Roles of C-reactive protein polymorphisms and life event changes on cognitive function in bipolar patients receiving valproate.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) exhibit an inflamed condition that is associated with metabolic disturbance and cognitive impairment. Whether inflammation, represented by C-reactive protein (CRP), is causally associated with BD and influences treatment outcome has not been established.
METHODS: We examined whether CRP is a causal factor for the risk of BD in drug-naïve, depressed BD patients and investigated whether polymorphisms in CRP and life event changes influence cognitive function in BD patients receiving valproate (VPA) treatment.
RESULTS: Our results showed that BD patients had significantly higher CRP levels and worse cognitive function than the controls, while the frequencies of CRP single nucleotide polymorphisms in BD patients and in controls were not different. In addition, the life event scale score was higher for BD patients than for controls. Furthermore, the genotypes of CRP polymorphisms and the interactions between polymorphisms of CRP and life event scale score had a significant influence on cognitive performance in BD patients after 12 weeks of VPA treatment.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated the clinical utility of the application of functional genetics in clarifying the interactions among CRP, life event stress, and BD and suggested the important roles of CRP gene-environment interactions in developing treatment strategies for BD.

Introduction

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a mental disorder with a high prevalence of metabolic disturbances and cognitive impairment. An increasing amount of evidence suggests that inflammatory and immune alterations may be involved in the pathogenesis of BD, while inflammation is also associated with metabolic disturbances and cognitive impairment. In addition, the condition of greater inflammation observed in BD might explain why the estimated risk of dementia is higher for BD than for major depression.[1,2] Proinflammatory cytokines may be potential mediators of interactions between the immune-neuroendocrine system and pathways related to mood and energy, contributing to alterations in brain function in cases of BD.[3,4] Additionally, cognitive impairments have been documented in cases of BD,[5,6] especially in continuous performance and frontal executive tasks. These cognitive impairments may be long-lasting even in stable euthymic BD patients, which suggests an association with inflammatory status. Moreover, comorbidities with BD, metabolic abnormalities, and cognitive deficits contribute to increased long-term costs to the national health care system.[9,10] Therefore, to understand BD better and to help alleviate the burden of long-term costs to the national health care system from BD, it is important to study whether inflammation is causally associated with BD and treatment outcome, focusing on cognitive function. In addition, valproate (VPA), a mood stabilizer, is usually widely used in treating BD, and it could be used at different stages of BD, including depressive, manic, and maintenance phases. Among mood stabilizers, the trend in VPA use gradually increased and amounts of prescription were listed top one among patients newly diagnosed with BD in Taiwan. Previous reports suggest that VPA has neuroprotective effects.[13-15] Valproate increases levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mRNA and increases the activity of BDNF promoter IV in rat cortical neurons. Valproate also protects dopaminergic neurons in midbrain neurons by stimulating the release of neurotrophic factors from astrocytes. Therefore, we focused on the treatment outcome of VPA in cases of BD.

C-reactive protein (CRP), which is synthesized by hepatocytes, is an acute-phase protein arising in response to proinflammatory cytokines, endogenous signals of innate immunity, and tissue damage. C-reactive protein levels have been a biomarker for the risk of cardiovascular diseases and metabolic disturbances.[16,17] In addition, previous studies have revealed significantly higher CRP levels in patients with BD than in healthy controls, but this was not the case for major depressive disorder (MDD) patients.[1,18] An elevated CRP level is also an important risk factor for the onset of manic symptoms in depressed patients during 2 years of follow-up. Furthermore, CRP levels in individuals with BD are significantly associated with disease severity and could be a marker of mood state.[1,21,22] However, whether elevated CRP levels are causally associated with BD has not yet been established because of study design issues and confounding factors, such as mood stage and use of medications.

