Tara I Chang1, Guo Wei2,3, Robert Boucher2, Holly Kramer4,5, Glenn M Chertow1, Alfred K Cheung2,6, Tom Greene3, Paul K Whelton7, Srinivasan Beddhu2,6. 1. Division of Nephrology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 2. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah. 3. Division of Biostatistics, Departments of Population Health Sciences and Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah. 4. Department of Public Health Sciences, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois. 5. Medical Service, Hines Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Hines, Illinois. 6. Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah. 7. Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Abstract
Background: We sought to determine whether intensive systolic BP (SBP) lowering was harmful in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) participants with CKD (eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and lower baseline diastolic BP (DBP). Methods: We related baseline DBP with the SPRINT primary composite end point (myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, or cardiovascular death) and all-cause death. We examined the effect of intensive SBP lowering on these outcomes across the range of baseline DBPs using Cox regression with treatment by baseline DBP interaction terms. Results: Among 2646 SPRINT participants with CKD, lower baseline DBP was associated with a higher adjusted hazard of the primary composite end point and all-cause death. For example, participants with baseline DBP of 61 mm Hg (mean baseline DBP in the lowest tertile) experienced a 37% (95% CI, 7% to 75%) higher hazard of the primary outcome relative to participants with baseline DBP of 75 mm Hg (mean baseline DBP for overall). The benefit of intensive SBP lowering was consistent across a range of baseline DBPs on rates of the primary composite end point (linear interaction P value =0.56) and all-cause death (linear interaction P value =0.20). Conclusions: Among SPRINT participants with baseline CKD, lower DBP was associated with higher rates of the primary composite end point and all-cause death. However, DBP did not seem to modify the benefit of intensive SBP lowering on the primary composite end point or all-cause death. Our results suggest that lower DBP should not necessarily impede more intensive SBP lowering in patients with mild to moderate CKD.
Background: We sought to determine whether intensive systolic BP (SBP) lowering was harmful in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) participants with CKD (eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and lower baseline diastolic BP (DBP). Methods: We related baseline DBP with the SPRINT primary composite end point (myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, or cardiovascular death) and all-cause death. We examined the effect of intensive SBP lowering on these outcomes across the range of baseline DBPs using Cox regression with treatment by baseline DBP interaction terms. Results: Among 2646 SPRINT participants with CKD, lower baseline DBP was associated with a higher adjusted hazard of the primary composite end point and all-cause death. For example, participants with baseline DBP of 61 mm Hg (mean baseline DBP in the lowest tertile) experienced a 37% (95% CI, 7% to 75%) higher hazard of the primary outcome relative to participants with baseline DBP of 75 mm Hg (mean baseline DBP for overall). The benefit of intensive SBP lowering was consistent across a range of baseline DBPs on rates of the primary composite end point (linear interaction P value =0.56) and all-cause death (linear interaction P value =0.20). Conclusions: Among SPRINT participants with baseline CKD, lower DBP was associated with higher rates of the primary composite end point and all-cause death. However, DBP did not seem to modify the benefit of intensive SBP lowering on the primary composite end point or all-cause death. Our results suggest that lower DBP should not necessarily impede more intensive SBP lowering in patients with mild to moderate CKD.
Authors: Athanase D Protogerou; Michel E Safar; Pierre Iaria; Hélène Safar; Katia Le Dudal; Jan Filipovsky; Olivier Henry; Pierre Ducimetière; Jacques Blacher Journal: Hypertension Date: 2007-05-21 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Walter T Ambrosius; Kaycee M Sink; Capri G Foy; Dan R Berlowitz; Alfred K Cheung; William C Cushman; Lawrence J Fine; David C Goff; Karen C Johnson; Anthony A Killeen; Cora E Lewis; Suzanne Oparil; David M Reboussin; Michael V Rocco; Joni K Snyder; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Emmanuelle Vidal-Petiot; Ian Ford; Nicola Greenlaw; Roberto Ferrari; Kim M Fox; Jean-Claude Tardif; Michal Tendera; Luigi Tavazzi; Deepak L Bhatt; Philippe Gabriel Steg Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Franz H Messerli; Giuseppe Mancia; C Richard Conti; Ann C Hewkin; Stuart Kupfer; Annette Champion; Rainer Kolloch; Athanase Benetos; Carl J Pepine Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-06-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sripal Bangalore; Franz H Messerli; Chuan-Chuan Wun; Andrea L Zuckerman; David DeMicco; John B Kostis; John C LaRosa Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sanaz Sedaghat; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Ewout J Hoorn; Andre G Uitterlinden; Albert Hofman; M Arfan Ikram; Oscar H Franco; Abbas Dehghan Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Nathan K Itoga; Daniel S Tawfik; Charles K Lee; Satoshi Maruyama; Nicholas J Leeper; Tara I Chang Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Karen C Johnson; Paul K Whelton; William C Cushman; Jeffrey A Cutler; Gregory W Evans; Joni K Snyder; Walter T Ambrosius; Srinivasan Beddhu; Alfred K Cheung; Lawrence J Fine; Cora E Lewis; Mahboob Rahman; David M Reboussin; Michael V Rocco; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright Journal: Hypertension Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 10.190