| Literature DB >> 35385538 |
Jie Feng1, Fang Liao2, Deying Kong3, Ruihua Ren1, Tao Sun3, Wei Liu1, Yanyan Yin1, Haoyu Ma1, Jiahao Tang1, Guanrong Li1.
Abstract
For better understanding the genetic diversity and phylogeny of the cultivated Salvia miltiorrhiza populations, four intergenic spacer sequences, ETS, psbA-trnH, trnL-trnF, and ycf1-rps15 of the 40 populations collected from China were Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplified, analyzed both individually and in combination. Haplotype diversity analysis showed that the cultivated S. miltiorrhiza populations had a very rich genetic diversity and an excellent capacity to resist environmental pressure. The best-fit nucleotide substitution models for ETS, psbA-trnH, trnL-trnF, ycf1-rps15, and their combined sequences were HKY+I, T92, T92, T92+G, and T92+G, respectively; the nucleotide conversion frequency in the combined sequences was lower than the transversion, and the relatively high nucleotide substitution frequencies suggests its high genetic variability. Neutral tests showed that the spacer sequences of the populations conform with the neutral evolution model, and there has been no current expansion events occurred. Phylogeny analyses based on both the individual and the combined sequences showed that the 40 populations were clustered in two clades with a very similar topological structure. The discrimination rate of the combined sequence marker is significantly increased to 52.5% (21 populations) over the highest 35% (13 populations) by the single marker of ETS, though still inadequate but a big step forward. Further exploration of more DNA markers is needed. This study for the first time revealed the rich genetic diversity and phylogeny of the currently cultivated S. miltiorrhiza populations in China and provides novel alternative molecular markers for the genetic identification and resources evaluation of the cultivated S. miltiorrhiza populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35385538 PMCID: PMC8985983 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Cultivated S. miltiorrhiza populations used in this study.
| No. | Population/Voucher | Production Region | Source | No. | Population/Voucher | Production Region | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | V-HBAG-V-2 | Anguo, Hebei Hebei | Fenghong Seed Industry | 21 | B-SCZJ-V-2 | Zhongjiang, Sichuan | Hengda Seed Industry |
| 02 | V-CQ-V-2 | Chongqing | Hengda Seed Industry | 22 | B-SD-V-1 | Shandong | Tongda Seed Industry |
| 03 | V-JXJA-V-2 | Ji-an, Jiangxi Jiangxi | Hengda Seed Industry | 23 | R-HBAG-V-2 | Anguo, Hebei | Fenghong Seed industry |
| 04 | V-JLCC-V-2 | Changchun, Jilin | Hengda Seed Industry | 24 | R-HNFC-V-2 | Fangcheng, Henan | Hengda Seed Industry |
| 05 | V-JSSY-V-2 | Shuyang, Jiangsu | Hengda Seed Industry | 25 | R-SDJX-V-2 | Juxian, Shandong | Hengda Seed Industry |
| 06 | V-GZ-V-1 | Guizhou | Tongda Seed Industry | 26 | R-GX-V-2 | Guangxi | Hengda Seed Industry |
| 07 | V-GD-V-1 | Guangdong | Tongda Seed Industry | 27 | R-NM-V-2 | Nemeng | Hengda Seed Industry |
| 08 | V-GD-V-2 | Guangdong | Hengda Seed Industry | 28 | R-HNCS-V-2 | Changsha, Hunan Hunan | Hengda Seed Industry |
| 09 | V-GSLX-V-2 | Longxi, Gansu | Fenghong Seed industry | 29 | R-GSJQ-V-2 | Jiuquan, Gansu | Hengda Seed Industry |
| 10 | V-BJ-V-2 | Beijing | Fenghong Seed industry | 30 | W-SCHY-W-1 | Hongyuan, Sichuan | Self-collected |
| 11 | V-YNLJ-V-2 | Lijiang, Yunnan | Hengda Seed Industry | 31 | W-SXXA-bV-2 | Xi’an, Shaanxi | Hengda Seed Industry |
| 12 | V-GZZY-V-2 | Zunyi, Guizhou | Hengda Seed Industry | 32 | W-LNSY-V-2 | Shenyang, Liaoning | Hengda Seed Industry |
| 13 | V-SC-V-1 | Sichuan | Tongda Seed Industry | 33 | W-FJLY-V-2 | Luoyuan, Fujian | Hengda Seed Industry |
| 14 | V-SD-V-1 | Shandong | Tongda Seed Industry | 34 | W-GZ-V-1 | Guizhou | Tongda Seed Industry |
| 15 | V-JS-V-1 | Jiangsu | Tongda Seed Industry | 35 | W-SD-V-1 | Shandong | Tongda Seed Industry |
| 16 | V-HNYZ-bV-2 | Yongzhou, Hunan | Hengda Seed Industry | 36 | W-JS-V-1 | Jiangsu | Tongda Seed Industry |
| 17 | B-SC-V-1 | Sichuan | Tongda Seed Industry | 37 | W-SC-V-1 | Sichuan | Tongda Seed Industry |
| 18 | B-AHQJ-V-2 | Quanjiao, Anhui | Hengda Seed Industry | 38 | W-GD-V-1 | Guangdong | Tongda Seed Industry |
| 19 | B-GD-V-1 | Guangdong | Tongda Seed Industry | 39 | W-HBJM-V-2 | Jingmen Hubei | Hengda Seed Industry |
| 20 | B-JS-V-1 | Jiangsu | Tongda Seed Industry | 40 | W-YNLJ-V-2 | Lijiang, Yunnan | Hengda Seed Industry |
Primers used in this study.
