Literature DB >> 35381872

Comparison of Responses to DCN vs. VCN Stimulation in a Mouse Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI).

Stephen McInturff1,2, Florent-Valéry Coen3, Ariel E Hight4,5, Osama Tarabichi4,6, Vivek V Kanumuri4,6, Nicolas Vachicouras3, Stéphanie P Lacour3, Daniel J Lee4,5,6, M Christian Brown4,5,6.   

Abstract

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an auditory neuroprosthesis that provides hearing to deaf patients by electrically stimulating the cochlear nucleus (CN) of the brainstem. Whether such stimulation activates one or the other of the CN's two major subdivisions is not known. Here, we demonstrate clear response differences from the stimulation of the dorsal (D) vs. ventral (V) subdivisions of the CN in a mouse model of the ABI with a surface-stimulating electrode array. For the DCN, low levels of stimulation evoked multiunit responses in the inferior colliculus (IC) that were unimodally distributed with early latencies (avg. peak latency of 3.3 ms). However, high levels of stimulation evoked a bimodal distribution with the addition of a late latency response peak (avg. peak latency of 7.1 ms). For the VCN, in contrast, electrical stimulation elicited multiunit responses that were usually unimodal and had a latency similar to the DCN's late response. Local field potentials (LFP) from the IC showed components that correlated with early and late multiunit responses. Surgical cuts to sever the output of the DCN, the dorsal acoustic stria (DAS), gave insight into the origin of these early and late responses. Cuts eliminated early responses but had little-to-no effect on late responses. The early responses thus originate from cells that project through the DAS, such as DCN's pyramidal and giant cells. Late responses likely arise from the spread of stimulation from a DCN-placed electrode array to the VCN and could originate in bushy and/or stellate cells. In human ABI users, the spread of stimulation in the CN may result in abnormal response patterns that could hinder performance.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear nucleus; Deafness; Inferior colliculus; Local field potential; Multiunit activity; Neuroprosthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35381872      PMCID: PMC9085982          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-022-00840-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  53 in total

1.  Rate representation of tones in noise in the inferior colliculus of decerebrate cats.

Authors:  R Ramachandran; K A Davis; B J May
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-09

2.  Single unit activity in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat.

Authors:  D A Godfrey; N Y Kiang; B E Norris
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1975-07-15       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Vowel representations in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat: effects of level, background noise, and behavioral state.

Authors:  B J May; G S Prell; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A map of functional synaptic connectivity in the mouse anteroventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Luke Campagnola; Paul B Manis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Auditory Brainstem Implant Array Position Varies Widely Among Adult and Pediatric Patients and Is Associated With Perception.

Authors:  Samuel R Barber; Elliott D Kozin; Aaron K Remenschneider; Sidharth V Puram; Max Smith; Barbara S Herrmann; Mary E Cunnane; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Responses of neurons in the feline inferior colliculus to modulated electrical stimuli applied on and within the ventral cochlear nucleus; Implications for an advanced auditory brainstem implant.

Authors:  Douglas McCreery; Kamal Yadev; Martin Han
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.

Authors:  W S Rhode; S Greenberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Open set speech perception with auditory brainstem implant?

Authors:  Vittorio Colletti; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Organization of dorsal cochlear nucleus type IV unit response maps and their relationship to activation by bandlimited noise.

Authors:  G A Spirou; E D Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The cochlear nuclei in man.

Authors:  J K Moore; K K Osen
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1979-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.