| Literature DB >> 35368327 |
Mohamed N Al-Yahya'ei1,2,3,4, Janusz Błaszkowski5, Hamood Al-Hashmi2, Khaled Al-Farsi6, Ismail Al-Rashdi6, Annette Patzelt6, Thomas Boller1, Andres Wiemken1, Sarah Symanczik1,7.
Abstract
The vegetation in the Arabian Peninsula experiences drought, heat, soil salinity, and low fertility, mainly due to low phosphorus (P) availability. The beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is a key factor supporting plant growth under such environmental conditions. Therefore, AMF strains isolated from these soils might be useful as biotechnological tools for agriculture and revegetation practices in the region. Here we present a pioneering program to isolate, identify, and apply AMF isolated from rhizosphere soils of agricultural and natural habitats, namely date palm plantations and five native desert plants, respectively in the Southern Arabian Peninsula. We established taxonomically unique AMF species as single-spore cultures as part of an expanding collection of AMF strains adapted to arid ecosystems. Preliminary experiments were conducted to evaluate the abilities of these AMF strains to promote seedling growth of a main crop Phoenix dactylifera L. and a common plant Prosopis cineraria L. (Druce) in the Arabian Peninsula. The results showed that inoculation with certain AMF species enhanced the growth of both plants, highlighting the potential of these fungi as part of sustainable land use practices in this region.Entities:
Keywords: Date palm; Desert ecosystem; Mycorrhizal symbiosis; Native plants; Oman
Year: 2021 PMID: 35368327 PMCID: PMC8933382 DOI: 10.1007/s13199-021-00824-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Symbiosis ISSN: 0334-5114 Impact factor: 2.268
Number of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) single-spore-derived cultures in relation to their original host plants and the host plants’ habitat
| AMF species | Associated plant species | Habitat | Number of AMF cultures |
|---|---|---|---|
Inter-plant area | Undisturbed habitat | 1 6 8 8 | |
Inter-plant area | Undisturbed habitat | 1 1 2 | |
Undisturbed habitat Traditional date palm plantation | 3 3 | ||
Inter-plant area | Undisturbed habitat Undisturbed habitat Undisturbed habitat Undisturbed habitat Sand dunes Undisturbed habitat Modern date palm plantation Traditional date palm plantation | 9 16 4 3 3 4 1 3 | |
| Undisturbed habitat | 3 2 | ||
| Inter-plant area | Undisturbed habitat | 2 | |
| Traditional date palm plantation | 4 | ||
| Traditional date palm plantation | 3 | ||
Germination of seeds and survival of seedlings of Prosopis cineraria under different control and inoculation treatments
| Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal treatment | Initial seeds treatment−1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | % | Number | % | ||
| Control 1 | 40 | 7 | 18 | 7 | 100 |
| Control 2 | 40 | 12 | 30 | 8 | 67 |
| Control 3 | 40 | 13 | 33 | 7 | 54 |
| Control 4 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 6 | 60 |
| 8 | 5 | 63 | 5 | 100 | |
| 8 | 5 | 63 | 5 | 100 | |
| 8 | 5 | 63 | 5 | 100 | |
| 8 | 5 | 63 | 5 | 100 | |
| 8 | 5 | 63 | 5 | 100 | |
| 8 | 4 | 50 | 4 | 100 | |
| 8 | 7 | 88 | 7 | 100 | |
| Consortium 1 | 8 | 6 | 75 | 6 | 100 |
| Consortium 2 | 8 | 3 | 38 | 3 | 100 |
| Consortium 3 | 8 | 5 | 63 | 5 | 100 |
| Consortium 4 | 8 | 4 | 50 | 4 | 100 |
Consortium 1 (P. simplex strain C49 and C56), consortium 2 (C. drummondii and De. omaniana), consortium 3 (S. africanum and De. omaniana), consortium 4 (P. simplex strain C49, C. drummondii, S. africanum, and De. omaniana), control 1 (microbial wash), control 2 (autoclaved inoculum carrier), control 3 (microbial wash and autoclaved inoculum carrier), control 4 (no amendments)
Fig. 1Phylogenetic positions and morphology of the eight arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) species recovered from the Arabian Peninsula. The simplified phylogenetic tree was inferred from the partial LSU rDNA region (628 dataset characters), and shows the positions of the isolated AMF species (shown in colored boldface). An image of each of the AMF species is associated with its phylogenetic position. Sequences were aligned in PAUP*4b10 (Swofford 2001) to other sequences from GenBank of species within the same genera. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using maximum likelihood criteria as implemented in PAUP*
Fig. 2Effect of inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on plant growth; (a) date palms grown as non-mycorrhizal control (left) and as mycorrhizal plants, inoculated with Diversispora aurantia (right); (b) Prosopis cineraria grown as non-mycorrhizal control (left) and as mycorrhizal plants, inoculated with Septoglomus africanum (right)
Fig. 3Impact of inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) species on (a) total leaf length and (b) the number of leaves of date palm seedlings. The consortium included all five AMF species: Diversispora aurantia, Septoglomus africanum, Claroideoglomus drummondii, Desertispora omaniana, and Pervetustus simplex. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s honest significant difference test (P ≤ 0.05). Data represent means ± standard error (n = 4–5)
Fig. 4Impact of inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal species on the height of Prosopis cineraria seedlings 3 months after sowing compared with the growth of non-mycorrhizal controls: microbial wash (control 1), autoclaved inoculum carrier (control 2), microbial wash and autoclaved inoculum carrier (control 3), and negative control (control 4). In addition to inoculation with single AMF species, four consortia were used as inocula: consortium 1 (Pervetustus simplex strain C49 and C56), consortium 2 (Claroideoglomus drummondii and Desertispora omaniana), consortium 3 (Septoglomus africanum and De. omaniana), and consortium 4 (P. simplex strain C49, C. drummondii; S. africanum, and De. omaniana). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s honest significant difference test (P ≤ 0.05). Data represent means + SE (n = 3–13)