Literature DB >> 35379756

Trends in Outpatient Treatment for Depression in Survivors of Stroke in the United States, 2004-2017.

Liming Dong1, Briana Mezuk2, Linda S Williams2, Lynda D Lisabeth2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Depression is highly prevalent and persistent among survivors of stroke. It is unknown how treatment for depression among survivors of stroke has changed in the evolving context of stroke care and mental health care in the general US population, especially among vulnerable sociodemographic subgroups who bear higher risks for stroke and unfavorable poststroke outcomes and experience disparities in access to and quality of stroke and mental health care. The study examined temporal trends in outpatient treatment for depression among survivors of stroke in the United States between 2004 and 2017.
METHODS: The study sample consisted of 10,243 adult survivors of stroke and 264,645 adults without stroke drawn from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally representative survey in the United States. Trends in outpatient treatment for depression and potential unmet needs in the stroke population, including variations across sociodemographic subgroups, were examined and compared with the nonstroke population.
RESULTS: The rate of receipt of outpatient treatment for depression among survivors of stroke was 17.7% in 2004-2005 and 16.0% in 2016-2017 (adjusted odds ratio for period change [aOR] 0.90, 95% CI 0.71-1.15). Older, male, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic survivors of stroke were less likely to receive treatment for depression. Approximately two-thirds of survivors of stroke who screened positive for depression received no outpatient treatment during a calendar year. The sociodemographic disparities and treatment gap persisted during the study period, which differed from the nonstroke population. Among survivors of stroke who received any treatment for depression, there was a remarkable increase in use of psychotherapy (aOR 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-4.01), despite its less frequent use compared with pharmacotherapy. DISCUSSION: Although depression is common after stroke, the majority of survivors of stroke receive no treatment for depression. This gap has remained largely unchanged over past decades, with substantial sociodemographic differences. Efforts are needed to improve depression care for survivors of stroke and reduce disparities.
© 2022 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35379756      PMCID: PMC9162167          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   11.800


  39 in total

1.  Cultural mistrust of white mental health clinicians among African Americans with severe mental illness.

Authors:  A L Whaley
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  2001-04

Review 2.  Design strategies and innovations in the medical expenditure panel survey.

Authors:  Steven B Cohen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Changes in racial-ethnic disparities in use and adequacy of mental health care in the United States, 1990–2003.

Authors:  Andrea Alexis Ault-Brutus
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.

Authors:  Philip S Wang; Patricia Berglund; Mark Olfson; Harold A Pincus; Kenneth B Wells; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06

5.  Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2).

Authors:  Bernd Löwe; Kurt Kroenke; Kerstin Gräfe
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 6.  Stroke declines from third to fourth leading cause of death in the United States: historical perspective and challenges ahead.

Authors:  Amytis Towfighi; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jay C Fournier; Robert J DeRubeis; Steven D Hollon; Sona Dimidjian; Jay D Amsterdam; Richard C Shelton; Jan Fawcett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  Efficacy of antidepressants and benzodiazepines in minor depression: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Corrado Barbui; Andrea Cipriani; Vikram Patel; José L Ayuso-Mateos; Mark van Ommeren
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 10.  Natural history, predictors and outcomes of depression after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Ayerbe; Salma Ayis; Charles D A Wolfe; Anthony G Rudd
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 9.319

View more
  2 in total

1.  Association between depression and quality of life in stroke patients: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) IV-VII (2008-2018).

Authors:  Sun Woo Kang; Sook-Hyun Lee; Ye-Seul Lee; Seungwon Kwon; Peggy Bosch; Yoon Jae Lee; In-Hyuk Ha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Brain alterations of regional homogeneity, degree centrality, and functional connectivity in vulnerable carotid plaque patients with neither clinical symptoms nor routine MRI lesions: A resting-state fMRI study.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Wu Xing; Lirong Ouyang; Lang Li; Hong Jin; Shuai Yang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.152

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.