| Literature DB >> 35377109 |
Wayne B Dyer1, Gabriela Simonova2,3,4, Sara Chiaretti2, Mahe Bouquet3, Rebecca Wellburn2, Silver Heinsar3, Carmen Ainola3, Karin Wildi3,5, Kei Sato3, Samantha Livingstone3, Jacky Y Suen3,4, David O Irving6,7, John-Paul Tung2,3,4,8, Gianluigi Li Bassi3,4,9,10, John F Fraser3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fluid resuscitation is the standard treatment to restore circulating blood volume and pressure after massive haemorrhage and shock. Packed red blood cells (PRBC) are transfused to restore haemoglobin levels. Restoration of microcirculatory flow and tissue oxygen delivery is critical for organ and patient survival, but these parameters are infrequently measured. Patient Blood Management is a multidisciplinary approach to manage and conserve a patient's own blood, directing treatment options based on broad clinical assessment beyond haemoglobin alone, for which tissue perfusion and oxygenation could be useful. Our aim was to assess utility of non-invasive tissue-specific measures to compare PRBC transfusion with novel crystalloid treatments for haemorrhagic shock.Entities:
Keywords: Haemodilution; Haemorrhagic shock; Microcirculation; Oxygen debt; Patient blood management; Tissue oxygen delivery; Transfusion thresholds
Year: 2022 PMID: 35377109 PMCID: PMC8980119 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-022-00439-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Fig. 1Experimental timeline and summary of assessments
Baseline characteristics and treatment variables, and baseline primary outcome measures
| Baselinea | Treatment groups: mean (SD) | Group comparisonc | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | 1-PlasmaLyte | 2-ICAS | 3-PRBC | ( | |
| Animals ( | 8 | 8 | 8 | – | |
| Weight (kg) | 51.5 (5.2) | 50.9 (7.7) | 52.3 (6.3) | 0.75 | |
| Haemorrhage time (min) | 68 (15) | 74 (16) | 78 (14) | 0.49 | |
| Total haemorrhage (mL)b | 1427 (177) | 1630 (358) | 1694 (328) | 0.067 | |
| Haemorrhage (%TBV) | 41.4 (5.2) | 46.8 (6.2) | 48.5 (9.5) | 0.145 | |
| Total resus volume (L) | 3.64 (1.63) | 4.07 (0.54) | 3.16 (0.89) | 0.28 | |
| Resus/haem volume ratio | 2.5 (0.9) | 2.6 (0.4) | 1.9 (0.5) | 0.117 | |
| Resus rate (mL/kg/h) | 17.5 (6.9) | 21.0 (3.3) | 15.2 (4.0) | 0.087 | |
| NorAd use per group | 4/8 | 4/8 | 3/8 | – | |
| NorAd, total dose (mcg/kg) | 0.0318 (0.0149) | 0.0228 (0.0134) | 0.0100 (0.0009) | 0.87 | |
| Other vasopressor use | Dopamine: 1/8 | Metaraminol: 1/8 | 0/8 | – | |
| MAP (mmHg) | 66–95 | 84 (9) | 84 (8) | 92 (23) | 0.50 |
| Cardiac index (L/min/m2) | 1.9–6.5 | 4.2 (1.6) | 3.1 (0.7) | 3.8 (0.6) | 0.144 |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 58–128 | 111 (30) | 94 (20) | 86 (18) | 0.048 |
| SVRI (dynes*s/cm5/m2) | 800–3200 | 1645 (789) | 2069 (436) | 1875 (403) | 0.137 |
| PaO2/FiO2 ratio | 229–543 | 338 (77) | 345 (95) | 425 (90) | 0.112 |
| Hb, post-adrenaline (g/L) | 94–14.8 | 112 (14) | 123 (16) | 125 (18) | 0.26 |
| SvO2 (%) | 57–85 | 71 (9) | 74 (8) | 72 (7) | 0.76 |
| Brain StO2 (%) | 51–88 | 76 (10) | 72 (8) | 67 (8) | 0.132 |
| Muscle StO2 (%) | 56–78 | 62 (10) | 69 (9) | 66 (6) | 0.27 |
| Arterial lactate (mM) | 0.4–1.9 | 1.7 (2.1) | 0.7 (0.2) | 1.2 (1.0) | 0.192 |
| Base excess (mM) | − 4.7 to + 5.7 | 1.8 (2.8) | 2.3 (2.5) | 0.6 (3.3) | 0.92 |
TBV total blood volume, NorAd noradrenaline, MAP mean arterial pressure, SVRI systemic vascular resistance index, Hb haemoglobin, StO regional tissue oxygen saturation, SvO mixed venous saturation
