Adeline Dorough1, Julia H Narendra1, Caroline Wilkie2, Akhil Hegde1, Kawan Swain1, Emily H Chang1, Terence Oliver3, Jennifer E Flythe1,4. 1. University of North Carolina Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2. Punta Gorda, Florida. 3. Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 4. Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
Background: Initiating hemodialysis via an arteriovenous (AV) access is considered best practice for most patients. Despite the well-recognized advantages of AV access, 80% of US patients start hemodialysis with a catheter. Limited patient knowledge about vascular access, among other factors, may play a role in this high rate. We used iterative stakeholder input to develop novel, mixed media vascular access education materials and evaluated their preliminary acceptability. Methods: We conducted preliminary focus groups and interviews with key stakeholders to assess patient vascular access understanding and elicit perspectives on existing education materials. We then used stakeholder input to inform initial development and iterative updates to the content and design of an animated video and complementary brochure. Video development (scripting, storyboarding, animation) was guided by an evidence-based framework and two health behavior change models. We assessed acceptability of the completed materials with patients and medical providers/personnel via interviews. Results: Overall, 105 stakeholders participated in education materials development and review (80 patients/care partners, 25 medical providers/personnel). Preliminary qualitative work included 52 patients/care partners and 16 providers/personnel; video development included 28 patients/care partners and nine providers/personnel. The video script, storyboards, and animation underwent 14, four, and nine stakeholder-guided iterations, respectively. Responsive changes included aesthetic modifications, technical updates, and content additions (e.g., HD circuit, access self-monitoring, enhanced patient testimonials). The final 18-minute video and complementary brochure define vascular access types, describe care processes, outline potential complications, and address common patient concerns. Interviews with 28 patients/care partners and nine providers/personnel from diverse geographic regions revealed preliminary acceptability of, and enthusiasm for, the materials by patients and providers. Conclusions: In collaboration with key stakeholders, we developed mixed media vascular access education materials that were well-received by patients and providers. Preliminary findings suggest that the materials are promising to improve vascular access understanding among patients.
Background: Initiating hemodialysis via an arteriovenous (AV) access is considered best practice for most patients. Despite the well-recognized advantages of AV access, 80% of US patients start hemodialysis with a catheter. Limited patient knowledge about vascular access, among other factors, may play a role in this high rate. We used iterative stakeholder input to develop novel, mixed media vascular access education materials and evaluated their preliminary acceptability. Methods: We conducted preliminary focus groups and interviews with key stakeholders to assess patient vascular access understanding and elicit perspectives on existing education materials. We then used stakeholder input to inform initial development and iterative updates to the content and design of an animated video and complementary brochure. Video development (scripting, storyboarding, animation) was guided by an evidence-based framework and two health behavior change models. We assessed acceptability of the completed materials with patients and medical providers/personnel via interviews. Results: Overall, 105 stakeholders participated in education materials development and review (80 patients/care partners, 25 medical providers/personnel). Preliminary qualitative work included 52 patients/care partners and 16 providers/personnel; video development included 28 patients/care partners and nine providers/personnel. The video script, storyboards, and animation underwent 14, four, and nine stakeholder-guided iterations, respectively. Responsive changes included aesthetic modifications, technical updates, and content additions (e.g., HD circuit, access self-monitoring, enhanced patient testimonials). The final 18-minute video and complementary brochure define vascular access types, describe care processes, outline potential complications, and address common patient concerns. Interviews with 28 patients/care partners and nine providers/personnel from diverse geographic regions revealed preliminary acceptability of, and enthusiasm for, the materials by patients and providers. Conclusions: In collaboration with key stakeholders, we developed mixed media vascular access education materials that were well-received by patients and providers. Preliminary findings suggest that the materials are promising to improve vascular access understanding among patients.
Authors: Kerri L Cavanaugh; Rebecca L Wingard; Raymond M Hakim; Svetlana Eden; Ayumi Shintani; Kenneth A Wallston; Mary Margaret Huizinga; Tom A Elasy; Russell L Rothman; T Alp Ikizler Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-07-29 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Jordan R Casey; Camilla S Hanson; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Jonathan C Craig; Suetonia Palmer; Giovanni F M Strippoli; Allison Tong Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-08-10 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: José L Calderón; Magda Shaheen; Ron D Hays; Erik S Fleming; Keith C Norris; Richard S Baker Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Paul N Bennett; Jennifer St Clair Russell; Jug Atwal; Lashone Brown; Brigitte Schiller Journal: Semin Dial Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Pietro Ravani; Brenda W Gillespie; Robert Ross Quinn; Jennifer MacRae; Braden Manns; David Mendelssohn; Marcello Tonelli; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Matthew James; Neesh Pannu; Bruce M Robinson; Xin Zhang; Ronald Pisoni Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Dominic M Taylor; Simon D S Fraser; J Andrew Bradley; Clare Bradley; Heather Draper; Wendy Metcalfe; Gabriel C Oniscu; Charles R V Tomson; Rommel Ravanan; Paul J Roderick Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 8.237