figure 6M, the reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines expression in apelin-13 treated macrophages was reversed after PFKFB3 overexpression plasmid pretreatment. The effect of PFKFB3 overexpression was confirmed at the protein level (Figure 6L). Taken together, the above data demonstrate that apelin-13 can eliminate the PFKFB3-driven increase in glycolysis, which promotes the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from BMDMs.

Apelin-13 Suppressed LPS-Induced Pro-Inflammatory Responses by Inhibiting the NOX4/ROS/PFKFB3-Driven Glycolysis

As shown in Figure 7A, apelin-13 inhibited LPS-induced enhancement of the glycolytic protein PFKFB3 and this inhibitory effect was reversed by the APJ receptor antagonist F13A. Pretreatment with NOX4 siRNA neutralized LPS-induced PFKFB3 enhancement (Figure 7B). This finding suggests that NOX4-derived ROS may be necessary for PFKFB3-driven glycolysis activation. Next, we used glucose consumption, lactate production, LDH activity, ATP production and ECAR to evaluate the glycolytic flux. Figure 7C–H showed that, after apelin-13 added to BMDMs stimulated by LPS, the glucose consumption, lactate production, LDH activity, ATP production and ECAR was significantly lower than those of stimulated by LPS alone, indicating that apelin-13 partially ameliorated LPS-induced glycolysis. Furthermore, apelin-13 treatment increased OCR levels in BMDMs compared to the LPS group (Figure 7I and J). However, the protective effect of apelin-13 was neutralized by F13A. Additionally, LPS-induced glycolysis was attenuated by NAC or DPI (Figure 7C–H), suggesting that apelin-13 suppressed LPS-induced inflammatory responses by regulating the NOX4/ROS/PFKFB3-driven glycolysis.

Figure 7

Apelin-13 suppressed LPS-induced pro-inflammatory responses by regulating the NOX4/ROS/PFKFB3-driven glycolysis. (A) BMDMs were treated with apelin-13 (1 umol/L), NAC (2 mmol/L) or DPI (10 umol/L) for 1 h before stimulation with LPS (1 ug/mL) for 6 h. BMDMs were pretreated with F13A (1 umol/L) for 1 h before stimulation with apelin-13. Protein levels of PFKFB3 were analyzed by Western blot. (B) BMDMs were transfected with NOX4 siRNA before stimulation with LPS for 6 h. PFKFB3 were analyzed by Western blot. (C–F) Glucose consumption, lactate production, LDH activity, and ATP production were measured. (G) ECAR was measured using the Seahorse XF. (H) Glycolysis and glycolysis capacity were quantified and displayed as histograms. (I) OCR was measured using the Seahorse XF. (J) Basal respiration and maximal respiration were quantified and shown as histograms. *P< 0.05 vs control group, #P< 0.05 vs the LPS group, &P< 0.05 vs the LPS + Apelin, $P< 0.05 vs NT siRNA group, ^P< 0.05 vs the LPS+NT siRNA (n=3).

Apelin-13 Alleviated Oxidation Levels and Reduced PFKFB3-Driven Glycolysis in LPS-Induced Lung Injury Mice

To confirm the regulation of oxidative stress and PFKFB3-driven glycolysis by apelin-13 in vivo, we evaluated oxidative levels, lactate levels, and PFKFB3 expression in lung tissue of mice. The results showed that the concentration of H2O2 (Figure 8A) and the NOX4 protein expression (Figure 8B) were increased in the LPS group compared to the control group. Apelin-13 treatment could suppress the aforementioned effects of LPS. Immunofluorescence staining showed that the expression of NOX4 were widely decreased in the LPS+Apelin13 group when compared to the LPS group (Figure 8C). As shown in Figure 8D, BALF lactic acid levels increased significantly in LPS-treated mice, whereas they were decreased considerably after intervention with apelin-13. In addition, western blotting and immunohistochemical staining showed that apelin-13 inhibited the LPS-induced upregulation of PFKFB3 in the lungs of mice (Figure 8E and F). Meanwhile, immunofluorescence staining confirmed the colocalization of PFKFB3 and F4/80, a macrophage marker (Figure 8G). Collectively, these results suggest that apelin-13 attenuates oxidative levels and reduces PFKFB3-driven glycolysis in mice with LPS-induced lung injury.

