| Literature DB >> 35371140 |
Xiaowei Guan1,2, Yunxiang Mao1,3, John W Stiller4, Shanshan Shu1,2, Ying Pang1,2, Weihua Qu1,2, Zehao Zhang1,2, Fugeng Tang1,2, Huijuan Qian1,2, Rui Chen1,2, Bin Sun1,2, Du Guoying1,2, Zhaolan Mo1,2, Fanna Kong1,2, Xianghai Tang1,2, Dongmei Wang1,2.
Abstract
Genetic reprogramming of differentiated cells is studied broadly in multicellular Viridiplantae as an adaptation to herbivory or damage; however, mechanisms underlying cell development and redifferentiation are largely unknown in red algae, their nearest multicellular relatives. Here we investgate cell reprogramming in the widely cultivated, edible seaweed Neopyropia yezoesis ("nori"), where vegetative cells in wounded blades differentiate and release as large numbers of asexual spores. Based upon physiological changes and transcriptomic dynamics after wound stress in N. yezoensis and its congener Neoporphyra haitanensis, another cultivar that does not differentiate spores after wounding, we propose a three-phase model of wound-induced spore development in N. yezoensis. In Phase I, propagation of ROS by RBOH and SOD elicites systematic transduction of the wound signal, while Ca2+ dependent signaling induces cell reprogramming. In Phase II, a TOR signaling pathway and regulation of cyclin and CDK genes result in cell divisions that spread inward from the wound edge. Once sporangia form, Phase III involves expression of proteins required for spore maturation and cell wall softening. Our analyses not only provide the first model for core molecular processes controlling cellular reprogramming in rhodophytes, but also have practical implications for achieving greater control over seeding in commercial nori farming.Entities:
Keywords: Neopyropia yezoensis; ROS; calcium signaling pathway; cell division; cell reprogramming; nori; spore-specific gene marker; wound-induced spores
Year: 2022 PMID: 35371140 PMCID: PMC8969420 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.840439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Morphological changes of cut fragments during the wound-induced spore formation and statistics of DEGs identified in the two Pyropia spices. (A) Cellular changes in cut fragments along the time course after wounding in N. yezoensis. Time refers to the duration (in hours and days) since the onset of wounding. (B) Cellular changes in cut fragments along the time course after wounding in N. haitanensis. (C) Calcofluor white staining of cell wall changes during the formation of sporangia and release of spores in N. yezoensis. The red arrow indicates a released spore without any cell wall. The yellow arrow indicates the remaining cell wall debris and interval matrix after spores released. (D) Calcofluor white staining of cell wall changes in N. haitanensis. (E) The variation in photosynthetic efficiency of cut fragments over time in N. haitanensis. Mean values of Fv/Fm were plotted with the vertical bars representing SD (n = 5 biological independent samples). (F) Histogram showing the number of up- and down-regulated genes at each time point compared to the previous time point in N. haitanensis.
FIGURE 2ROS-mediated systematic signaling in N. yezoensis thallus fragments in response to wound stress. (A) ROS staining of intact thalli and fragments 2 and 6 h after wounding. Upper panel images are N. yezoensis; lower N. haitanensis. Dark green backgrounds in each image are auto-fluorescence. Bars represent 50 μm in each panel. (B) Total ROS detected in excised fragments in the two species. Columns and vertical bars represent the average values and SD (n = 3). (C) Transcriptional variation of RBOH genes in Neopyropia after wounding. The log2 value of FPKM foldchange compared to the intact sample for each time point was used for plotting. The solid line and dashed line represent genes from N. yezoensis and N. haitanensis, respectively. The same line colors indicate the two genes are best reciprocal hits. (D) Transcriptional variation of SOD genes in Pyropia after wounding.
FIGURE 3Ca2+ signaling in the wound-induced spore formation in N. yezoensis. (A) Effects of 1.0 mM LaCl3 on boundary repair and sporangia formation, causing eventual cell death. Morphological changes in the same cut fragment tracked at 0, 1, 3, and 5 days after wounding. (B) Effect of 0.5 mM LaCl3 on the percentage of cut fragments able to release spores. Average percentages of spore-releasing fragments plotted over time in control and LaCl3-treated media; error bars represent the SD (n = 3, 30 fragments/replicate as described in “Materials and Methods” section). **P < 0.01. (C) The percentage of cut fragments releasing spores with different dosages of L-glutamate. The plot follows the description for (B). (D) Morphological changes in a cut fragment treated with 0.1 mM L-glutamate. (E) Effect of 0.1 mM of L-glutamate on spore release. Columns represent the ratio of released spores to original cells in corresponding fragment with the SD shown (n = 3, 30 fragments/replicate). (F) Transcriptional variation of N. yezoensis GLR genes and their N. haitanensis counterparts. The dendrogram was constructed by maximum-likelihood and plots for each gene were done as described in Figure 2C. (G) Transcriptional variation of N. yezoensis calmodulin genes and their N. haitanensis counterparts. The dendrogram and plots are as described in (F). (H) Heatmap showing the transcriptional variation of CDPK genes in N. yezoensis and N. haitanensis. The log2 value of FPKM foldchange compared to the intact sample at each time point (see “Materials and Methods” section) for individual genes are displayed, as indicated by the color bar. The three clusters of CDPK genes discussed in the text were generated by Hierarchical Clustering and are indicated by red squares on the nodes.
FIGURE 4Cell cycle progression during wound-induced spore formation. (A) S-phase cells stained by EdU in the cut fragments along the time course. Fluorescence at the edge of fragments on 3–5th days are remaining reagents. Bars represent 50 μm in each panel. (B) Transcriptional variations of DNA-replication related genes in N. yezoensis. The red line represents the mean values of log2 (foldchange) of all the related genes, and the bars indicate standard errors. (C) Same plot as 4C but for N. haitanensis. (D) Transcriptional variation of TOR genes in the two Pyropia species. (E) Cellular changes in a N. yezoensis thallus fragment treated with rapamycin. (F) Transcriptional variation of three cyclin genes in N. yezoensis. The dashed line in blue was the N. haitanensis ortholog of py02624. The plots in (D,F) were done as described in Figure 2C.
FIGURE 5Transcriptional variation of cellulase (A), alginate lyase (B), and expansin (C) genes in N. yezoensis and N. haitanensis after wounding. The plots are as described in Figure 2C.
FIGURE 6A proposed model of three phases in wound-induced cell fate reprogramming in N. yezoensis. Systematic signaling of ROS coupled with the Ca2+-dependent signaling triggers an initial response to wound stress in Phase I, including activation of CAM/CDPK for downstream transcriptional regulation and possible phytohormone-related regulation yet to be determined. The induced expression of mTOR functions as a master regulator in turning on cell cycle progression by regulating multiple cyclins and CDKs (Phase II). Once cell divisions complete, sporangia containing 2–4 pre-spores are formed. Proteins required for spore release and germination accumulate in Phase III.