| Literature DB >> 35384406 |
Alessandro Troglia1,2, Chiara Bigi1,2, Ivana Vobornik1, Jun Fujii1, Daniel Knez1, Regina Ciancio1, Goran Dražić3, Marius Fuchs4, Domenico Di Sante5,6, Giorgio Sangiovanni4, Giorgio Rossi1,2, Pasquale Orgiani1, Giancarlo Panaccione1.
Abstract
The formation and the evolution of electronic metallic states localized at the surface, commonly termed 2D electron gas (2DEG), represents a peculiar phenomenon occurring at the surface and interface of many transition metal oxides (TMO). Among TMO, titanium dioxide (TiO2 ), particularly in its anatase polymorph, stands as a prototypical system for the development of novel applications related to renewable energy, devices and sensors, where understanding the carrier dynamics is of utmost importance. In this study, angle-resolved photo-electron spectroscopy (ARPES) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) are used, supported by density functional theory (DFT), to follow the formation and the evolution of the 2DEG in TiO2 thin films. Unlike other TMO systems, it is revealed that, once the anatase fingerprint is present, the 2DEG in TiO2 is robust and stable down to a single-unit-cell, and that the electron filling of the 2DEG increases with thickness and eventually saturates. These results prove that no critical thickness triggers the occurrence of the 2DEG in anatase TiO2 and give insight in formation mechanism of electronic states at the surface of TMO.Entities:
Keywords: 2D electron gas; anatase; angle-resolved photo-electron spectroscopy; ultra-thin oxides
Year: 2022 PMID: 35384406 PMCID: PMC9165519 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202105114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 17.521
Figure 1a) Symmetrical θ–2θ high‐resolution XRD scan of a thick (i.e., more than 15 nm) sample of anatase TiO2 grown onto LAO (001) substrate. b) High‐resolution cross‐sectional STEM HAADF analysis showing film, buffer layer, and substrate with superimposed intensity profile over the LNO/TiO2 interface (red curve). The position of the LAO/LNO interface is highlighted by a yellow dashed line. c) XPS spectra of anatase TiO2 thin films grown onto LAO (001) substrate with and without a LNO buffer layer (blue/black curves respectively), acquired with a photon energy hν = 900 eV. d) ARPES band dispersion spectra of anatase TiO2 grown onto LAO (001) substrate with and without a LNO buffer layer. The spectra have been acquired at hν = 46 eV and horizontal polarization. e) EDCs extracted at k x=0.5 Å−1 (dashed lines in panel (d)). f) ARPES map in the first Brillouin zone (1 BZ) of anatase TiO2 grown onto LAO (001) substrate acquired at Fermi energy with a photon energy hν = 46 eV and horizontal polarization. g) ARPES spectrum of the metallic state of anatase TiO2 grown onto LAO (001) substrate acquired with a photon energy hν = 46 eV and horizontal polarization around the point of the second Brillouin zone (2 BZ).
Figure 2Evolution of the Ti L‐edge XAS spectrum as a function of anatase TiO2 film thickness, namely 5, 3, 1, and 0.75 u.c. The characteristic splitting of the eg levels is marked by black arrows.
Figure 3a) Evolution of the ARPES spectrum of the metallic state as a function of anatase TiO2 film thickness, namely 5, 3, 1, and 0.75 u.c. The spectra have been acquired at hν=46 eV around the point of the second Brillouin zone. The dark shaded area marked by black arrows is a 2DEG replica. b) MDCs extracted at Fermi energy in correspondence with the dashed lines in panel (a). As a comparison, a MDC extracted at Fermi energy of a thick anatase TiO2 sample (20 u.c.) is also reported (dark grey curve).
Figure 4a) Atomic structure of TiO2 thin film: the Ti atoms are shown by means of blue spheres. The TiO2 surface is terminated by a fully‐relaxed 4×1 reconstruction. b–d) Electronic structures for several different TiO2 thicknesses. The oxygen p manifold (in red) is separated from the titanium d bands (in blue). The latter disperse parabolically around the Γ point and give origin to the 2DEG. e) Evolution of the 2DEG onset as estimated by ARPES measurements (purple line) in comparison with the ab‐initio results (green line).