Figure 8

Apelin-13 alleviated oxidation levels and reduced PFKFB3-driven glycolysis in mice with LPS-induced lung injury. (A) Mice were injected intraperitoneally with apelin-13 or vehicle after LPS instillation, and 6 h later, their lung were harvested. H2O2 concentrations in lung homogenates were tested. (B) NOX4 protein levels in the lungs were detected by Western blot. (C) Immunofluorescence images for NOX4 staining (red) in different groups of lung sections. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Lactate concentrations were detected in different groups of BALF. (E) PFKFB3 protein levels in lung homogenates were assessed by Western blot. (F) The expression of PFKFB3 was detected by immunohistochemistry. (G) Immunofluorescence was performed to examine the colocalization of PFKFB3 (red) and F4/80 (green) in lung sections. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 100 μm. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05 versus control group, #P<0.05 versus the LPS treatment group (n=6).

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated that apelin-13 alleviated the release of inflammatory cytokines from macrophages and improved ALI by regulating PFKFB3-driven glycolysis induced by NOX4-generated ROS (Figure 9). The principal findings included the following: (i) Serum apelin-13 levels were increased in patients with sepsis-associated ARDS; (ii) Apelin-13 upregulated ACE2 expression while downregulating the ACE/AT1R axis in LPS-treated BMDMs; (iii) Glycolysis is activated by LPS-induced NOX4-dependent ROS; (iiii) Apelin-13 attenuated macrophage inflammation and ameliorated ALI by regulating oxidative levels and PFKFB3-driven glycolysis in vivo and in vitro.

Figure 9

Schematic diagram of the major signaling pathways involved in apelin-13 attenuates inflammatory responses and acute lung injury. NOX4-generated ROS and the consequent PFKFB3-driven glycolysis mediated macrophage inflammation and ALI. Apelin-13 attenuates macrophage inflammation and improves ALI by downregulating the NOX4/ROS/PFKFB3-driven glycolysis.

This study focused on apelin peptides, which are highly abundant in lung tissue.25,37 Previous studies have shown that the apelin /APJ system interacts with the RAS and that the apelin/APJ signaling pathway counteracts the ACE-Ang II-AT1R axis,24,26,38 and that apelin is a positive regulator of ACE2 in failing hearts.25 Furthermore, the RAS is involved in the development and pathogenesis of ALI.21,22,39 Activation of the RAS is involved in the process of respiratory syncytial virus-induced ALI and that was partially reversed by pharmacological inhibition of AT1R.39 Angiotensin-(1–7), produced by Ang II with ACE2, is protective in murine models of ventilator or acid aspiration-induced ALI.22 It has been reported that apelin-13 could protect against experimental ALI,29–31 and decrease IL-1β release in RAW 264.7 cells.31 However, the mechanisms by which apelin-13 protects against ALI are still not fully understood. Consistent with these findings, our results illustrated that apelin-13 could effectively protect mice from LPS-induced lung inflammation and injury. We hypothesized that the protective role of apelin-13 in inflammation and ALI could be associated with the decrease of ACE and AT1R levels and the increase of ACE2 levels. According to our data, LPS treatment increased the expression of the ACE/AT1R axis, both ACE and AT1R, and decreased the expression of ACE2 in BMDMs. Apelin-13 obviously constrained the aforementioned effects of LPS. These results suggested that apelin-13 increases ACE2 expression and decreases the activation of the ACE/AT1R axis induced by LPS in BMDMs.

Oxidative stress, an imbalance between excessive ROS production and the antioxidant capacity of cells, is a key factor that contributes to severe pulmonary inflammation in ALI/ARDS.8,40 The NOX enzyme family is a major source of ROS in macrophages.41,42 NOX4 is a non-phagocytic homolog of NOX, and NOX4 activation has been linked to pro-inflammatory responses induced by LPS.43,44 However, the underlying mechanisms of NOX4 in macrophages during the inflammatory phase of ALI remain unclear. Here, our results showed that oxidants, such as NOX4 and H2O2, were increased in LPS-induced ALI mice and in LPS-stimulated BMDMs, accompanied by the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Inhibition of NOX4-dependent ROS with DPI, NAC, or NOX4 siRNA abolished LPS-induced inflammatory effects, indicating that NOX4-driven ROS are important in LPS-induced inflammatory responses in macrophages. Although NOX4-generated ROS played a role in developing the macrophage inflammatory response, the exact molecular mechanism still needs to be further studied.

