Literature DB >> 22077242

Dialkyl phosphates as biomarkers of organophosphates: the current divide between epidemiology and clinical toxicology.

Daniel L Sudakin1, David L Stone.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Organophosphate insecticides are widely utilized throughout the world. The cholinergic toxidrome, resulting from cholinesterase inhibition, is the clinically relevant endpoint in organophosphate poisoning. In recent years, urinary dialkyl phosphates (DAPs) have emerged as a common method of assessing exposure to organophosphates in epidemiological investigations. Using dialkyl phosphates as biomarkers of exposure to organophosphates, several recent epidemiological studies have reported associations with adverse health outcomes. The purpose of this article is to review the application and limitations of urinary DAPs as biomarkers of exposure to organophosphate insecticides.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted of the PubMed database, using keywords "dialkylphosphate" and "dialkyl phosphate." The scientific literature was reviewed to identify sources of dialkyl phosphate metabolites from in vivo metabolism of organophosphates, and as environmental degradation products. Epidemiological investigations were reviewed to summarize the use of use of DAPs as biomarkers in cross-sectional studies, occupational exposures, acute poisonings, and in health outcome studies. Emphasis was placed on the assessment of DAPs in the context of existing biomarker frameworks, as defined by the National Research Council. Studies were assessed for concurrent use of cholinesterase activity as a biomarker of effect, and whether a dose-response relationship could be determined between DAPs and cholinesterase depression or cholinergic effects.
RESULTS: Over 184 publications were identified, describing dialkyl phosphates and their use as biomarkers of exposure. The in vivo metabolism of organophosphates yields different DAPs, depending upon whether they undergo bioactivation or detoxification. The detection of urinary DAPs does not provide specificity with respect to the organophosphate from which they were derived, or their toxicological potency. Several recent studies documented the common presence of DAPs in residential environments and foods. Experimental studies support that DAPs have significant oral bioavailability, and undergo little to no metabolism prior to urinary excretion. Cross-sectional studies in multiple countries confirm that urinary DAPs are commonly detectable in the general population. No occupational studies were identified supporting a dose-response relationship between DAPs and significant cholinesterase inhibition. No occupational studies were identified supporting evidence of a threshold level of DAPs excretion at which clinical cholinergic signs or symptoms have been observed. Recent prospective epidemiological studies using DAPs as biomarkers have not concurrently assessed effects on cholinesterase activity, or conducted analyses that distinguish different DAPs that reflect bioactivation versus detoxification pathways. DISCUSSION: There are numerous limitations to the use of DAPs as biomarkers of exposure. These include a lack of specificity with respect to the organophosphate from which they were derived, and a growing body of evidence that toxicologically irrelevant DAPs are commonly encountered in food and the environment. Substantial intra- and inter-day variability has been reported for dialkyl phosphate excretion in humans, which is problematic for studies that rely on single measurements to assess exposure. The toxicological distinction between different DAPs reflecting biomarkers of activation and detoxification processes has not been considered in some prospective epidemiological studies. A relationship between DAPs as biomarkers of exposure and the critical biomarker of effect, cholinesterase activity, has not been established.
CONCLUSIONS: The science of exposure assessment using DAPs as biomarkers is not advancing, and this complicates the interpretation of epidemiological studies. At the current time, DAPs have very limited utility in clinical toxicology or in the risk assessment process for organophosphates. Until these limitations are addressed, the appropriate role of DAPs in the assessment of human health risks from organophosphates is unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22077242     DOI: 10.3109/15563650.2011.624101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-3650            Impact factor:   4.467


  20 in total

Review 1.  Neurodevelopmental effects in children associated with exposure to organophosphate pesticides: a systematic review.

Authors:  María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada; Boris A Lucero; Dana B Barr; Kyle Steenland; Karen Levy; P Barry Ryan; Veronica Iglesias; Sergio Alvarado; Carlos Concha; Evelyn Rojas; Catalina Vega
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 2.  Protein adducts as biomarkers of exposure to organophosphorus compounds.

Authors:  Judit Marsillach; Lucio G Costa; Clement E Furlong
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 3.  Environmental and occupational pesticide exposure and human sperm parameters: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sheena E Martenies; Melissa J Perry
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Dialkyl phosphate urinary metabolites and chromosomal abnormalities in human sperm.

Authors:  Zaida I Figueroa; Heather A Young; John D Meeker; Sheena E Martenies; Dana Boyd Barr; George Gray; Melissa J Perry
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Comparison of questionnaire-based estimation of pesticide residue intake from fruits and vegetables with urinary concentrations of pesticide biomarkers.

Authors:  Yu-Han Chiu; Paige L Williams; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Matthew Gillman; Qi Sun; Maria Ospina; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Pesticide interactions and risks of sperm chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Zaida I Figueroa; Heather A Young; Sunni L Mumford; John D Meeker; Dana B Barr; George M Gray; Melissa J Perry
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 5.840

7.  Reliability of concentrations of organophosphate pesticide metabolites in serial urine specimens from pregnancy in the Generation R Study.

Authors:  Suzanne Spaan; Anjoeka Pronk; Holger M Koch; Todd A Jusko; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Pamela A Shaw; Henning M Tiemeier; Albert Hofman; Frank H Pierik; Matthew P Longnecker
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Prenatal organophosphorus pesticide exposure and executive function in preschool-aged children in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa).

Authors:  Jake E Thistle; Amanda Ramos; Kyle R Roell; Giehae Choi; Cherrel K Manley; Amber M Hall; Gro D Villanger; Enrique Cequier; Amrit K Sakhi; Cathrine Thomsen; Pål Zeiner; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud; Kristin R Øvergaard; Amy Herring; Heidi Aase; Stephanie M Engel
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 8.431

Review 9.  Pesticide exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes: review of the epidemiologic and animal studies.

Authors:  Carol J Burns; Laura J McIntosh; Pamela J Mink; Anne M Jurek; Abby A Li
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.393

10.  Quantification of glyphosate and other organophosphorus compounds in human urine via ion chromatography isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Andre Schütze; Pilar Morales-Agudelo; Meghan Vidal; Antonia M Calafat; Maria Ospina
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 8.943

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.