Literature DB >> 24826999

The inherence heuristic: an intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism.

Andrei Cimpian1, Erika Salomon2.   

Abstract

We propose that human reasoning relies on an inherence heuristic, an implicit cognitive process that leads people to explain observed patterns (e.g., girls wear pink) predominantly in terms of the inherent features of their constituents (e.g., pink is a delicate color). We then demonstrate how this proposed heuristic can provide a unified account for a broad set of findings spanning areas of research that might at first appear unrelated (e.g., system justification, nominal realism, is-ought errors in moral reasoning). By revealing the deep commonalities among the diverse phenomena that fall under its scope, our account is able to generate new insights into these phenomena, as well as new empirical predictions. A second main goal of this article, aside from introducing the inherence heuristic, is to articulate the proposal that the heuristic serves as a foundation for the development of psychological essentialism. More specifically, we propose that essentialism - which is the common belief that natural and social categories are underlain by hidden, causally powerful essences - emerges over the first few years of life as an elaboration of the earlier, and more open-ended, intuitions supplied by the inherence heuristic. In the final part of the report, we distinguish our proposal from competing accounts (e.g., Strevens's K-laws) and clarify the relationship between the inherence heuristic and related cognitive tendencies (e.g., the correspondence bias). In sum, this article illuminates a basic cognitive process that emerges early in life and is likely to have profound effects on many aspects of human psychology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24826999     DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X13002197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  19 in total

1.  Children judge others based on their food choices.

Authors:  Jasmine M DeJesus; Emily Gerdin; Kathleen R Sullivan; Katherine D Kinzler
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-12-01

2.  Individual differences in children's and parents' generic language.

Authors:  Susan A Gelman; Elizabeth A Ware; Felicia Kleinberg; Erika M Manczak; Sarah M Stilwell
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-11-22

3.  How language shapes the cultural inheritance of categories.

Authors:  Susan A Gelman; Steven O Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Generating explanations via analogical comparison.

Authors:  Christian Hoyos; Dedre Gentner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

Review 5.  The scope of formal explanation.

Authors:  Sandeep Prasada
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

Review 6.  The development and developmental consequences of social essentialism.

Authors:  Marjorie Rhodes; Tara M Mandalaywala
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-03-08

7.  Memory accessibility shapes explanation: Testing key claims of the inherence heuristic account.

Authors:  Larisa J Hussak; Andrei Cimpian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

8.  Evaluating everyday explanations.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Zemla; Steven Sloman; Christos Bechlivanidis; David A Lagnado
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

9.  Generics designate kinds but not always essences.

Authors:  Alexander Noyes; Frank C Keil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Advancing Developmental Science via Unmoderated Remote Research with Children.

Authors:  Marjorie Rhodes; Michael T Rizzo; Emily Foster-Hanson; Kelsey Moty; Rachel A Leshin; Michelle Wang; Josie Benitez; John Daryl Ocampo
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2020-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.