Ka-Yuet Liu1, Julien O Teitler2, Sivananda Rajananda3, Valentina Chegwin2, Peter S Bearman4, Thomas Hegyi5, Nancy E Reichman6. 1. Department of Sociology, College of Social Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; California Center for Population Research, College of Social Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; RIKEN Center for Brain Science (CBS), Wako, Japan. Electronic address: kayuet.liu@riken.jp. 2. School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, New York. 3. California Center for Population Research, College of Social Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 4. Department of Sociology, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey; Child Health Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cesarean section and induced deliveries have increased substantially in the U.S., coinciding with increases in autism spectrum disorder. Studies have documented associations between cesarean section deliveries and autism spectrum disorder but have not comprehensively accounted for medical risks. This study evaluates the extent to which cesarean section and induced deliveries are associated with autism spectrum disorder in low-risk births. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, California's birth records (1992-2012) were linked to hospital discharge records to identify low-risk births using a stringent algorithm based on Joint Commission guidelines. Autism spectrum disorder status was based on California Department of Developmental Service data. Logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between autism spectrum disorder and induced vaginal deliveries, cesarean section deliveries not following induction, and cesarean section deliveries following induction, with noninduced vaginal deliveries as the reference category. RESULTS: A total of 1,488,425 low-risk births took place in California from 1992 to 2012. The adjusted odds of autism spectrum disorder were 7% higher for induced vaginal deliveries (AOR=1.07, 95% CI=1.01, 1.14), 26% higher for cesarean section deliveries not following induction (AOR=1.26, 95% CI=1.19, 1.33), and 31% higher for cesarean section deliveries following induction (AOR=1.31, 95% CI=1.18, 1.45) than for noninduced vaginal deliveries. Lower gestational age and neonatal morbidities did not appear to be important underlying pathways. The associations were insensitive to alternative model specifications and across subpopulations. These results suggest that, in low-risk pregnancies, up to 10% of autism spectrum disorder cases are potentially preventable by avoiding cesarean section deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for medical risks, elective deliveries-particularly cesarean section deliveries-were associated with a substantially increased risk of autism spectrum disorder.
INTRODUCTION: Cesarean section and induced deliveries have increased substantially in the U.S., coinciding with increases in autism spectrum disorder. Studies have documented associations between cesarean section deliveries and autism spectrum disorder but have not comprehensively accounted for medical risks. This study evaluates the extent to which cesarean section and induced deliveries are associated with autism spectrum disorder in low-risk births. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, California's birth records (1992-2012) were linked to hospital discharge records to identify low-risk births using a stringent algorithm based on Joint Commission guidelines. Autism spectrum disorder status was based on California Department of Developmental Service data. Logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between autism spectrum disorder and induced vaginal deliveries, cesarean section deliveries not following induction, and cesarean section deliveries following induction, with noninduced vaginal deliveries as the reference category. RESULTS: A total of 1,488,425 low-risk births took place in California from 1992 to 2012. The adjusted odds of autism spectrum disorder were 7% higher for induced vaginal deliveries (AOR=1.07, 95% CI=1.01, 1.14), 26% higher for cesarean section deliveries not following induction (AOR=1.26, 95% CI=1.19, 1.33), and 31% higher for cesarean section deliveries following induction (AOR=1.31, 95% CI=1.18, 1.45) than for noninduced vaginal deliveries. Lower gestational age and neonatal morbidities did not appear to be important underlying pathways. The associations were insensitive to alternative model specifications and across subpopulations. These results suggest that, in low-risk pregnancies, up to 10% of autism spectrum disorder cases are potentially preventable by avoiding cesarean section deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for medical risks, elective deliveries-particularly cesarean section deliveries-were associated with a substantially increased risk of autism spectrum disorder.
Authors: Steven L Clark; Janet A Meyers; Celeste G Milton; Donna R Frye; Stephen Horner; Allison Baker; Jonathan B Perlin Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Meghan B Azad; Theodore Konya; Heather Maughan; David S Guttman; Catherine J Field; Radha S Chari; Malcolm R Sears; Allan B Becker; James A Scott; Anita L Kozyrskyj Journal: CMAJ Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Tianyang Zhang; Anna Sidorchuk; Laura Sevilla-Cermeño; Alba Vilaplana-Pérez; Zheng Chang; Henrik Larsson; David Mataix-Cols; Lorena Fernández de la Cruz Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-08-02
Authors: Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Chunyuan Qiu; Jane C Lin; Jiaxiao M Shi; Ting Chow; Vimal N Desai; Vu T Nguyen; Robert J Riewerts; R Klara Feldman; Scott Segal; Anny H Xiang Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 26.796
Authors: Matthew J Maenner; Kelly A Shaw; Jon Baio; Anita Washington; Mary Patrick; Monica DiRienzo; Deborah L Christensen; Lisa D Wiggins; Sydney Pettygrove; Jennifer G Andrews; Maya Lopez; Allison Hudson; Thaer Baroud; Yvette Schwenk; Tiffany White; Cordelia Robinson Rosenberg; Li-Ching Lee; Rebecca A Harrington; Margaret Huston; Amy Hewitt; Amy Esler; Jennifer Hall-Lande; Jenny N Poynter; Libby Hallas-Muchow; John N Constantino; Robert T Fitzgerald; Walter Zahorodny; Josephine Shenouda; Julie L Daniels; Zachary Warren; Alison Vehorn; Angelica Salinas; Maureen S Durkin; Patricia M Dietz Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2020-03-27