Severe metabolic abnormalities are another characteristic of sepsis-associated ALI, in which aerobic glycolysis is enhanced.45–47 Many studies have emphasized the importance of glycolytic metabolism in the regulation of effector function.48 Glycolytic metabolism has been identified as a vital driver of macrophage pro-inflammatory immune responses.49–51 Therefore, controlling the glycolysis of macrophages may be a potential strategy for treating sepsis-related ALI. Several previous studies have shown that PFKFB3 plays a central regulatory role in cellular metabolism.52,53 Here, we demonstrate that lactate production and PFKFB3 expression were remarkably increased together with inflammatory response after LPS treatment both in vivo and in vitro. LPS-induced release of pro-inflammatory cytokines could be ameliorated by PFKFB3 siRNA. Moreover, apelin-13 inhibited PFKFB3-driven glycolysis and ameliorated LPS-induced pro-inflammatory response. We proposed that the protective effect of apelin-13 against inflammation may be related to the reduction of PFKFB3-driven glycolysis. Pretreatment with the PFKFB3 overexpression plasmid was found to reverse the effect of apelin-13 on LPS-induced inflammatory cytokine release. Paradoxically, it has been reported that PFKFB3-driven macrophage glycolytic metabolism is a crucial component of innate antiviral defense.54 The discrepancy may be a result of different severity of lung injury and inflammation. Appropriate inflammatory responses are critical for pathogen elimination, but excessive inflammation may result in organ damage and increased mortality. Although PFKFB3-driven glycolysis is an important metabolic driver of macrophage function, excessive macrophage activation due to enhanced glycolytic activity can cause organ damage and even death.55,56 Recent studies have shown that deficiency of myeloid PFKFB3 protects mice from LPS-induced endotoxemia and hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension.57,58 Regulating excessive immune cell activation through metabolic reprogramming is seen as a promising approach to treating a variety of inflammatory diseases.55,59 Further studies are necessary to clarify the potential protect effect of apelin-13 in different severity and phase of septic ARDS.

ROS is one of the effector molecules that activate cellular aerobic glycolysis.60,61 Increasing evidence indicates that NOX4 plays a critical role in regulating glycolysis that depends on ROS production.62,63 Our findings have shown that LPS could enhance the NOX4-derived ROS in vivo and in vitro. Thus, we hypothesized that LPS-induced ROS might be involved in the process of glycolysis. Pretreatment with DPI, NAC, and NOX4 siRNA dramatically reduced the expression of PFKFB3, highlighting the essential role of NOX4-dependent ROS in the progress of glycolysis. In addition, antioxidants effectively attenuated lactate levels, ATP production, glucose consumption and intracellular LDH activity, which are indicators of enhanced glycolytic flux. Therefore, we presume that apelin-13 alleviates ALI and ameliorates macrophage inflammation by inhibiting NOX4-derived ROS and subsequent glycolytic activation.

The results in this study are consistent with our assumption. In vivo, apelin-13 treatment significantly attenuated LPS-induced oxidative stress and counteracted abnormal glycolysis, leading to the alleviation of ALI. In vitro, apelin-13 inhibited PFKFB3-driven glycolysis by suppressing NOX4-generated ROS. Furthermore, the inhibitory effects of apelin-13 could be weakened by F13A, the APJ receptor antagonist, suggesting that apelin-13 counteracts the effects of LPS through the APJ receptor. Although we demonstrated an essential role for NOX4-dependent ROS in LPS-induced glycolysis, the underlying signaling mechanism has not yet been clarified. HIF-1α is an important transcription factor in glucose metabolism that upregulates a series of genes involved in glucose transport and glycolysis.64,65 Current studies indicated that ROS could regulate glycolysis through HIF-1.60,66,67 Our findings show that the protein level of HIF-α was elevated in the LPS group, apelin-13 inhibited the aforementioned effect of LPS. This finding provides some critical information for our further study.

There are several limitations to this study. One limitation of this study is that we did not use LC-MS to detect glucose metabolites and circulating intermediates. Another limitation is that, as a potential therapeutic target for ALI, the effects of apelin-13 have not been estimated in patients. Future studies will focus on the therapeutic impact of apelin-13 in patients with ALI.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that apelin-13 attenuates macrophage inflammation and improves ALI by regulating PFKFB3-driven glycolysis induced by NOX4-dependent ROS. Consequently, these results revealed a specific mechanism of apelin-13 attenuation of ALI, suggesting that apelin-13 may be a promising therapeutic agent for the prevention and treatment of ALI and macrophage inflammation.