Nise Ribeiro Marques1, Marina Hiromi Kuroda2,3, Vinicius Christianini Moreno2,3, Antonio Roberto Zámuner4, Fabio Augusto Barbieri3. 1. Center of Healthy Science, Universidade do Sagrado Coração, USC, Rua Irmã Arminda, 10-50, Bauru, SP, CEP: 17011-160, Brazil. nise.marques@unisagrado.edu.br. 2. Center of Healthy Science, Universidade do Sagrado Coração, USC, Rua Irmã Arminda, 10-50, Bauru, SP, CEP: 17011-160, Brazil. 3. Department of Physical Education, São Paulo State University, UNESP, Bauru, Brazil. 4. Laboratorio de Investigación Clínica en Kinesiología, Department of Kinesiology, Universidad Católica del Maule, UCM, Talca, Chile.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Automated mechanical peripheral stimulation (AMPS) is a rehabilitation technique suggested to correct gait abnormalities on Parkinson's disease. Although previous studies have suggested increments in functional performance and gait speed after AMPS intervention, little is known about its effect on gait biomechanics. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of an AMPS session on functional performance and gait biomechanics in subjects with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects aged 67±3 years old participated in this study. Kinematics and muscle activation were recorded during walking at a preferred gait speed before and after AMPS and sham interventions. Footswitches sensors were used to record the kinematic parameters. Electromyographic (EMG) signals of tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) were recorded. Timed up and go (TUG) test and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) were performed to assess functional performance. RESULTS: GL activation increased after AMPS intervention before and after heel strike (p = 0.04; p < 0.01) and before and after toe-off (p = 0.013; p = 0.038). Also, after AMPS intervention, TA activation increased after heel strike (p = 0.007); and after sham intervention, TA activation reduced before and after heel strike (p = 0.038; and p = 0.007) and before toe-off (p = 0.013). The time of TUG test was shorter after AMPS intervention (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: AMPS intervention changed the EMG activation of ankle muscles during walking and functional performance. However, AMPS intervention did not change gait kinematics.
BACKGROUND: Automated mechanical peripheral stimulation (AMPS) is a rehabilitation technique suggested to correct gait abnormalities on Parkinson's disease. Although previous studies have suggested increments in functional performance and gait speed after AMPS intervention, little is known about its effect on gait biomechanics. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of an AMPS session on functional performance and gait biomechanics in subjects with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects aged 67±3 years old participated in this study. Kinematics and muscle activation were recorded during walking at a preferred gait speed before and after AMPS and sham interventions. Footswitches sensors were used to record the kinematic parameters. Electromyographic (EMG) signals of tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) were recorded. Timed up and go (TUG) test and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) were performed to assess functional performance. RESULTS: GL activation increased after AMPS intervention before and after heel strike (p = 0.04; p < 0.01) and before and after toe-off (p = 0.013; p = 0.038). Also, after AMPS intervention, TA activation increased after heel strike (p = 0.007); and after sham intervention, TA activation reduced before and after heel strike (p = 0.038; and p = 0.007) and before toe-off (p = 0.013). The time of TUG test was shorter after AMPS intervention (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: AMPS intervention changed the EMG activation of ankle muscles during walking and functional performance. However, AMPS intervention did not change gait kinematics.
Authors: Emily E Borchers; Tara L McIsaac; Jennifer K Bazan-Wigle; Aaron J Elkins; Ralph C Bay; Becky G Farley Journal: Neurodegener Dis Manag Date: 2019-11-05
Authors: Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi; Maria Francesca de Pandis; Claudia Piervincenzi; Manuela Galli; Jean Marc Melgari; Gaetano Salomone; Patrizio Sale; Carlo Augusto Mallio; Filippo Carducci; Fabrizio Stocchi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240