Helpful methods for the clinical use of measured variation in genes of known function as instrumental variables have been suggested to examine the causal effect of modifiable exposure on disease in observational studies.[23,24] Causal relationships between CRP and BD could not be determined in clinical practice since CRP levels vary across mood states, levels of medication use, and study design in the context of BD patients. Thus, Mendelian randomization analysis provides a more reliable indication of the likely causal role of CRP in the development of BD. According to previous studies, some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the CRP gene, including SNPs rs1205, rs2794520, rs1800947, and rs1130864, accounted for up to 25–40% of the variance in CRP levels.[25,26] Due to the random distribution of gene variants during gametogenesis, the confounding effect can be extremely low. Thus, these SNPs were suitable for instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization analysis to estimate the effect of phenotypic exposures on BD. Therefore, in the current study, we aimed to examine whether CRP is a causal factor in BD risk by conducting a Mendelian randomization analysis in drug-naïve, depressed BD patients. In addition, we further investigated the question of whether the polymorphisms of CRP influence treatment outcome (represented by cognitive function) in BD patients after receiving 12 weeks of VPA treatment. We also examined whether there were interaction effects between polymorphisms of CRP and the stress of life event changes on treatment outcome.

Materials and methods

Subjects

The Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects at National Cheng Kung University Hospital approved the research protocol (IRB No. A-ER-104-031). All participants were recruited from outpatient settings at the National Cheng Kung University Hospital and provided written informed consent regarding their willingness to participate in the research (from March 2015 to August 2019). We also recruited controls from the community after individuals with mental illnesses were excluded by a senior psychiatrist using the Chinese version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatry Interview. All BD patients were initially evaluated via interview by an attending psychiatrist using the Chinese version of the Modified Schedule of Affective Disorder and Schizophrenia–Life Time, which has good interrater reliability, to determine diagnoses from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). To avoid possible confounding factors affecting the results, all BD patients exhibited BD II, indicating exclusion of BD I. The BD patients also met the following inclusion criteria: (i) diagnosis of BD II using the 2-days minimum for hypomania, (ii) major depressive status at the time of study entry, with a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score >15, (iii) drug-naïve and at first diagnosis with no history of treatment with mood stabilizers or antipsychotics, and (iv) no history of psychiatric or neurological disorder or alcohol or substance abuse. In addition, subjects meeting the following criteria are not prescribed to receive valproate treatment according to the guidance Taiwan Food and Drug Administration: (i) during pregnancy for the treatment of bipolar disorder, and (ii) women of childbearing potential unless they have birth control (contraception).

To avoid confounding factors interfering with plasma CRP level, all subjects meeting the following criteria were excluded through chart reviews and patient-reported questionnaires: (i) a serious surgical condition or physical illness, including all chronic diseases, heart disease, stroke, kidney dialysis, transplant, etc., (ii) patients who were pregnant or breastfeeding,[29,30] (iii) a DSM-5 diagnosis of substance abuse within the past 3 months, (iv) previous use of any psychotropic agent, (v) consumption of any anti-inflammatory medication within the past 3 months, having autoimmune disorder, or having an infectious status (plasma CRP >7 mg/L), and (vi) having an organic mental disease, mental disability or dementia.[33,34]

All of the control subjects underwent cognitive function tests. Among BD patients, 54 BD subjects underwent cognitive function tests after receiving VPA treatment for 12 weeks. BD patients were permitted to treat depressive symptoms (fluoxetine, up to 20 mg/day), and lorazepam (<8 mg) was used for night-time sedation and to treat agitation and insomnia during the study, the dosage of which was adjusted according to clinical manifestation and the patient’s tolerance.

Measurements

Fasting blood samples were collected between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. 10 milliliters of whole blood was withdrawn from the antecubital vein of each patient. Plasma, which was isolated from whole blood after centrifugation at 3000g for 15 min at 4°C, was immediately stored at −80°C. The plasma high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a human CRP Instant ELISA kit (Bender MedSystem GmbH, Vienna, Austria) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The limit of detection was 3 pg/mL, and the intra- and interassay coefficients of variation (CVs) were 6.9% and 13.1%, respectively.

Genomic DNA was extracted from each blood sample using a QIAamp DNA blood kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of the extracted genomic DNA was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis analysis. The DNA was stored at −80°C until use. The SNPs of the CRP genes rs1205, rs2794520, rs1130864, and rs1800947 were analyzed using commercially available TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and amplification and dissociation were carried out using an ABI 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The PCR system automatically calculated the negative derivative of the change in fluorescence. The SNP genotype of each tested sample was determined using the STEPONE software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) program and confirmed manually. In cases of disagreement, the analysis was repeated.

