Literature DB >> 35362777

Biomechanics of hamstring tendon, quadriceps tendon, and bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Darren Hart1, Tanner Gurney-Dunlop2, Jeff Leiter3,4, Robert Longstaffe4,5, Ahmed Shawky Eid6, Sheila McRae3,4, Peter MacDonald4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The three most commonly used autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) are: bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB), hamstring tendons (HT), and quadriceps tendon (QT). A cadaveric study was performed to determine if there were any differences in mechanical and structural properties under biomechanical testing.
METHODS: Twenty-seven graft specimens were harvested from 9 human cadaveric legs. Mean donor age was 75.2 years (range 53-85 years). Twenty-two specimens (8 HT, 7 QT, and 7 BTB) completed cyclic preconditioning from 50 to 800 N for 200 cycles and a load to failure test at an extension rate of 1 mm/s. Structural and mechanical properties of BTB, HT, and QT grafts were compared using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey's honest significant difference.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the ultimate load to failure (N) across all 3 graft types (p = 0.951). Quadriceps tendon demonstrated greater cross-sectional area (mm2) when compared to both HT and BTB (p = 0.001) and was significantly stiffer (N/mm) than HT but not BTB (p = 0.004). Stress (N/mm2) of the HT at ultimate load was greater than QT but not BTB (p = 0.036). Elastic modulus (MPa) of HT was greater than both QT and BTB (p = 0.016).
CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the ultimate load to failure of BTB, HT, and QT grafts harvested from the same specimens. All 3 grafts had similar loads to failure with a significant increase in stiffness when compared to the native ACL. Furthermore, QT demonstrated more favourable structural properties compared to HT and BTB with greater cross-sectional area to both HT and BTB and greater stiffness compared to HT.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Biomechanical properties; Hamstring; Patellar tendon; Quadriceps tendon; Reconstruction

Year:  2022        PMID: 35362777     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03247-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  18 in total

1.  Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques.

Authors:  D L Hamner; C H Brown; M E Steiner; A T Hecker; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.

Authors:  Nicholas Gh Mohtadi; Denise S Chan; Katie N Dainty; Daniel B Whelan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

3.  Mechanical tensile properties of the quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament in young adults.

Authors:  H U Stäubli; L Schatzmann; P Brunner; L Rincón; L P Nolte
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Does a different dose of gamma irradiation have the same effect on five different types of tendon allografts? - a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Gyorgy Hangody; Gábor Szebényi; Bence Abonyi; Rita Kiss; László Hangody; Károly Pap
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Emerging Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jacob Budny; Joseph Fox; Michael Rauh; Marc Fineberg
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  The anterior cruciate ligament: a technique of repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  J L Marshall; R F Warren; T L Wickiewicz; B Reider
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts.

Authors:  Dany Mouarbes; Jacques Menetrey; Vincent Marot; Louis Courtot; Emilie Berard; Etienne Cavaignac
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Benefits of multidisciplinary case conferencing using audiovisual compared with telephone communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S F Wilson; R Marks; N Collins; B Warner; L Frick
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.184

9.  Central quadriceps tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: Morphometric and biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  N L Harris; D A Smith; L Lamoreaux; M Purnell
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Biomechanical Comparison of Quadriceps and 6-Strand Hamstring Tendon Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ryan Urchek; Spero Karas
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.