| Locus | Primer code | Sequences(5’→3’) | Ta (°C) | Length (nt) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ETS-bdf1 (F) |
| 55 | 19 | [ |
| 18S-IGS (R) |
| 22 | [ | ||
|
| psbAF |
| 55 | 22 | [ |
| trnHR |
| 23 | [ | ||
|
| trn-c (F) |
| 57 | 20 | [ |
| trn-f (R) |
| 20 | [ | ||
|
| ycf15711f |
| 53 | 24 | [ |
| ycf1rps15r |
| 26 | [ |
Notes: F(f) and R(r): Forward and reverse primers respectively; Ta: Annealing temperature; nt: Nucleotides.
General features of the intergenic spacers of the cultivated S. miltiorrhiza populations.
| Intergenic spacer |
|
|
|
| Combined seq. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length range (bp) | 421~433 | 335~348 | 298~306 | 431~434 | 1488–1517 |
| Matrix length | 440 | 364 | 325 | 455 | 1584 |
| Average GC (%) | 56.8~62.8 | 22.4~26.2 | 35.0~36.9 | 25.9~30.5 | 35.9–38.8 |
| Sites with alignment gaps or missing data | 36 | 46 | 43 | 55 | 179 |
| Variable sites (%) | 241 (54.8) | 90 (24.7) | 25 (7.7) | 105 (23.1) | 466 (29.4) |
| Singleton variable sites | 36 | 19 | 1 | 17 | 74 |
| Parsimony informative sites (%) | 205 (46.6) | 71 (19.5) | 24 (7.4) | 88 (19.3) | 392 (24.7) |
| Best fit model | HKY+I | T92 | T92 | T92+G | T92+G |
| Relative identification (%) | 14 (35.0) | 8 (20.0) | 4 (10.0) | 11 (27.5) | 21 (52.5) |
Fig 1Nucleotide substitution frequencies of the individual and combined intergenic spacers of the cultivated S. miltiorrhiza populations.
Nucleotide diversity of the intergenic spacers of the cultivated S. miltiorrhiza populations.
| Marker | Hap | Hd | π | Vh | Sh | Fu and Li’s D* | Fu and Li’s F* | Tajima’s D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 16 | 0.64 | 0.11217 | 0.00795 | 0.089 | 0.22815 | -0.37550 | -1.27644 |
|
| 11 | 0.601 | 0.08478 | 0.00763 | 0.087 | 0.19802 | 0.53273 | 0.90040 |
|
| 4 | 0.619 | 0.03260 | 0.00326 | 0.057 | 1.44651 | 1.89841 | 1.90978 |
|
| 13 | 0.795 | 0.06830 | 0.00205 | 0.045 | -0.02679 | -0.19784 | -0.41630 |
| Combined seq. | 26 | 0.950 | 0.07870 | 0.0005 | 0.023 | 0.34297 | 0.08141 | -0.41550 |
Fig 2Phylogenetic trees based on the individual and combined intergenic spacers of the cultivated S. miltiorrhiza populations.
A: ETS; B: psbA-trnH; C: trnL-trnF; D: ycf1-rps15; E: Combined sequence.