The serum trough concentration of VPA was assessed using the homogeneous enzyme immunoassay method and measured at the Union Clinical Laboratory (Taipei, Taiwan). The limit of detection was 3 μg/mL.

Cognitive function

Finger-tapping test

The Finger-tapping test (FTT) consists of tapping with the index finger on a computer mouse as many times as possible within 10 s. The test was repeated three consecutive times and performed randomly across subjects, and the order was kept constant for each subject at each session. The average number of taps was then calculated.

Continuous performance test

The Continuous Performance Test (CPT) is a psychological test for humans that primarily measures attention.[36,37] The critical stimulus may be defined either as a particular single stimulus out of the available set (X task: subjects were asked to respond to number “9”) or a particular sequence of two stimuli out of the available set (AX task: subjects were asked to respond whenever the number “9” was preceded by the number “1”). Only the AX task was used in the present study. Each test session began with 2 min of practice (repeated if necessary) to ensure that subjects knew how to press the button correctly. During the test, numbers from 0 to 9 were randomly presented for 50 milliseconds each at a rate of one per second. Each subject underwent two sessions, including the nonmasked task and the 25% masked task. During the masked session, a pattern of snow was used to toggle the background and foreground so that the image was visually distorted. Masked CPT is more sensitive in detecting cognitive deficits. Subject responses were recorded automatically on a diskette using the CPT machine (Sunrise Systems, version 2.20, Pembroke, MA, USA).

Life event scale

The Recent Life Changes Questionnaire was developed and modified from the Schedule of Recent Experience, which was used to collect information concerning subjects’ recent life changes. In this study, we used the Taiwanese version life event scale (LES), which contains 39 items regarding representative life change events in the past 12 months, and the level of perceived stress brought about by recent life-changing events was recorded.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 12.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages, while continuous variables were expressed as the means ± standard deviations (SD) unless otherwise specified. Categorical variables were assessed using chi-square tests, while continuous variables were assessed using t tests. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed by using the χ2 goodness-of-fit test. Since plasma CRP level was not normally distributed, the distribution of CRP levels is shown as median, third quartile (Q3), and first quartile (Q1). Statistical analysis of plasma CRP levels was assessed by the Mann–Whitney U test. The level of significance was set at 0.05 for two-sided tests.

In the Mendelian randomization analysis, we first examined the gene-plasma CRP association in the control subjects by multiple linear regression analyses with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and smoking status. Each genotype was coded by the number of copies of the minor allele under the additive model and analyzed as a continuous variable beta coefficient value (BCRP/per allele), which indicated the per allele increase in plasma CRP level in general. Second, we examined the risk estimate for CRP gene-BD association under a logistic regression model and calculated the odds ratio (ORBD/per allele) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for each SNP. We obtained the odds ratio (OR) for BD risk per allele, ORBD/per allele. Finally, to calculate the causal effect of plasma CRP levels on BD risk, Mendelian randomization was estimated by using the following equation: ln ORBD/CRP = (ln ORBD/per allele)/BCRP/per allele. The standard error (SE) of the Mendelian randomization estimate was calculated using the Delta method where θ is the correlation between BCRP/per allele and BBD/per allele, and θ is assumed to be zero.[41-44]

Results

We recruited 191 BD patients and 112 control subjects. The demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1. Age, sex, and BMI were not significantly different between BD patients and controls (Table 1). The dose of VAP was ranged 500–1500 mg/day according to clinical manifestation, and mean of serum trough concentration of VPA was 71.80 ± 18.78 μg/mL in BD patients. The percentage of current smokers was not significantly different between BD patients and controls (19.9% vs. 15.3%, p = .506). The genotype frequencies of CRP SNPs in BD patients and controls are shown in Table S1, and none of these polymorphisms deviated significantly from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The genotype frequencies of SNPs in our subjects were not different from those of Han Chinese data from the 1000 Genomes Project. In addition, cognitive function was significantly different between BD patients and controls. Overall performance on the FTT and CPT was significantly worse for BD patients than for controls. Moreover, the total life event scale score was higher in BD patients than in controls (13.26 ± 10.75 vs 10.30 ± 9.14, p = .009) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of drug-naïve BD patients and control subjects.

