Bernard J DuBray1, Saed H Shawar2, Scott A Rega3, Kristin M Smith3, Kaylin M Centanni3, Kara Warmke3, Beatrice P Concepcion2, Gretchen C Edwards4, Heidi M Schaefer2, Irene D Feurer5, Rachel C Forbes1. 1. Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 2. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 3. Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 4. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Departments of Surgery and Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
Background: As the organ-shortage crisis continues to worsen, many patients in need of a kidney transplant have turned to social media to find a living donor. The effect of social media on living kidney donation is not known. The goal of this study is to investigate the influence of social media on those interested in donating a kidney. Methods: Self-referrals for living kidney donation from December 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, race, and relationship of individuals petitioned through social media (SM) were compared with those petitioned through verbal communication (VC). Data were analyzed using chi-squared tests, with z tests of column proportions, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 7817 individuals (53% SM, 36% VC, and 10% other) were self-referred for living kidney donation. The analysis sample included 6737 adults petitioned through SM (n=3999) or VC (n=2738). Half (n=3933) of the individuals reported an altruistic relationship, and 94% of these respondents were petitioned through SM. Although univariate analyses indicated that SM respondents were younger, more likely female, more likely White, and more likely to have directed altruistic intent than those petitioned through VC (all P<0.05), multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that only decreased age, female sex, and relationship were significantly related to likelihood of SM use (all P<0.001). Conclusions: The use of SM to petition living kidney donors is prevalent and accounts for a greater proportion of respondents compared with VC. SM respondents tend to be younger, female, and altruistic compared with VC. Directed altruistic interest in kidney donation is almost exclusively generated through SM.
Background: As the organ-shortage crisis continues to worsen, many patients in need of a kidney transplant have turned to social media to find a living donor. The effect of social media on living kidney donation is not known. The goal of this study is to investigate the influence of social media on those interested in donating a kidney. Methods: Self-referrals for living kidney donation from December 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, race, and relationship of individuals petitioned through social media (SM) were compared with those petitioned through verbal communication (VC). Data were analyzed using chi-squared tests, with z tests of column proportions, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 7817 individuals (53% SM, 36% VC, and 10% other) were self-referred for living kidney donation. The analysis sample included 6737 adults petitioned through SM (n=3999) or VC (n=2738). Half (n=3933) of the individuals reported an altruistic relationship, and 94% of these respondents were petitioned through SM. Although univariate analyses indicated that SM respondents were younger, more likely female, more likely White, and more likely to have directed altruistic intent than those petitioned through VC (all P<0.05), multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that only decreased age, female sex, and relationship were significantly related to likelihood of SM use (all P<0.001). Conclusions: The use of SM to petition living kidney donors is prevalent and accounts for a greater proportion of respondents compared with VC. SM respondents tend to be younger, female, and altruistic compared with VC. Directed altruistic interest in kidney donation is almost exclusively generated through SM.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: K Kumar; E A King; A D Muzaale; J M Konel; K A Bramstedt; A B Massie; D L Segev; A M Cameron Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: A M Cameron; A B Massie; C E Alexander; B Stewart; R A Montgomery; N R Benavides; G D Fleming; D L Segev Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Eric Treat; Eric K H Chow; John D Peipert; Amy Waterman; Lorna Kwan; Allan B Massie; Alvin G Thomas; Mary Grace Bowring; David Leeser; Stuart Flechner; Marc L Melcher; Sandip Kapur; Dorry L Segev; Jeffrey Veale Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 9.369