Jiyoung Lee1,2, Lenwood S Heath3, Ruth Grene2, Song Li1,2. 1. 1Genetics, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA. 2. 3School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA. 3. 2Department of Computer Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Comparative transcriptome analysis is the comparison of expression patterns between homologous genes in different species. Since most molecular mechanistic studies in plants have been performed in model species, including Arabidopsis and rice, comparative transcriptome analysis is particularly important for functional annotation of genes in diverse plant species. Many biological processes, such as embryo development, are highly conserved between different plant species. The challenge is to establish one-to-one mapping of the developmental stages between two species. RESULTS: In this manuscript, we solve this problem by converting the gene expression patterns into co-expression networks and then apply network module finding algorithms to the cross-species co-expression network. We describe how such analyses are carried out using bash scripts for preliminary data processing followed by using the R programming language for module finding with a simulated annealing method. We also provide instructions on how to visualize the resulting co-expression networks across species. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a comprehensive pipeline from installing software and downloading raw transcriptome data to predicting homologous genes and finding orthologous co-expression networks. From the example provided, we demonstrate the application of our method to reveal functional conservation and divergence of genes in two plant species.
BACKGROUND: Comparative transcriptome analysis is the comparison of expression patterns between homologous genes in different species. Since most molecular mechanistic studies in plants have been performed in model species, including Arabidopsis and rice, comparative transcriptome analysis is particularly important for functional annotation of genes in diverse plant species. Many biological processes, such as embryo development, are highly conserved between different plant species. The challenge is to establish one-to-one mapping of the developmental stages between two species. RESULTS: In this manuscript, we solve this problem by converting the gene expression patterns into co-expression networks and then apply network module finding algorithms to the cross-species co-expression network. We describe how such analyses are carried out using bash scripts for preliminary data processing followed by using the R programming language for module finding with a simulated annealing method. We also provide instructions on how to visualize the resulting co-expression networks across species. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a comprehensive pipeline from installing software and downloading raw transcriptome data to predicting homologous genes and finding orthologous co-expression networks. From the example provided, we demonstrate the application of our method to reveal functional conservation and divergence of genes in two plant species.
Authors: A M Chaudhury; A Koltunow; T Payne; M Luo; M R Tucker; E S Dennis; W J Peacock Journal: Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol Date: 2001 Impact factor: 13.827
Authors: Melissa S Cline; Michael Smoot; Ethan Cerami; Allan Kuchinsky; Nerius Landys; Chris Workman; Rowan Christmas; Iliana Avila-Campilo; Michael Creech; Benjamin Gross; Kristina Hanspers; Ruth Isserlin; Ryan Kelley; Sarah Killcoyne; Samad Lotia; Steven Maere; John Morris; Keiichiro Ono; Vuk Pavlovic; Alexander R Pico; Aditya Vailaya; Peng-Liang Wang; Annette Adler; Bruce R Conklin; Leroy Hood; Martin Kuiper; Chris Sander; Ilya Schmulevich; Benno Schwikowski; Guy J Warner; Trey Ideker; Gary D Bader Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Joachim Kilian; Dion Whitehead; Jakub Horak; Dierk Wanke; Stefan Weinl; Oliver Batistic; Cecilia D'Angelo; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Jörg Kudla; Klaus Harter Journal: Plant J Date: 2007-03-21 Impact factor: 6.417
Authors: Debra L Fulton; Yvonne Y Li; Matthew R Laird; Benjamin G S Horsman; Fiona M Roche; Fiona S L Brinkman Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2006-05-28 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Lars Juhl Jensen; Philippe Julien; Michael Kuhn; Christian von Mering; Jean Muller; Tobias Doerks; Peer Bork Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Roman L Tatusov; Natalie D Fedorova; John D Jackson; Aviva R Jacobs; Boris Kiryutin; Eugene V Koonin; Dmitri M Krylov; Raja Mazumder; Sergei L Mekhedov; Anastasia N Nikolskaya; B Sridhar Rao; Sergei Smirnov; Alexander V Sverdlov; Sona Vasudevan; Yuri I Wolf; Jodie J Yin; Darren A Natale Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2003-09-11 Impact factor: 3.169