Characteristics	BD patients(N = 191)	Controls(N = 112)	Comparison
	Mean ± SD	mean ± SD	t/χ2/Z	95% CI		p
				Lower	Upper
Age, years	32.24 ± 11.68	33.04 ± 11.64	0.58	−1.94	3.55	.565
Sex, female, n (%)	95 (50.3)	56 (50.5)	0.00	—	—	1.000
Smoking, n (%)	38 (19.9)	17 (15.3)	0.44	—	—	.506
YMRS scores	9.2 ± 4.0	0.1 ± 0.3	−11.42	4.3	6.0	<.001*
HAMD scores	19.4 ± 3.5	1.4 ± 1.5	−25.33	14.9	17.4	<.001*
BMI, kg/m2	23.06 ± 4.32	23.12 ± 3.94	0.12	−0.93	1.05	.908
CRPa, ng/mL (Q3, Q1)	1268.4 (2719.7, 482.6)	62.3 (185.1, 22.5)	−12.28	—	—	<.001*
Cognitive function b
FTT
Dominant hand	41.12 ± 9.42	48.16 ± 8.27	4.99	4.26	9.82	<0.001*
Nondominant hand	39.22 ± 8.65	45.09 ± 7.33	4.63	3.36	8.37	<0.001*
CPT
Unmasked	3.86 ± 1.00	4.56 ± 0.39	5.14	.43	0.97	<0.001*
Masked	3.49 ± 1.21	3.97 ± 0.83	2.21	.04	0.92	0.032*
Life event scale
Total score	13.26 ± 10.75	10.30 ± 9.14	−1.78	6.28	0.35	0.009*

BD: bipolar disorder; YMRS: Young Mania rating scale; HAMD: 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale; BMI: body mass index; CRP: C-reactive protein; FTT: finger tapping test; CPT: continuous performance test; CI: confidence interval. *p < .05.

aSince the plasma CRP level was not normally distributed, the distribution of CRP level is shown as median, third quartile (Q3), and first quartile (Q1). The statistical analysis of plasma CRP levels was assessed by the Mann–Whitney U test.

bAmong BD patients, 54 subjects finished cognitive function tests after receiving VPA.

Median plasma CRP levels were 1268.4 ng/mL and 62.3 ng/mL in BD patients and control subjects (p < .001), respectively (Table 1). After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, plasma CRP levels were significantly higher in BD patients than in controls (p < .001). Moreover, these differences remained significant after the stratification of CRP genotypes with Bonferroni’s correction (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Differences in plasma CRP levels between drug-naïve BD patients and controls. Between-group differences in plasma CRP levels were assessed by ANCOVA after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. (a) Plasma CRP levels in drug-naïve BD patients and controls. (b) To (e) Plasma CRP levels in drug-naïve BD patients and controls separately by genotype. *p < .05.

To investigate the causal effects of plasma CRP levels on BD risk, a Mendelian randomization analysis was performed. There were three steps in this analysis. First, to investigate the gene-plasma CRP association (per allele increase in plasma CRP level, BCRP/per allele, Table 2), we found that two SNPs of CRP had significant effects on plasma CRP levels in controls. The SNPs rs1205 and rs2794520 showed significant impacts on plasma CRP levels (Table 2). The results indicated that the genetic background of CRP indeed influenced the level of plasma CRP. Second, we performed logistic regression models to assess the risk estimate for the CRP gene-BD association (per allele OR for BD risk, ORBD/per allele, Table 2). No significant association between CRP SNPs and BD was found. Finally, Mendelian randomization was estimated using the following equation: ln ORBD/CRP = (ln ORBD/per allele)/BCRP/per allele, and no significant effect of CRP levels on BD risk was observed (Table 2). Figure S1 shows a graphical presentation of the results from the genetic approach of Mendelian randomization. Taken together, although the plasma CRP levels were significantly higher in BD patients than in controls, the causal effect of plasma CRP levels on the risk of BD and the frequencies of the CRP SNPs in BD was not statistically significant.

