Literature DB >> 23406026

Neurostimulation for Parkinson's disease with early motor complications.

W M M Schuepbach1, J Rau, K Knudsen, J Volkmann, P Krack, L Timmermann, T D Hälbig, H Hesekamp, S M Navarro, N Meier, D Falk, M Mehdorn, S Paschen, M Maarouf, M T Barbe, G R Fink, A Kupsch, D Gruber, G-H Schneider, E Seigneuret, A Kistner, P Chaynes, F Ory-Magne, C Brefel Courbon, J Vesper, A Schnitzler, L Wojtecki, J-L Houeto, B Bataille, D Maltête, P Damier, S Raoul, F Sixel-Doering, D Hellwig, A Gharabaghi, R Krüger, M O Pinsker, F Amtage, J-M Régis, T Witjas, S Thobois, P Mertens, M Kloss, A Hartmann, W H Oertel, B Post, H Speelman, Y Agid, C Schade-Brittinger, G Deuschl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subthalamic stimulation reduces motor disability and improves quality of life in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease who have severe levodopa-induced motor complications. We hypothesized that neurostimulation would be beneficial at an earlier stage of Parkinson's disease.
METHODS: In this 2-year trial, we randomly assigned 251 patients with Parkinson's disease and early motor complications (mean age, 52 years; mean duration of disease, 7.5 years) to undergo neurostimulation plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone. The primary end point was quality of life, as assessed with the use of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) summary index (with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating worse function). Major secondary outcomes included parkinsonian motor disability, activities of daily living, levodopa-induced motor complications (as assessed with the use of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, parts III, II, and IV, respectively), and time with good mobility and no dyskinesia.
RESULTS: For the primary outcome of quality of life, the mean score for the neurostimulation group improved by 7.8 points, and that for the medical-therapy group worsened by 0.2 points (between-group difference in mean change from baseline to 2 years, 8.0 points; P=0.002). Neurostimulation was superior to medical therapy with respect to motor disability (P<0.001), activities of daily living (P<0.001), levodopa-induced motor complications (P<0.001), and time with good mobility and no dyskinesia (P=0.01). Serious adverse events occurred in 54.8% of the patients in the neurostimulation group and in 44.1% of those in the medical-therapy group. Serious adverse events related to surgical implantation or the neurostimulation device occurred in 17.7% of patients. An expert panel confirmed that medical therapy was consistent with practice guidelines for 96.8% of the patients in the neurostimulation group and for 94.5% of those in the medical-therapy group.
CONCLUSIONS: Subthalamic stimulation was superior to medical therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease and early motor complications. (Funded by the German Ministry of Research and others; EARLYSTIM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00354133.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23406026     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  318 in total

Review 1.  [Therapeutic applications of closed-loop brain stimulation. Success and expectations].

Authors:  C Zrenner; U Ziemann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Modern treatment in Parkinson's disease, a personal approach.

Authors:  Heinz Reichmann
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Todd M Herrington; Jennifer J Cheng; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Understanding the human pedunculopontine nucleus in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Anders Fytagoridis; Peter A Silburn; Terry J Coyne; Wesley Thevathasan
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Optimizing the deep brain stimulation care pathway in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  N J Thomas; P Mertens; T Danaila; G Polo; H Klinger; E Broussolle; S Thobois
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Dynamics of device-based treatments for Parkinson's disease in Germany from 2010 to 2017: application of continuous subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, and deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel Richter; Dirk Bartig; Wolfgang Jost; Christoph Jörges; Britta Stumpe; Ralf Gold; Christos Krogias; Lars Tönges
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Toward Electrophysiology-Based Intelligent Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders.

Authors:  Andrea A Kühn; R Mark Richardson; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Robert S Turner; Benjamin Blankertz; Tom Mitchell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  STN vs. GPi Deep Brain Stimulation: Translating the Rematch into Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Nolan R Williams; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2014-04-01

Review 9.  Parkinson's disease: an update on pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  Tom Foltynie; Joshua Kahan
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  The Impact of Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease on Couple Satisfaction: An 18-Month Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Marc Baertschi; Nicolas Favez; João Flores Alves Dos Santos; Michalina Radomska; François Herrmann; Pierre Burkhard; Alessandra Canuto; Kerstin Weber
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.