Literature DB >> 35380257

Current clinical practice and outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: analysis of individual data from 94,638 patients treated in 55 breast cancer centers.

O Ortmann1, J-U Blohmer2, N T Sibert3, S Brucker4, W Janni5, A Wöckel6, A Scharl7, S Dieng8, J Ferencz8, E C Inwald9, S Wesselmann3, C Kowalski3.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is frequently used in patients with early breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated similar survival after NACT or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). However, certain subtypes may benefit more when NACT contains regimes leading to high rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. In this study we analyzed data using the OncoBox research from 94,638 patients treated in 55 breast cancer centers to describe the current clinical practice of and outcomes after NACT under routine conditions. These data were compared to patients treated with ACT. 40% of all patients received chemotherapy. The use of NACT increased over time from 5% in 2007 up to 17.3% in 2016. The proportion of patients receiving NACT varied by subtype. It was low in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (5.8%). However, 31.8% of patients with triple-negative, 31.9% with HR-negative/HER2-positive, and 26.5% with HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer received NACT. The rates of pCR were higher in patients with HR-positive/HER2-positive, HR-negative/HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors (36, 53 and 38%) compared to HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors (12%). PCR was achieved more often in HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors over time.This is the largest study on use and effects of NACT in German breast cancer centers. It demonstrates the increased use of NACT based on recommendations in current clinical guidelines. An improvement of pCR was shown in particular in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, which is consistent with data from randomized controlled trails.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer centers; Early breast cancer; Guidelines; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Oncobox research

Year:  2022        PMID: 35380257     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-03938-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  9 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Petra Macaskill; Gunter von Minckwitz; Michael L Marinovich; Eleftherios Mamounas
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Quality of care in breast cancer centers: results of benchmarking by the German Cancer Society and German Society for Breast Diseases.

Authors:  Christoph Kowalski; Julia Ferencz; Sara Y Brucker; Rolf Kreienberg; Simone Wesselmann
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Dual HER2-blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer: a subanalysis of data from the randomized phase III GeparSepto trial.

Authors:  S Loibl; C Jackisch; A Schneeweiss; S Schmatloch; B Aktas; C Denkert; H Wiebringhaus; S Kümmel; M Warm; S Paepke; M Just; C Hanusch; J Hackmann; J-U Blohmer; M Clemens; S Dan Costa; B Gerber; K Engels; V Nekljudova; G von Minckwitz; M Untch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Recommendation of adjuvant trastuzumab treatment in HER-2-positive breast cancer patients: insights from quality indicator data collected in certified breast cancer centers in Germany, Italy, Austria, and Switzerland.

Authors:  E C Inwald; C Kowalski; S Wesselmann; J Ferencz; O Ortmann
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Time trends of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Fabian Riedel; Ann Sophie Hoffmann; Mareike Moderow; Sabine Heublein; Thomas M Deutsch; Michael Golatta; Markus Wallwiener; Andreas Schneeweiss; Joerg Heil; André Hennigs
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Clinical tumor stage is the most important predictor of pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Briete Goorts; Thiemo J A van Nijnatten; Linda de Munck; Martine Moossdorff; Esther M Heuts; Maaike de Boer; Marc B I Lobbes; Marjolein L Smidt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Screening-relevant age threshold of 70 years and older is a stronger determinant for the choice of adjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients than tumor biology.

Authors:  E C Inwald; O Ortmann; M Koller; F Zeman; F Hofstädter; M Evert; G Brockhoff; M Klinkhammer-Schalke
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Shifting cancer care towards Multidisciplinarity: the cancer center certification program of the German cancer society.

Authors:  Christoph Kowalski; Ullrich Graeven; Christof von Kalle; Hauke Lang; Matthias W Beckmann; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Martin Burchardt; Michael Ehrenfeld; Jan Fichtner; Stephan Grabbe; Hans Hoffmann; Heinrich Iro; Stefan Post; Anton Scharl; Uwe Schlegel; Thomas Seufferlein; Walter Stummer; Dieter Ukena; Julia Ferencz; Simone Wesselmann
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.