Table 2.

The estimates of CRP gene-plasma association, gene-BD association, and the causal effect of CRP on BD risk by Mendelian randomization analysis.

SNPs	Alleles	BCRP/per allele a (SE; p value)	ORBD/per allele (95% CI; p value)	ORBD/CRP (95% CI)
rs1800947	C>G	0.211(0.387; p= .587)	0.805(0.449–1.444; p= .467)	0.359(0.004, 35.919)
rs1130864	G>A	0.178(0.559; p= .750)	1.309(0.595–2.881; p= .503)	4.532(1.522 × 10−4, 1.350 × 105)
rs1205	T>C	0.522 (0.235; p= .028*)	1.079 (0.761–1.531; p= .668)	1.157 (0.586, 2.285)
rs2794520	T>C	0.532(0.237; p= .027*)	1.067(0.756–1.506; p= .712)	1.130(0.586, 2.180)

CRP: C-reactive protein; SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism; BD: bipolar disorder; CI: confidence interval; SE: standard error. *p < .05.

ap values were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and smoking status.

Furthermore, we investigated the association between the polymorphisms of CRP and treatment outcome, represented by cognitive function, in BD patients (Tables 3–5). The results showed that the genotypes of CRP rs1800947 were significantly associated with the FTT and CPT tests. BD patients with the CC genotype of CRP rs1800947 had better cognitive performance than G carriers (dominant hand FTT: 41.80 ± 8.57 vs 35.82 ± 10.56, p = .048; nondominant hand FTT: 40.13 ± 8.24 vs 34.03 ± 9.09, p = .032; masked CPT: 3.67 ± 1.05 vs 2.66 ± 1.18, p = .044). In addition, the genotypes of CRP rs1205 were significantly associated with performance on the FTT tests. BD patients with the CC genotypes of rs1205 and rs2794520 had better cognitive performance on the nondominant hand FTT than those with T carriers (p = .047). In addition, we examined whether the interactions of CRP polymorphisms and LES influenced cognitive performance in BD patients after receiving 12 weeks of VPA treatment. Figure 2 shows that there were significant interactions between polymorphisms of CRP and total scores of LES for masked CPT in BD patients (rs1800947, p = .048; rs1130864, p = .025; rs1205 (rs2794520), p = .030, respectively).

Table 3.

Cognitive function in different genotypes of rs1800947 in BD patients.

BD
Cognitive function	All	CC genotype (n = 42)	G carrier (n = 12) a	p
FTT
Dominant hand	41.12 ± 9.42	41.80 ± 8.57	35.82 ± 10.56	.048*
Nondominant hand	39.22 ± 8.65	40.13 ± 8.24	34.03 ± 9.09	.032*
CPT
Unmasked	3.86 ± 1.00	3.93 ± 0.99	3.46 ± 1.01	.154
Masked	3.49 ± 1.21	3.67 ± 1.05	2.66 ± 1.18	.044*

BD: bipolar disorder; FTT: finger tapping test; CPT: continuous performance test. *p < .05.

aOne BD patient carried GG genotype.

Figure 2.

Interaction effect of CRP polymorphisms and LES on cognitive performance in BD patients. Plots show the interaction effect of LES total scores and (a) CRP rs1800947, (b) CRP rs1130864, and (c) CRP rs1205 and CRP rs2794520 on (I) the FTT for the dominant hand, (II) the FTT for the nondominant hand, (III) unmasked CPT, and (IV) masked CPT among BD patients. There were significant interactions between polymorphisms of CRP and total scores of LES on masked CPT (rs1800947, p = .048; rs1130864, p = .025; rs1205 (rs2794520), p = .030). The frequencies of CRP rs1205 and rs2794520 were the same in cases of BD. Abbreviations: BD, bipolar disorder; LES, Life Events Scale.

