| Literature DB >> 35363919 |
Lisa Fagerli Lunde1, Rannveig Jacobsen1,2, Håvard Kauserud3, Lynne Boddy4, Line Nybakken1, Anne Sverdrup-Thygeson1, Tone Birkemoe1.
Abstract
During decomposition of organic matter, microbial communities may follow different successional trajectories depending on the initial environment and colonizers. The timing and order of the species arrival (assembly history) can lead to divergent communities through priority effects. We explored how assembly history and resource quality affected fungal communities and decay rate of decomposing wood, 1.5 and 4.5 years after tree felling. Additionally, we investigated the effect of invertebrate exclusion during the first two summers. We measured initial resource quality of bark and wood of aspen (Populus tremula) logs and surveyed the fungal communities by DNA metabarcoding at different times during succession. We found that gradients in fungal community composition were related to resource quality and we discuss how this may reflect different fungal life history strategies. As with previous studies, the initial amount of bark tannins was negatively correlated with wood decomposition rate over 4.5 years. The initial fungal community explained variation in community composition after 1.5, but not 4.5, years of succession. Although the assembly history of initial colonizers may cause alternative trajectories in successional communities, our results indicate that the communities may converge with the arrival of secondary colonizers. We also identified a strong legacy of invertebrate exclusion on fungal communities, even after 4.5 years of succession, thereby adding crucial knowledge on the importance of invertebrates in affecting fungal community development. By measuring and manipulating aspects of assembly history and resource quality that have rarely been studied, we expand our understanding of the complexity of fungal community dynamics.Entities:
Keywords: aspen; assembly history; dead wood; insects; latent fungi; secondary metabolites; wood decay fungi
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35363919 PMCID: PMC9322270 DOI: 10.1111/mec.16448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ecol ISSN: 0962-1083 Impact factor: 6.622
FIGURE 1Ordination biplot of the first and second compositional gradients of fungal OTUs from aspen logs (n = 424) in year 2 and 5 after tree felling (gNMDS of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities; stress = 0.14). Coloured ellipses display the standard error of treatment levels, while error bars display the standard deviation. Vectors are fitted with the “envfit” function in the package VEGAN and are based on a forward selection of linear mixed models of each gNMDS axis. Light grey dots represent plot scores of year 2 and dark grey of year 5
Variation partitioning with constrained ordination (CCA) of fungal community composition in aspen logs in year 2 after tree felling (n = 213). Variables are based on a forward model selection with p as the selection criterion. Inertia of constrained variables is modelled alone without conditioning variables to show variation explained independent of other variables
| Variable | Inertia | Proportion explained |
|---|---|---|
| Landscape | 0.1335 | 0.0200 |
| Invertebrate exclusion | 0.1142 | 0.0171 |
| Bark flavonoids | 0.0879 | 0.0131 |
| Wood phenolic acids | 0.0849 | 0.0127 |
| Bark soluble tannins | 0.0805 | 0.0120 |
| Wood salicylates | 0.0788 | 0.0118 |
| Wood flavonoids | 0.0750 | 0.0112 |
| Wood carbon | 0.0702 | 0.0105 |
| Initial fungal community (1) | 0.0679 | 0.0101 |
| Bark phenolic acids | 0.0651 | 0.0097 |
| Initial fungal community (2) | 0.0641 | 0.0096 |
| Bark insoluble tannins | 0.0640 | 0.0096 |
| Log section | 0.0586 | 0.0088 |
| Wood nitrogen | 0.0504 | 0.0075 |
| Unconstrained | 5.7361 | 0.8574 |
| Total | 6.6900 | — |
Inertia of constrained and unconstrained axes does not add up to the total inertia because 2.11% of the variation is shared between one or several variables.
Variation partitioning with constrained ordination (CCA) of fungal community composition in aspen logs in year 5 after tree felling (n = 213). Variables are based on a forward model selection with p as the selection criterion. Inertia of constrained variables is modelled alone without conditioning variables to show variation explained independent of other variables
| Variable | Inertia | Proportion explained |
|---|---|---|
| Invertebrate exclusion | 0.3071 | 0.0173 |
| Landscape | 0.2049 | 0.0116 |
| Bark phenolic acids | 0.1681 | 0.0095 |
| Bark flavonoids | 0.1395 | 0.0079 |
| Wood phenolic acids | 0.1314 | 0.0074 |
| Wood flavonoids | 0.1272 | 0.0072 |
| Wood nitrogen | 0.1027 | 0.0058 |
| Unconstrained | 16.5813 | 0.9352 |
| Total | 17.7301 | — |
Inertia of constrained and unconstrained axes does not add up to the total inertia because 0.18% of the variation is shared between one or several variables.
FIGURE 2Linear mixed model effect sizes of initial conditions explaining fungal OTU richness in aspen logs in year 2 and 5 after tree felling, based on a forward model selection with Site as a random effect. Effect sizes that do not overlap with zero are significant (α = 0.05). Reference levels in the intercept are: Invertebrate exclusion (cage), Log section (end) and Landscape (Østmarka)
Linear mixed models of initial conditions explaining variation in aspen wood density in year 2 and 5 after tree felling. The models are based on a forward model selection (AICc) with Site as a random effect
| Predictors | Wood density, year 2 | Wood density, year 5 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect size (95% CI) | Statistic |
| Effect size (95% CI) | Statistic |
| |
| Intercept | 0.36 (0.35–0.37) | 0.33 (0.31–0.34) | ||||
| Bark phenolic acids | 0.02 (0.01–0.04) | 3.45 | . | |||
| Bark methanol‐insoluble tannins | 0.04 (0.02–0.05) | 5.12 |
| 0.06 (0.04–0.08) | 6.07 |
|
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Significant p values (<.05) in bold.