| Literature DB >> 20571833 |
Mohamed N Al-Yahya'ei1, Fritz Oehl, Marta Vallino, Erica Lumini, Dirk Redecker, Andres Wiemken, Paola Bonfante.
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to shed light on the previously unknown arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities in Southern Arabia. We explored AMF communities in twoEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20571833 PMCID: PMC3058386 DOI: 10.1007/s00572-010-0323-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycorrhiza ISSN: 0940-6360 Impact factor: 3.387
Fig. 1Simplified map of Southern Arabia showing main geographical features of the area (modified from Preusser et al. 2002) including the sampling sites. The four sites are an oasis (filled triangle), an experimental station (empty triangle), an undisturbed habitat (filled circle), and sand dunes (empty circle)
Fig. 2Plants studied in the different habitats of Southern Arabia: a date palm (Phoenix dactylifera), b P. erioptera, c Z. hamiense, d S. persica, e P. cineraria, and f H. kotschyi
Soils chemical and physical properties in the four study habitats
| Pa (mg kg−1) | % N | pH | % Organic matter | % Sand | % Silt | % Clay | Soil texture | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2O | KCl | ||||||||
| Oasis | 71 | 0.18 | 8.4 | 7.9 | 3.7 | 67.2 | 24.8 | 8.1 | Sandy loam |
| Exp. station | 93 | 0.1 | 8.5 | 7.9 | 2.6 | 60.5 | 33.6 | 5.9 | Sandy loam |
| Undisturbed habitat | 41.4 | <0.1 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 1.5 | 70.7 | 25.4 | 4.3 | Sandy loam |
| Sand dunes | 22.6 | <0.1 | 9.1 | 8.5 | 0.45 | 90.7 | 9.3 | 0 | Sand |
aSodium bicarbonate-soluble P, analyzed using the method given by Chapman and Pratt (1961)
AMF species and their distribution among the different habitats and plant species studied
| Oasis | Exp. station | Undisturbed habitat | Sand dunes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date palm | Date palm |
|
|
|
| Inter-plant |
| |
|
| A, B, C, D | A, B, C, D | ||||||
|
| a, b, c, d | a, b, d | ||||||
|
| a, b, d | a, b, c, d | ||||||
|
| a, b, c | a | ||||||
|
| b | |||||||
|
| a, b, c, d | |||||||
|
| a, c | |||||||
|
| a | |||||||
|
| b | |||||||
|
| ca | |||||||
|
| ba | |||||||
|
| a (rare), da | a (rare), ca | da | |||||
|
| aa, ba, ca | a, B, c, d | d (rare) | |||||
| ca, da | ||||||||
|
| a, b, c, d | a, b, c, d | a, b, c, d | a, b, c, d | b, c, d | a, b, c, d, | A, b, d | ca |
| aa, ba, da | aa, ca | aa, ba, ca, da | aa | |||||
|
| a, b, c, d | b, c, d | a, b, c, d | c, d | c, d | a, b, c, d | a, c, d | |
|
| aa, ba, ca, da | ba, ca, da | aa, ba, da | aa, ba, ca, da | b | A, b, D, | Aa, ba, ca, da | aa, ba, ca |
| aa, ba, ca, da | aa, a, ca, da | |||||||
|
| c (rare) | d (rare) | a, b, d | d | c | a, d | ||
|
| aa, da | a, b | ||||||
|
| d | b, c, d | a, b | a | D | |||
|
| a, b, c, d | a, b, c, d | c, d | a, b, c, d | ||||
|
| c | |||||||
|
| b | |||||||
|
| c (rare) | |||||||
|
| aa, ba | aa | ||||||
|
| aa | ba | ||||||
Four replicates were analyzed (a, b, c, d) per plant. Upper case letters show species dominating the spore populations in the corresponding replicate field sample. The spores of Glomus sp.OMA6, Scutellospora sp. OMA10, Glomus sp. OMA2, Glomus sp. OMA3, Glomus sp. OMA9, Glomus sp. OMA5, Glomus sp. OMA7, and Glomus sp. OMA8 (Glomus sp. MEX1; Bashan et al. 2007) resembled spores of Glomus liquidambaris, Scutellospora aurigloba, Glomus versiforme, Glomus invermaium, Glomus glomerulatum, Glomus multicaule, Glomus tortuosum, and Glomus rubiforme, respectively; Glomus sp. OMA3, Glomus sp. OMA5, Glomus sp. OMA8, and Glomus sp. OMA9 are undescribed species; others have not yet been clearly attributable to resembling known species. R. fulgida and R. gregaria are the former Scutellospora fulgida and Scutellospora gregaria, respectively (Oehl et al. 2008)
aIndicates AMF species found in the respective trap cultures
Fig. 3Dendrogram of cluster analysis based on the similarity of AMF morphospecies community composition across the host plants in all studied habitats. Two main clades were formed suggesting that AMF communities associated with date palm in the two plantations have different composition than that of vegetation in the undisturbed habitat (inter-plant area, S. persica, P. cineraria, and Z. hamiense), the disturbed area of the experimental station (P. erioptera), and the sand dunes (H. kotschyi). The group average clustering method and the squared Euclidean distance metric were used
Fig. 4Comparison of the effect of plant species in different study habitats on a AMF spore abundance in the field, b AMF species richness in the field and the trap cultures, and c the infection potential. Values are reported as means (±SD). Non-significant differences between the means are indicated by similar letters above their error bars
Fig. 5The relationship between a the infection potential and field spore abundance (r = 0.676, P = 0.0001) and b the infection potential and species richness (r = 0.729, P = 0.0001)
Fig. 6Phylogenetic tree of sequences obtained in this study from the date palms in the oasis plantation (OA) in 2006 and the experimental station (ES) in 2004 and 2006 and sequences from public databases. Sequences obtained in the present study are shown in boldface and are labeled with the database accession number (e.g., GQ406077), the plantation (e.g., oasis OA), the root sample replicate (e.g., 1), RFLP pattern (e.g., A), and the sampling year. The tree was obtained by neighbor-joining analysis of 308 characters from the 18S rDNA. The numbers above the branches are neighbor-joining bootstrap values from 1,000 replications. The tree was rooted using Paraglomus occultum. Note: S. castanea, S. gregaria, and S. fulgida were all recently renamed R. castanea, R. gregaria, and R. fulgida, respectively (Oehl et al. 2008); Kuklospora colombiana is the former Entrophospora colombiana (Sieverding and Oehl 2006); Ambispora appendicula is the former Archaeospora leptoticha (Spain et al. 2006; Walker 2008)