Discussion

Our aims in the current study were to conduct a genetic approach in drug-naïve depressed BD patients to clarify the association between CRP and the risk of BD and to further investigate the polymorphisms of CRP and the stress of life event changes on treatment outcome (represented by cognitive function) in BD patients treated with VPA. Investigating causalities between CRP levels and BD is important for understanding the pathology of BD, since the current study showed that BD patients had higher plasma CRP levels than control subjects, as previous studies have reported.[1,22] In addition, CRP level was not significantly different between BD patients at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment (median plasma CRP level was 1268.4 ng/mL vs. 1170.0 ng/mL, p = .984). CRP level after 12 weeks of treatment was not correlated with improvement in YMRS scores or HAMD scores. A high level of CRP could be a biomarker of BD II itself or a differential biomarker between major depression and BD II depression, and also has shown in manic patients with BD I.

The causal effect of plasma CRP levels on BD risk and the frequencies of CRP SNPs in BD was not statistically significant, and thus, the causal effect could flow in the reverse direction. In addition, the results showed that the genotypes of CRP were significantly associated with cognitive performance in BD patients with VPA. BD patients with the CC genotype of CRP rs1800947 or the CC genotype of rs1205 had better cognitive performance than those with other carriers after 12 weeks of VPA treatment. Moreover, there were significant interaction effects of the polymorphisms of CRP and total life event scale scores on cognitive performance in BD patients treated with VPA. Taken together, our study not only demonstrated the clinical utility of the application of functional genetics in clarifying the mutual interactions between CRP and BD but also suggested an important role of CRP gene–environment interactions in the field of developing treatment strategies for BD.

According to the Mendelian randomization analysis, therefore, we suggested that BD might be caused by reverse causality (BD causes elevated plasma CRP levels). There were some possible contributors influencing the causal relationship. First, the reverse causality suggested that BD could cause elevated plasma CRP levels through the immune system via progressive neuropathological processes. In the CNS, alterations in the expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) produced by astrocytes, microglia, and neurons have been suggested as important factors involved in synaptic transmission, synaptic plasticity, neurodevelopment, neurotoxicity, and the regulation of neuronal survival in cases of BD.[46,47] The increased expression of TNF-α could shift this balance and play a role in cognitive impairment among chronic BD patients. In addition, TNF-α induced the central recruitment of circulating monocytes, which produced more proinflammatory cytokines and sustained the inflammatory status, even in cases of peripheral inflammation. Therefore, CRP, synthesized by hepatocytes in response to inflammatory processes, could be found at increased levels in mania/hypomania and depressive episodes and remained higher in euthymic patients than in control subjects.[1,21] Second, confounding factors, such as environmental factors, life event changes, and comorbidities, could directly affect plasma CRP levels or BD. Elevated plasma CRP levels were associated with shared risk factors for BD, such as smoking, obesity, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus.[1,50,51] In addition, elevated plasma CRP levels were also associated with medications for BD. Moreover, plasma CRP level could vary across mood states in BD patients,[1,21,22] and CRP concentrations are higher during mania than during depression and euthymia. Third, recent studies have suggested that the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis and CRP are involved in dysbiosis of the gut microbiome in psychiatric disease.[52,53] The HPA axis is a central system in response to stress, regulating stress homeostasis and influencing CRP synthesis. Altering the neuroendocrine system results in a change in gut microbiota composition, disturbance of intestinal barrier function, and activation of the immune system.[52,53] Proinflammatory status and low-grade inflammation in the dysfunctional intestinal mucosal barrier could also activate the HPA axis and further influence CNS function.[53,54] Considering these confounding factors, we carefully recruited BD patients who were drug-naïve, in a depressed stage, and at first diagnosis of BD to exclude these possible biases. Taken together, the mutual interactions between plasma CRP and BD indicated that the inflammatory system is involved in one of the complex mechanisms of mood disorder and suggests a potential therapeutic role.

