Literature DB >> 35366109

What is the impact of pulse modulation technology, laser settings and intraoperative irrigation conditions on the irrigation fluid temperature during flexible ureteroscopy? An in vivo experiment using artificial stones.

Angelis Peteinaris1, Konstantinos Pagonis2, Athanasios Vagionis2, Constantinos Adamou2, Arman Tsaturyan2, Begoña Ballesta Martínez2, Georgios Karpetas3, Ergina Farsari4, Evangelos Liatsikos2,5,6, Panagiotis Kallidonis2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of different combinations of laser power settings and irrigation conditions using the pulse modulation technology of Quanta™ on irrigation fluid temperature (IFT) during FURS (flexible ureteroscopy) on an in-vivo porcine model with artificial stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A female pig was used. Following the insertion of artificial stones (Begostone™, BEGO USA, Lincoln, RI), a K-type thermocouple was fixed to the created percutaneous access tract. Real-time recordings of IFT during FURS were performed without UAS (ureteral access sheath), with 10/12 UAS, 12/14 UAS and 14/16 UAS. Stone fragmentation was achieved using Quanta Litho Cyber Ho 150 W™ (Samarate, Italy). The IFT was recorded for 30 s, during laser activation, with power settings of 20, 40, 60, 75 and 100 W under both manual pump and gravity irrigation.
RESULTS: The IFT rise above 54 °C was recorded above a power of 40 W when gravity irrigation was used. The use of UAS prolonged the time for IFT to reach high values, although high power settings increase IFT within seconds from the laser activation. Under pump irrigation, only the 100 W power setting without the use of UAS resulted in dangerous IFT after approximately 10 s.
CONCLUSION: The high-power Ho:YAG laser can cause a damaging thermal effect to the kidney exceeding the threshold of 54 °C, under gravity irrigation. Lower power settings (up to 40 W) can be used with safety. According to our experiment, when using high power settings, the use of UAS and manual pump irrigation, is the safest combination regarding renal thermal damage.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial; Laser; Pig; Stone; Temperature; Ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35366109     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04002-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  15 in total

1.  BegoStone--a new stone phantom for shock wave lithotripsy research.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The Rise and Fall of High Temperatures During Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Brenton Winship; Daniel Wollin; Evan Carlos; Chloe Peters; Jingqiu Li; Russell Terry; Kohldon Boydston; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Ralf Petzold; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Philippe-Fabian Müller; Martin Schoenthaler; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Simulation of Laser Lithotripsy-Induced Heating in the Urinary Tract.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Brian MacConaghy; Jonathan D Harper; Ali H Aldoukhi; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Thermal Response to High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Ali H Aldoukhi; Khurshid R Ghani; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Thulium Laser in the Upper Urinary Tract: Does the Heat Generation in the Irrigation Fluid Pose a Risk? Evidence from an In Vivo Experimental Study.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Wissam Kamal; Vasileios Panagopoulos; Marinos Vasilas; Lefteris Amanatides; Iason Kyriazis; Theofanis Vrettos; Fotini Fligou; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  A simple method for fabricating artificial kidney stones of different physical properties.

Authors:  Eric Esch; Walter Neal Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Hadley F Cocks; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-22

8.  CEM43°C thermal dose thresholds: a potential guide for magnetic resonance radiofrequency exposure levels?

Authors:  Gerard C van Rhoon; Theodoros Samaras; Pavel S Yarmolenko; Mark W Dewhirst; Esra Neufeld; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Lasers for stone treatment: how safe are they?

Authors:  Yasser A Noureldin; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Fragmentation of brittle material by shock wave lithotripsy. Momentum transfer and inertia: a novel view on fragmentation mechanisms.

Authors:  Othmar J Wess; Juergen Mayer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  1 in total

1.  Construction of a novel rabbit model of ureteral calculi implanted with flowable resin.

Authors:  Hao Su; Heng Liu; Ke Yang; Weiming Chen; Dongbo Yuan; Wei Wang; Guohua Zhu; Bin Hu; Kehua Jiang; Jianguo Zhu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.090

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.