Kyle T Mitchell1, Stephen L Schmidt2,3, Jeffrey W Cooney1, Warren M Grill2,3,4, Jennifer Peters2,3, Shervin Rahimpour2,5, Hui-Jie Lee6, Sin-Ho Jung6, Sneha Mantri1, Burton Scott1, Shivanand P Lad2, Dennis A Turner2,3,4. 1. Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 4. Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 6. Duke University CTSI Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Research Design, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy in advanced Parkinson disease (PD). Although both subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus (GP) DBS show equivalent efficacy in PD, combined stimulation may demonstrate synergism. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical benefit of stimulating a combination of STN and GP DBS leads and to demonstrate biomarker discovery for adaptive DBS therapy in an observational study. METHODS: We performed a pilot trial (n = 3) of implanting bilateral STN and GP DBS leads, connected to a bidirectional implantable pulse generator (Medtronic Summit RC + S; NCT03815656, IDE No. G180280). Initial 1-year outcome in 3 patients included Unified PD Rating Scale on and off medications, medication dosage, Hauser diary, and recorded beta frequency spectral power. RESULTS: Combined DBS improved PD symptom control, allowing >80% levodopa medication reduction. There was a greater decrease in off-medication motor Unified PD Rating Scale with multiple electrodes activated (mean difference from off stimulation off medications -18.2, range -25.5 to -12.5) than either STN (-12.8, range -20.5 to 0) or GP alone (-9, range -11.5 to -4.5). Combined DBS resulted in a greater reduction of beta oscillations in STN in 5/6 hemispheres than either site alone. Adverse events occurred in 2 patients, including a small cortical hemorrhage and seizure at 24 hours postoperatively, which resolved spontaneously, and extension wire scarring requiring revision at 2 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Patients with PD preferred combined DBS stimulation in this preliminary cohort. Future studies will address efficacy of adaptive DBS as we further define biomarkers and control policy.
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy in advanced Parkinson disease (PD). Although both subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus (GP) DBS show equivalent efficacy in PD, combined stimulation may demonstrate synergism. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical benefit of stimulating a combination of STN and GP DBS leads and to demonstrate biomarker discovery for adaptive DBS therapy in an observational study. METHODS: We performed a pilot trial (n = 3) of implanting bilateral STN and GP DBS leads, connected to a bidirectional implantable pulse generator (Medtronic Summit RC + S; NCT03815656, IDE No. G180280). Initial 1-year outcome in 3 patients included Unified PD Rating Scale on and off medications, medication dosage, Hauser diary, and recorded beta frequency spectral power. RESULTS: Combined DBS improved PD symptom control, allowing >80% levodopa medication reduction. There was a greater decrease in off-medication motor Unified PD Rating Scale with multiple electrodes activated (mean difference from off stimulation off medications -18.2, range -25.5 to -12.5) than either STN (-12.8, range -20.5 to 0) or GP alone (-9, range -11.5 to -4.5). Combined DBS resulted in a greater reduction of beta oscillations in STN in 5/6 hemispheres than either site alone. Adverse events occurred in 2 patients, including a small cortical hemorrhage and seizure at 24 hours postoperatively, which resolved spontaneously, and extension wire scarring requiring revision at 2 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Patients with PD preferred combined DBS stimulation in this preliminary cohort. Future studies will address efficacy of adaptive DBS as we further define biomarkers and control policy.
Authors: Siobhan Ewert; Philip Plettig; Ningfei Li; M Mallar Chakravarty; D Louis Collins; Todd M Herrington; Andrea A Kühn; Andreas Horn Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-05-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kenneth A Follett; Frances M Weaver; Matthew Stern; Kwan Hur; Crystal L Harris; Ping Luo; William J Marks; Johannes Rothlind; Oren Sagher; Claudia Moy; Rajesh Pahwa; Kim Burchiel; Penelope Hogarth; Eugene C Lai; John E Duda; Kathryn Holloway; Ali Samii; Stacy Horn; Jeff M Bronstein; Gatana Stoner; Philip A Starr; Richard Simpson; Gordon Baltuch; Antonio De Salles; Grant D Huang; Domenic J Reda Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael S Okun; Hubert H Fernandez; Samuel S Wu; Lindsey Kirsch-Darrow; Dawn Bowers; Frank Bova; Michele Suelter; Charles E Jacobson; Xinping Wang; Clifford W Gordon; Pam Zeilman; Janet Romrell; Pam Martin; Herbert Ward; Ramon L Rodriguez; Kelly D Foote Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: W M M Schuepbach; J Rau; K Knudsen; J Volkmann; P Krack; L Timmermann; T D Hälbig; H Hesekamp; S M Navarro; N Meier; D Falk; M Mehdorn; S Paschen; M Maarouf; M T Barbe; G R Fink; A Kupsch; D Gruber; G-H Schneider; E Seigneuret; A Kistner; P Chaynes; F Ory-Magne; C Brefel Courbon; J Vesper; A Schnitzler; L Wojtecki; J-L Houeto; B Bataille; D Maltête; P Damier; S Raoul; F Sixel-Doering; D Hellwig; A Gharabaghi; R Krüger; M O Pinsker; F Amtage; J-M Régis; T Witjas; S Thobois; P Mertens; M Kloss; A Hartmann; W H Oertel; B Post; H Speelman; Y Agid; C Schade-Brittinger; G Deuschl Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrea A Kühn; Florian Kempf; Christof Brücke; Louise Gaynor Doyle; Irene Martinez-Torres; Alek Pogosyan; Thomas Trottenberg; Andreas Kupsch; Gerd-Helge Schneider; Marwan I Hariz; Wim Vandenberghe; Bart Nuttin; Peter Brown Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-06-11 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Nicole C Swann; Coralie de Hemptinne; Margaret C Thompson; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Andrew M Miller; Ro'ee Gilron; Jill L Ostrem; Howard J Chizeck; Philip A Starr Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Anders Christian Meidahl; Gerd Tinkhauser; Damian Marc Herz; Hayriye Cagnan; Jean Debarros; Peter Brown Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 10.338