Growing evidence has shown that CRP appears to be a peripheral biomarker that reflects peripheral and central inflammation in MDD patients,[55-57] although it is difficult to measure CRP levels in the CNS in clinical practice. Plasma CRP was significantly correlated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) CRP. Plasma CRP was also correlated with plasma and CSF inflammatory cytokines, including TNF and interleukin (IL)-β. In addition, plasma CRP and CSF inflammatory markers were significantly associated with depressive symptom severity in MDD patients.[56,57] Furthermore, a brain imaging study demonstrated that plasma CRP was not only highly predictive of depressive symptoms but also associated with reduced functional connectivity within a widely distributed network, such as the ventral striatum, parahippocampal gyrus/amygdala, and posterior cingulate cortex in patients with depression. These alterations were centralized in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex, representing an important role for the effects of inflammation on network function in the whole brain. Therefore, peripheral CRP could be an appropriate marker with clinical utility for identifying patients with mood disorders.

Furthermore, since immune dysfunction, such as elevated plasma CRP levels, has been strongly implicated in the pathophysiology of BD, targeting the immune system is a strategy for the treatment of bipolar disorder.[59,60] As such, numerous clinical trials have investigated the effects of anti-inflammatory agents in the treatment of BD.[60-62] Adjunctive anti-inflammatory agents have demonstrated antidepressant effects with N-acetylcysteine (NAC), pioglitazone, minocycline, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the acute phase of bipolar depression.[63-68] In contrast, some studies reported that adjunctive NAC, aspirin+NAC, or infliximab did not show significant efficacy when compared with placebo in cases of acute BD depression unless subgroup analysis was performed.[69-71] Adjunctive celecoxib and NAC showed potential antimanic effects,[61,72] while there are limited studies concerning euthymic stage patients. Overall, reports have shown that anti-inflammatory agents in the treatment of bipolar depression have moderate effects and good tolerance. Moreover, regardless of illness phase, previous studies also suggested that anti-inflammatory agents are likely most beneficial in patients with mood disorder when subgrouped by immune dysregulation or by childhood maltreatment.[59,71] Since low-dose memantine serves as an anti-inflammatory agent through the BDNF signaling pathway,[74,75] BD patients with high initial plasma CRP levels receiving memantine adjunct treatment have a reduced risk of inflammation and metabolic imbalance. Additionally, a report showed that the plasma CRP level could predict the differential responses to antidepressants, and clinical trials of tumor necrosis factor antagonists and omega-3 fatty acids demonstrated the role of the initial plasma CRP level in predicting individual treatment responses in patients with major depressive disorder.[77,78] Larger studies using samples stratified by inflammatory status are required in the future to examine the roles of inflammation and adjunctive immune modulating agents in the treatment outcome of BD. Taken together, plasma CRP has a role as a sensitive inflammatory marker, which could be linked not only to BD pathophysiology but also to the treatment outcome associated with BD.

Considering the stratification of the polymorphisms of the CRP gene, the results still showed that BD patients had higher plasma CRP levels than control subjects. Furthermore, the polymorphisms of the CRP gene were associated with plasma CRP levels in the controls in the current study, which was similar to previous reports.[79-83] However, the polymorphisms of CRP were not associated with plasma CRP levels in our BD patients, which might result from the elevated and relatively high CRP levels that might contribute to nonnormal distribution in BD. In addition, the frequencies of the CRP polymorphisms were not significantly different between BD patients and controls, and the frequencies in our subjects were comparable to those of Han Chinese data from the 1000 Genomes Project. This finding demonstrated that the subjects enrolled in this study were representative. Moreover, the polymorphisms of the CRP gene have been reported to be associated with glucose intolerance, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk in the general population.[81,84] Although a previous study also reported that the frequencies of the CRP polymorphisms were similar between the BD and control groups, the polymorphisms of CRP genetic diversity might contribute to the development of autoimmune comorbid disorders and rapid cycling, which are both representative of BD severity. Taken together, the results from the study suggest that although polymorphisms of CRP might not be associated with plasma CRP levels in BD, polymorphisms could be linked to treatment outcome in cases of BD.

