Jacques Bouget1,2, Frédéric Balusson3, Sandrine Kerbrat3, Pierre-Marie Roy4,5, Damien Viglino6, Karine Lacut7, Laure Pavageau8, Emmanuel Oger3. 1. Université de Rennes, CHU Rennes, EA 7449 [Pharmacoepidemiology and Health Services Research] REPERES, 35043, Rennes, France. jacques.bouget@univ-rennes1.fr. 2. Emergency Department, Rennes University Hospital, 35033, Rennes, France. jacques.bouget@univ-rennes1.fr. 3. Université de Rennes, CHU Rennes, EA 7449 [Pharmacoepidemiology and Health Services Research] REPERES, 35043, Rennes, France. 4. Emergency Department, Institut MITOVASC, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Université d'Angers, 49033, Angers, France. 5. F-CRIN INNOVTE, Saint-Étienne, France. 6. Emergency Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, 38043, Grenoble, France. 7. Université de Bretagne Loire, Université de Brest, INSERM CIC 1412, CHRU de Brest, CIC 1412, 29200, Brest, France. 8. Emergency Department, University Hospital, 44093, Nantes, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Low-dose parenteral anticoagulation has demonstrated its efficacy for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in randomized trials. However, current practice is not widely documented. In ambulatory settings, we aimed to provide an overview of the clinical use of low-dose parenteral anticoagulation in France and to assess the incidence of major bleeding and death rates. METHODS: A population-based prospective cohort study using the French national health data system (SNIIRAM) identified 142,815 adults living in five well-defined geographical areas who had a course of low-dose parenteral anticoagulants (a total of 150,389 courses) in the period 2013-2015. The main outcome measures were the types of low-dose parenteral anticoagulant, the duration and the clinical context. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) were derived from Poisson models. RESULTS: Enoxaparin was the most frequently prescribed anticoagulant (58.9%) followed by tinzaparin (27.3%) and fondaparinux (10.9%). Patients receiving unfractionated heparin (N = 766, 0.53%) were older, more frequently had renal disease (48.75%) and had a higher modified HAS-B(L)ED score (≥ 3 in 61.6%) than patients receiving low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Surgical thrombo-prophylaxis was the most frequent indication (47.6%), followed by medical prophylaxis (29.9%). Course durations were in line with regulatory agency specifications. Only 43 (0.028%) major bleeding events and 478 (0.32%) deaths were observed. Adjusted IRRs for major bleeding or death were not significantly different for dalteparin/nadroparin, tinzaparin or fondaparinux compared to enoxaparin. CONCLUSION: Very low incidence rates of major bleeding and all-cause mortality were observed. Our study confirms the safety of LMWHs and fondaparinux in thrombo-prophylaxis in ambulatory settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02886533.
PURPOSE: Low-dose parenteral anticoagulation has demonstrated its efficacy for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in randomized trials. However, current practice is not widely documented. In ambulatory settings, we aimed to provide an overview of the clinical use of low-dose parenteral anticoagulation in France and to assess the incidence of major bleeding and death rates. METHODS: A population-based prospective cohort study using the French national health data system (SNIIRAM) identified 142,815 adults living in five well-defined geographical areas who had a course of low-dose parenteral anticoagulants (a total of 150,389 courses) in the period 2013-2015. The main outcome measures were the types of low-dose parenteral anticoagulant, the duration and the clinical context. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) were derived from Poisson models. RESULTS: Enoxaparin was the most frequently prescribed anticoagulant (58.9%) followed by tinzaparin (27.3%) and fondaparinux (10.9%). Patients receiving unfractionated heparin (N = 766, 0.53%) were older, more frequently had renal disease (48.75%) and had a higher modified HAS-B(L)ED score (≥ 3 in 61.6%) than patients receiving low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Surgical thrombo-prophylaxis was the most frequent indication (47.6%), followed by medical prophylaxis (29.9%). Course durations were in line with regulatory agency specifications. Only 43 (0.028%) major bleeding events and 478 (0.32%) deaths were observed. Adjusted IRRs for major bleeding or death were not significantly different for dalteparin/nadroparin, tinzaparin or fondaparinux compared to enoxaparin. CONCLUSION: Very low incidence rates of major bleeding and all-cause mortality were observed. Our study confirms the safety of LMWHs and fondaparinux in thrombo-prophylaxis in ambulatory settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02886533.
Authors: Shannon M Bates; Ian A Greer; Saskia Middeldorp; David L Veenstra; Anne-Marie Prabulos; Per Olav Vandvik Journal: Chest Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Michael K Gould; David A Garcia; Sherry M Wren; Paul J Karanicolas; Juan I Arcelus; John A Heit; Charles M Samama Journal: Chest Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Joshua Montroy; Manoj M Lalu; Rebecca C Auer; Emma Grigor; Sasha Mazzarello; Marc Carrier; Jonathan Kimmelman; Dean A Fergusson Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: A Kapoor; A Ellis; N Shaffer; J Gurwitz; A Chandramohan; J Saulino; A Ishak; T Okubanjo; F Michota; E Hylek; T A Trikalinos Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Aniek Ag Zee; Kelly van Lieshout; Maaike van der Heide; Loes Janssen; Heinrich Mj Janzing Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-08-06
Authors: M M Samama; A T Cohen; J Y Darmon; L Desjardins; A Eldor; C Janbon; A Leizorovicz; H Nguyen; C G Olsson; A G Turpie; N Weisslinger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-09-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elie A Akl; Lara A Kahale; Maram B Hakoum; Charbel F Matar; Francesca Sperati; Maddalena Barba; Victor E D Yosuico; Irene Terrenato; Anneliese Synnot; Holger Schünemann Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-09-11