aBaseline range: 2.5–97.5th percentile
bTotal haemorrhage included 250 ml iatrogenic surgical and sampling loss
cANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis
Fig. 2Primary and secondary haemodynamic outcomes. A Time to treat analysis of composite haemodynamic target (MAP ≥ 65 mmHg and CI ≥ 2.5 L/min/m2). B Mean arterial pressure (MAP). C Vasopressor use and MAP during the final treatment hour. D Cardiac index. E Heart rate. F Systemic vascular resistance index. G P/F ratio; and (H) haemoglobin. Shaded areas represent levels outside the normal range, or treatment targets. Data shown as mean or geometric mean according to normality test, with 95% confidence intervals. Mixed model ANOVA with Tukey correction for multiple comparisons; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 3Primary and secondary tissue oxygen delivery outcomes. A Time to treat analysis of composite tissue oxygen delivery target (muscle StO2 ≥ 50% and arterial lactate ≤ 2 mM). B Regional tissue oxygen saturation-muscle. C Arterial lactate. D Venous oxygen saturation. E Regional tissue oxygen saturation-brain. F Arterial base excess. Shaded areas represent levels outside the normal range or treatment target. Data shown as mean or geometric mean according to normality test, with 95% confidence intervals. Mixed model ANOVA with Tukey correction for multiple comparisons; *p < 0.05
Fig. 4Invasive measures of oxygen tension, lactate concentration and microvascular blood flow in brain, kidney, liver and muscle. A Organ-specific oxygen tension (PtO2). B Organ-specific lactate concentration. C Organ-specific microvascular blood flow. Data shown as mean or geometric mean according to normality test, with 95% confidence intervals. Mixed model ANOVA with Tukey correction for multiple comparisons; *p < 0.05
Fig. 5Utility of non-invasive measures to estimate organ-specific outcomes. A Concurrent recovery of PtO2 and StO2 in brain. B Liver PtO2 recovered (> 75% baseline) before other tissues and muscle StO2. C Arterial lactate was associated with brain and kidney lactate but delayed liver and muscle lactate clearance (< 4 mM; baseline mean + SD). D Arterial lactate was associated with recovery in organ-specific lactate/pyruvate ratios (< 30). E Sublingual capillary flow (proportion perfused vessels; PPV) recovered similarly between treatment groups; (F) and an increase in sublingual capillary flow indicated that organ-specific capillary flow had improved (> 75% baseline). Data shown as mean or geometric mean according to normality test, with 95% confidence intervals. Mixed model ANOVA with Tukey correction for multiple comparisons; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p, 0.0001
Fig. 6Treatment effects on inflammation and organ function. A Serum magnesium. B 10 min ROTEM amplitude (A10) in FIBTEM. C Circulating neutrophil count. D Serum hyaluronan; inflammatory cytokines in plasma (E) IL-1β, (F) IL-6, (G) IL-8, and (H) IL-10. I Urinary output. J Proteinuria. K Serum cardiac troponin-I. L Serum creatine phosphokinase. M Serum aspartate aminotransferase. N Cardiac and renal tissue mitochondrial oxygen consumption (FCR: flux-controlled ratio), background vs. complex I and II. O Total mitochondrial electron transfer capacity; and (P) lung wet/dry ratios. Data shown as mean or geometric mean according to normality test, with 95% confidence intervals. Mixed model ANOVA with Tukey correction for multiple comparisons; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p, 0.0001