Although the data were presented carefully, this study has certain limitations. The first limitation is the relatively small sample size of BD patients. Although the relatively small sample size may limit the interpretation of the results, the association between plasma CRP level and BD had a statistical power of 0.8. The second limitation is that the causality between plasma CRP levels and BD should be considered with caution given the potential biases and limitations of Mendelian randomization analyses, such as general health status, population stratification of genetic variations, and pleiotropy. In the current study, to decrease the bias and confounding factors, all BD patients were drug naïve and at their first diagnosis of BD. Additionally, the frequencies of the CRP polymorphisms were consistent with those presented in the Ensembl project (http://asia.ensembl.org) for participants of Asian ethnicity. The third limitation is that we only examined the cognitive function in BD patients after 12-weeks VPA treatment, since we tried to decrease the influence of mood swings on cognitive performance of BD patients in acute stage. Impaired cognitive function might be part of residual depressive symptoms, although previous reports have suggested that these cognitive impairments may be long-lasting even in stable euthymic BD patients.[8,87] Therefore, we cannot exclude that impaired cognitive function might be part of residual depressive symptoms, endophenotype of BD, or an overall mood stabilization due to the valproate treatment. The forth limitation is that we did not use any rating instrument to assess stress perception in BD patients before and after treatment, although stress could contribute to immune dysregulation. The fifth limitation is that we did not validate the mechanism of CRP in causing BD using in vivo or in vitro studies, although there were some studies suggested that targeting the immune system is a strategy for the treatment of BD.[59,60]

Conclusions

In summary, our study suggested that drug-naïve, depressed BD patients who were at their first diagnosis had higher plasma CRP levels than control subjects, although the causal relationship between CRP and BD risk was not significant in the genetic analysis of Mendelian randomization. Furthermore, our study suggested that not only the genotypes of CRP polymorphisms but also the interactions between the polymorphisms of CRP and LES had a significant influence on cognitive function in BD patients after receiving VPA treatment. Our study demonstrated the clinical utility of applying functional genetics in clarifying the mutual interactions between CRP and BD, which are involved in complex BD mechanisms. We also suggested that the polymorphisms of CRP and environmental factors play important roles in the field of developing treatment strategies for BD. Additional large studies are necessary to confirm the roles of CRP gene–environment interactions in treatment outcome for BD, especially in the context of cognitive function.

Click here for additional data file.

Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-iji-10.1177_03946320221084835 for Roles of C-reactive protein polymorphisms and life event changes on cognitive function in bipolar patients receiving valproate by Po See Chen, Li-Yi Tang and Hui Hua Chang in International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology

Table 4.

Cognitive function in different genotypes of rs1130864 in BD patients.

BD
Cognitive function	All	GG genotype (n=51)	A carrier (n=3)a	p
FTT
Dominant hand	41.12 ± 9.42	40.34 ± 9.22	42.60 ± 12.41	.686
Nondominant hand	39.22 ± 8.65	38.82 ± 8.50	38.00 ± 14.60	.876
CPT
Unmasked	3.86 ± 1.00	3.8 ± 1.01	4.30 ± 0.72	.405
Masked	3.49 ± 1.21	3.45 ± 1.14	4.02 ± 0.78	.503

BD: bipolar disorder; FTT: finger tapping test; CPT: continuous performance test.

aNo BD patients carried AA genotype.

Table 5.

Cognitive function in different genotypes of rs1205 and rs2794520 in BD patients.

BD
Cognitive function	All	TT genotype (n = 25)	CT genotype (n = 20)	CC genotype (n = 9)	p
FTT
Dominant hand	41.12 ± 9.42	39.80 ± 10.94	38.81 ± 8.07	46.00 ± 3.82	.138
Nondominant hand	39.22 ± 8.65	37.66 ± 8.86	37.25 ± 8.39	45.27 ± 6.72	.047*
CPT
Unmasked	3.86 ± 1.00	3.80 ± 0.99	3.69 ± 1.10	4.20 ± 0.79	.443
Masked	3.49 ± 1.21	3.40 ± 1.12	3.37 ± 1.39	3.85 ± 0.63	.647

The frequencies of CRP rs1205 and rs2794520 were the same in cases of BD.

BD: bipolar disorder; FTT: finger tapping test; CPT: continuous performance test. *p < .05.