Literature DB >> 30062839

Understanding the sex disparity in living kidney donation.

G V Ramesh Prasad1.   

Abstract

Living donors are the preferred source of organs for kidney transplantation, which is the treatment modality of choice for end-stage kidney disease. Health care systems widely promote living kidney donation. However, women are consistently overrepresented among living donors. The reasons behind the sex-based disparity in living kidney donation remain poorly understood. Compared to women, men possess a greater amount of kidney function, and the higher deceased donation rate among men reflects their higher overall kidney quality. A plausible medical explanation for the sex-based disparity in living kidney donation includes an uncompromising emphasis on preserving donor health, with less emphasis placed on organ quality, which is the main criterion in deceased donor selection. On the other hand, consent to deceased donation is also greater in women, indicating their greater desire to donate even though fewer women actually become deceased donors. Therefore, nonmedical reasons for the sex disparity in living donation must be sought. Increased empathic distress or emotional memory; a greater sense of responsibility, urgency, and impulsiveness with increased reaction to empathy; a different body image; and a different social status may all contribute to greater living kidney donation in women. Economic inequity may be the singular explanation when personal worth links to economic worth. To better understand the sex disparity in living kidney donation, we need better data on the reasons behind both nondonation and donor rejection after evaluation in clinical practice. Nondirected living kidney donation provides unique opportunities to minimize factors such as emotional distress, empathy, and impulsiveness. More liberal acceptance criteria for donors with isolated medical abnormalities and testing legitimate donor reimbursement strategies based on actual income levels rather than a fixed amount can assist in both ascertaining the reasons behind the sex disparity in living kidney donation and increasing overall living kidney donation rates.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evaluation; health policy; philosophy of medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30062839     DOI: 10.1111/jep.13015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  4 in total

1.  Experiencing one's own body and body image in living kidney donors-A sociological and psychological study.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kowal; Mateusz Zatorski; Artur Kwiatkowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Impact of Social Media on Self-Referral Patterns for Living Kidney Donation.

Authors:  Bernard J DuBray; Saed H Shawar; Scott A Rega; Kristin M Smith; Kaylin M Centanni; Kara Warmke; Beatrice P Concepcion; Gretchen C Edwards; Heidi M Schaefer; Irene D Feurer; Rachel C Forbes
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-10-30

3.  Factors Associated with the Willingness to Become a Living Kidney Donor: A National Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Paulina Kurleto; Lucyna Tomaszek; Irena Milaniak; Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Country-specific sex disparities in living kidney donation.

Authors:  Amelie Kurnikowski; Simon Krenn; Michal J Lewandowski; Elisabeth Schwaiger; Allison Tong; Kitty J Jager; Juan Jesus Carrero; Manfred Hecking; Sebastian Hödlmoser
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.992

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.